Author Topic: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie  (Read 15409 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6365
    • View Profile
Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« on: October 28, 2012, 11:03:21 PM »


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Barry McCockner

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 719
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2012, 11:06:59 PM »
Maybe this is our KITN for the year.
"WELL BARYY YOU GOTTA DO WHAT YOU DO BECUZ IF YOU DONT DO IT, THEN WHO WILL - YOU GOTTA HAVE HART AND DATERMANASHIN AND FLOURIDE IN YOUR SYSTEM TO BE A TRUE CHAMPION" - The Ed

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2012, 11:10:20 PM »
Can't see the article, but anyway:

Normally Clemson would be perceived as a step up from us, but these days you don't leave a Big 12 school for anyone in the ACC besides FSU, UNC, and maybe Duke. Not surprised Clemson interviewed him though. Their fans have been bitching about the school being too straight-laced and not providing enough support to athletics recently so if that's true he'd fit the Clemson leadership's desired profile while likely boosting their ability to raise funds.

« Last Edit: October 28, 2012, 11:21:50 PM by 42 »

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2012, 11:18:26 PM »
oh man.  a lot of people on here have egg on their face.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2012, 11:23:13 PM »
oh man.  a lot of people on here have egg on their face.

tears, not egg.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2012, 11:29:35 PM »
oh man.  a lot of people on here have egg on their face.

tears, not egg.

no, its egg, trust me

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2012, 11:46:47 PM »
no, its egg, trust me

i've never cried eggs before, kim.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2012, 12:13:49 AM »

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42635
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2012, 06:11:05 AM »
Quote
-- Kansas State athletics director John Currie was prominently on Clemson's radar at one point, but we've been told he turned down the job in part because he signed an extension at Kansas State over the summer. We're not sure if Clemson made a second run at him and what became of it, if that indeed happened.

Jesus Christ, animal.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88664
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2012, 07:23:32 AM »
maybe all the intel on currie looking to jump ship was incorrect?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38108
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2012, 07:49:49 AM »
JFC! He actually wants to work w oscar.

I don't even...

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2


Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47974
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2012, 08:51:39 AM »
maybe all the intel on currie looking to jump ship was incorrect?

maybe 90% of the things we think we know here is incorrect


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13512
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2012, 09:06:00 AM »
maybe all the intel on currie looking to jump ship was incorrect?

maybe 90% of the things we think we know here is incorrect
what if the whole world was vice versa

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47974
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2012, 09:07:06 AM »
it's not opposite day, y-l-a.  or is it?   :confused:


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32549
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2012, 09:12:09 AM »
Dnr the link, did the clemson bbs discuss dollar figure?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53941
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2012, 10:17:48 AM »
JFC! He actually wants to work w oscar.

I don't even...

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

What if he turns oscar into a total badass?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38108
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2012, 12:25:05 PM »
JFC! He actually wants to work w oscar.

I don't even...

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

What if he turns oscar into a total badass?

Extend his contact to life w a $50mil buyout

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2


Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline wazucat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 411
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2012, 04:49:13 PM »
JFC! He actually wants to work w oscar.

I don't even...

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

What if he turns oscar into a total badass?



 :horrorsurprise:  Maybe he's gettin a little better every day.

Offline Clevey 2 Times

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1260
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2012, 08:18:12 PM »
I still, irrationally, want him gone. Someone help me change my mind...

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6365
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2012, 08:40:09 PM »
I still, irrationally, want him gone. Someone help me change my mind...

The Martin/Currie relationship didn't work because Currie is a huge dork who loves money. But that's a pretty great asset to have as an AD. He'll get shiny stuff built for us, but basically his entire long term legacy rests on if he can actually make a good football hire. If he can, he's a been a great AD for us.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2012, 12:30:27 AM »
I still, irrationally, want him gone. Someone help me change my mind...

The Martin/Currie relationship didn't work because Currie is a huge dork who loves money. But that's a pretty great asset to have as an AD. He'll get shiny stuff built for us, but basically his entire long term legacy rests on if he can actually make a good football hire. If he can, he's a been a great AD for us.

pretty :dubious: take considering its on the basketball board

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2012, 09:55:54 AM »
I still, irrationally, want him gone. Someone help me change my mind...

The Martin/Currie relationship didn't work because Currie is a huge dork who loves money. But that's a pretty great asset to have as an AD. He'll get shiny stuff built for us, but basically his entire long term legacy rests on if he can actually make a good football hire. If he can, he's a been a great AD for us.

To this point, Currie has been a B+ AD.  A+ AD who loses a full letter grade because of the Martin debacle.  Aside from that...

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Apparently, Clemson went hard after Currie
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2012, 09:58:59 AM »
I still, irrationally, want him gone. Someone help me change my mind...

The Martin/Currie relationship didn't work because Currie is a huge dork who loves money. But that's a pretty great asset to have as an AD. He'll get shiny stuff built for us, but basically his entire long term legacy rests on if he can actually make a good football hire. If he can, he's a been a great AD for us.

To this point, Currie has been a B+ AD.  A+ AD who loses a full letter grade because of the Martin debacle.  Aside from that...

Take another letter grade for the Webber debacle
:adios: