Author Topic: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie  (Read 15413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #100 on: November 01, 2012, 11:25:30 AM »
Frank has commitments from two 4 star players at South Carolina. :dunno:

i'm guessing frank had offered them while he was still at k-state, right?

Frank is damaged goods.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #101 on: November 01, 2012, 11:31:11 AM »

Don't know/care whether you are a oscar apologist or not, but just watch.  The "can't recruit to K-State" talking point is going to come back with a vengeance, whether you individually make that argument or not.


Well, like I said, I'll never make the argument.  Never have.  Days of Timmy Weiser are over.  All things KSTATEO seem to be diminishing.  In all seriousness, this is as close to a golden era as fans have had in K-State sports history.  I hope that with the NCAA bball and football success and the massive facility upgrades, and with the night and day transformation of the general fan experience, fans will fiercly resist devolving into another era of Wooly mediocrity. 

I hope I'm not wrong.  Ironically, the worst thing that could happen is sustained football success.  See Nebraska. 

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #102 on: November 01, 2012, 11:33:26 AM »
We've come a long way.  :gocho:
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #103 on: November 01, 2012, 11:36:56 AM »
We've come a long way.  :gocho:

But don't you feel like we've thrown it all away?

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #104 on: November 01, 2012, 11:47:56 AM »
We've come a long way.  :gocho:

But don't you feel like we've thrown it all away?

yes.  not all away right now.  I think it will eventually all go away, but slowly.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #105 on: November 01, 2012, 11:52:07 AM »
we never would've hired huggins in the first place if bill was going to bcs games at the time. goodbye basketball. maybe some day we'll meet again.

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #106 on: November 01, 2012, 02:37:08 PM »
We've come a long way.  :gocho:

But don't you feel like we've thrown it all away?
No, I certainly don't. I don't think the expectation to win will go down dramatically.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38108
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #107 on: November 01, 2012, 02:40:24 PM »
We've come a long way.  :gocho:

But don't you feel like we've thrown it all away?
No, I certainly don't. I don't think the expectation to win will go down dramatically.

This season, or at anytime in oscar's time here?  I agree with this season, but I think a large part of our base will be just fine if he wins less than Frank did, eventually.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #108 on: November 01, 2012, 02:41:56 PM »
Saul, you're underestimating the ability of tucks to accept mediocrity.

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #109 on: November 01, 2012, 02:46:21 PM »
Saul, you're underestimating the ability of tucks to accept mediocrity.
You're underestimating the ability of goEMAW to be a catalyst of change.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #110 on: November 01, 2012, 02:48:27 PM »
I hope you're right.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #111 on: November 01, 2012, 02:48:58 PM »
Saul, you're underestimating the ability of tucks to accept mediocrity.
You're underestimating the ability of goEMAW to be a catalyst of change.

maybe. The Huggins hiring effort went amazingly well, but the oscar hire was spectacularly horrible.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #112 on: November 01, 2012, 02:51:43 PM »
Saul, you're underestimating the ability of tucks to accept mediocrity.
You're underestimating the ability of goEMAW to be a catalyst of change.

maybe. The Huggins hiring effort went amazingly well, but the oscar hire was spectacularly horrible.

Yeah. Huggins and the plane banner were great. But Currie doesn't give a flying eff about what we think, nor will he ever. The challenge in affecting change in basketball is now much higher.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #113 on: November 01, 2012, 02:59:46 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #114 on: November 01, 2012, 03:06:57 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

I don't think we'll have that after Angel leaves. And then we'll fire oscar and go the conventional route - hire some slob from Oral Roberts or SW Missouri State that had a nice run in the tournament who flounders, then we will rinse and repeat.

One of the nice things about the Huggins timing was the sense of desperation surrounding the program. Without that desperation, people are OK hiring Johnny Mid-Major over and over and over.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #115 on: November 01, 2012, 03:07:43 PM »
There was a moment, fleeting though it may have been, where I truly honest to God thought we were going to hire Doug Gottlieb. The moment passed as quickly as it came, however, and when the dust settled, the silhouette of a gap-toothed, chicken nuggets-loving, proven loser from Illinois emerged in Manhattan, KS. The moment is gone.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47974
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #116 on: November 01, 2012, 03:08:02 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

98% of this board (ksufans) were those people not long ago.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #117 on: November 01, 2012, 03:16:22 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

98% of this board (ksufans) were those people not long ago.

Clams, as contrarian as you’re trying to be, you can’t possibly really believe this.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #118 on: November 01, 2012, 03:20:57 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

Maybe every single one of my friends is an outlier, then, because I don't associate with a single KSUer who is fine being a consistent bubble team.  And I associate with a lot of KSUers.


Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47974
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #119 on: November 01, 2012, 03:23:19 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

98% of this board (ksufans) were those people not long ago.

Clams, as contrarian as you’re trying to be, you can’t possibly really believe this.

i'm not trying to be anything.  that post is almost word for word exactly what we hoped for in the wooly/late snyder years.  you're either lying to yourself if you don't think you felt the same way or you have a very bad memory of the state of our athletic dept.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #120 on: November 01, 2012, 03:23:47 PM »
I can't decide which is more Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) - being absolutely convinced that oscar Weber will be neckbrace2.0 or seriously wanting doug gottlieb to be our next coach.

Admittedly, I too had a fleeting thought that Gottlieb would be a great hire.  Then I gave it some thought. 

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88664
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #121 on: November 01, 2012, 03:24:56 PM »
I can't decide which is more Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) - being absolutely convinced that oscar Weber will be neckbrace2.0 or seriously wanting doug gottlieb to be our next coach.

damnit

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #122 on: November 01, 2012, 03:27:17 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

Maybe every single one of my friends is an outlier, then, because I don't associate with a single KSUer who is fine being a consistent bubble team.  And I associate with a lot of KSUers.


i believe you when you say that your friends don't think that they'll be fine with it. the problem is that humans as a whole are very, very bad at predicting what will and what won't bring them future happiness, belvis.


the below link gives just one reason why, but there are many more...

http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/people-neglect-who-they-really-are-when-predicting-their-own-future-happiness.html
« Last Edit: November 01, 2012, 03:30:38 PM by rick daris »

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42635
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #123 on: November 01, 2012, 03:27:53 PM »
98% of our fan base is perfectly fine having a consistent bubble team as long as we do things the right way and are going to bowl games. this is a fact.

Maybe every single one of my friends is an outlier, then, because I don't associate with a single KSUer who is fine being a consistent bubble team.  And I associate with a lot of KSUers.

We're outliers.

EDIT: Just read your Gottlieb thing.  You're an outlier among outliers.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #124 on: November 01, 2012, 03:29:23 PM »
I can't decide which is more Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) - being absolutely convinced that oscar Weber will be neckbrace2.0 or seriously wanting doug gottlieb to be our next coach.

Admittedly, I too had a fleeting thought that Gottlieb would be a great hire.  Then I gave it some thought.

well Gottlieb would have been high risk/high reward. Much like our last 2 hires, which turned out fantastic. Hiring Weber is high risk/low reward. Unless you think dwindling in mediocrity is not a risk. In which case hiring Weber is low risk/low reward.