Author Topic: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team  (Read 42272 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #225 on: January 07, 2013, 03:27:59 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88582
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #226 on: January 07, 2013, 03:29:51 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:

the '98 RBs were complete puds. good grief. Harper is better than McDonald and TLBL is better than A. Lockett. On top of that, Thompson is better than Peries or whoever you throw out as the third option.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #227 on: January 07, 2013, 03:30:28 PM »
Deffense was, iirc:

Beisel
Fatafehi?
other DT?
Howard
Simoneau
Kelly
Ochs
Butler
Cooper
Chapman
Carter

Pretty much as I suspected. Who from '12 sneaks into that starting 11? Arthur? Ty? Meshak? Ira, I'm not sure on what planet this year's DBs are better than Coop, Chap, Butler & Carter (didn't we also have Neasman or somebody in nickle situations?).

IMHO, no unit of the '12 defense is better than the '98 defense. That year's D was definitely vintage  :lynchmob:

Nobody threw the ball in '98 like they do now.  I probably shouldn't have said "landslide" but this year's db's did a very good job.

Offline Unruly

  • Oh so Unruly.
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2703
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #228 on: January 07, 2013, 03:30:52 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:


Yeah, but if you put lockett and harper with bish. Not even close.
:dance:


Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #229 on: January 07, 2013, 03:34:00 PM »
Does Cooper fit the 'Safeties getting suckier the longer they play at KSU' theory?

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #230 on: January 07, 2013, 03:35:47 PM »
Zim plays ahead of either coop or chapman.

Conceded (but Chap had more athletic talent than Ty).

nigel ahead of either butler or carter.

Nope. I'd put Nigel ahead of Dyshod but not Jerametrius "Jerry." Butler had a decent NFL career, IIRC.

I think you are too high on them because they beat up on a lot of really bad teams. also, as ira noted, they didn't play a single team that threw the ball well (until Purdue who whooped their ass).

I don't (nor should anybody) hold Purdue against the '98 Defense. It just wouldn't be fair.  Throwing out Purdue, I'd like to see some data on our Pass Defense from '98 vs. '12 to confirm or persuade my opinions.
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88582
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #231 on: January 07, 2013, 03:36:41 PM »
you can't throw games out  :lol:

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #232 on: January 07, 2013, 03:37:59 PM »
Does Cooper fit the 'Safeties getting suckier the longer they play at KSU' theory?
For Ty Zimmerman's sake, I sure hope this trend is a thing of the past (graduated w/Tysyn Hartman?)
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #233 on: January 07, 2013, 03:45:33 PM »
I don't want to stain a legacy, but you should understand why the '98 defense is considered to be so great. In the first 9 games KSU gave up:

0
7
7
7
9
20
7
6
6

The hype was at an all time high and Nebraska was coming to town. (if you were 40 years old in 1998, you might have remembered one time KSU beat NU back when you were 10 in 1968)

K-State won. People were elated. The '98 team and Bishop were Gods and life was complete.

But in the last four games, against the hardest part of their schedule (other than Texas), they gave up:
30
25
36
37



« Last Edit: January 07, 2013, 03:52:36 PM by Ira Hayes »

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #234 on: January 07, 2013, 03:54:57 PM »
Does Cooper fit the 'Safeties getting suckier the longer they play at KSU' theory?
For Ty Zimmerman's sake, I sure hope this trend is a thing of the past (graduated w/Tysyn Hartman?)
Mike Leach's arrival in the Big 12 in 1999 had a ton to due with Coop's downfall. 

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #235 on: January 07, 2013, 04:30:50 PM »
Does Cooper fit the 'Safeties getting suckier the longer they play at KSU' theory?
For Ty Zimmerman's sake, I sure hope this trend is a thing of the past (graduated w/Tysyn Hartman?)
Mike Leach's arrival in the Big 12 in 1999 had a ton to due with Coop's downfall.
True. And Coop's downfall should also be blamed on coaching and not on Coop.

Offline Willesgirl

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 798
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #236 on: January 07, 2013, 04:49:27 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:

the '98 RBs were complete puds. good grief. Harper is better than McDonald and TLBL is better than A. Lockett. On top of that, Thompson is better than Peries or whoever you throw out as the third option.

The '98 Lockett was NOT Aaron. It was Daddy Lockett, Kevin.  :facepalm:

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12305
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #237 on: January 07, 2013, 04:53:40 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:

the '98 RBs were complete puds. good grief. Harper is better than McDonald and TLBL is better than A. Lockett. On top of that, Thompson is better than Peries or whoever you throw out as the third option.

The '98 Lockett was NOT Aaron. It was Daddy Lockett, Kevin.  :facepalm:

Please leave and never come back.

TIA
-Everyone

Offline Willesgirl

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 798
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #238 on: January 07, 2013, 04:58:33 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:

the '98 RBs were complete puds. good grief. Harper is better than McDonald and TLBL is better than A. Lockett. On top of that, Thompson is better than Peries or whoever you throw out as the third option.

The '98 Lockett was NOT Aaron. It was Daddy Lockett, Kevin.  :facepalm:

Please leave and never come back.

TIA
-Everyone

Nope.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #239 on: January 07, 2013, 05:00:05 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:

the '98 RBs were complete puds. good grief. Harper is better than McDonald and TLBL is better than A. Lockett. On top of that, Thompson is better than Peries or whoever you throw out as the third option.

The '98 Lockett was NOT Aaron. It was Daddy Lockett, Kevin.  :facepalm:

Okay, cool.  The Chiefs drafted Kevin in 1997, so this means the Chiefs should be able to draft a QB with a couple years of eligibility left this year.  Should we go for Manziel or maybe Tajh Boyd if he doesn't declare early?
:adios:

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #240 on: January 07, 2013, 05:02:36 PM »
Offense Was, iirc:

McDonald
Swift
11th biggest line in all of football including NFL or whatever
Bish
Goolsby
Hickson or Lawrence or Charles or whatever pud
Lockett

RBs = I'd give '98 a slight edge. Hickson & Lawrence were a solid tandem. Charles (I remember watching him go out on a stretcher in Columbia) was even better until he got hurt.

WRs = I think it's a push. I mean, McDonald & Lockett (size and speed) vs. Harp & Lockett (size & elusiveness/big plays). We had more deep passes/big plays in '98, IIRC (I'm sure somebody has the data on this).

Wasn't David Allen already our KR/PR in '98? That was one scary and complete team. So sad we (Bishop) fumbled it all away ...  :curse:

the '98 RBs were complete puds. good grief. Harper is better than McDonald and TLBL is better than A. Lockett. On top of that, Thompson is better than Peries or whoever you throw out as the third option.

The '98 Lockett was NOT Aaron. It was Daddy Lockett, Kevin.  :facepalm:

Please leave and never come back.

TIA
-Everyone

Nope.

Good. Stay. Learn.

That '96 team in Daddy Lockett's senior year set the precedent for huge KSU bowl crowds getting let down with a loss.

eff you, Steve Sarkisian.

Offline Willesgirl

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 798
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #241 on: January 07, 2013, 05:05:22 PM »
Should've wiki'ed. I thought K. Lockett graduated in '98. Apologies, all!

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2011
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #242 on: January 07, 2013, 05:44:24 PM »
Frank Murphy was Bryce Brown before Bryce Brown was Bryce Brown.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #243 on: January 07, 2013, 06:00:05 PM »
 :lol: at the lockett mix up

Frank Murphy > Bryce Brown

Offline Willesgirl

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 798
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #244 on: January 07, 2013, 06:01:51 PM »
:lol: at the lockett mix up

Frank Murphy > Bryce Brown

Yeah. Yeah. I'm a jackass. And agree on the Frank Murphy bit.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22453
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #245 on: January 07, 2013, 06:14:22 PM »
:lol: at the lockett mix up

Frank Murphy > Bryce Brown

Yeah. Yeah. I'm a jackass. And agree on the Frank Murphy bit.

Now is a good time to insult them for being old enough to remember.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17843
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #246 on: January 07, 2013, 06:21:40 PM »
Fun fact: In the 1999 NFL draft, our first player taken was taken at #80. That was Gramatica. Our first payer taken from offense or defense was taken at #198.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #247 on: January 07, 2013, 06:40:51 PM »
Fun fact: In the 1999 NFL draft, our first player taken was taken at #80. That was Gramatica. Our first payer taken from offense or defense was taken at #198.
Jakesie with a truth bomb
:adios:

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #248 on: January 07, 2013, 09:03:59 PM »
, I'm not sure on what planet this year's DBs are better than Coop, Chap, Butler & Carter (didn't we also have Neasman or somebody in nickle situations?).

Zim plays ahead of either coop or chapman. nigel ahead of either butler or carter. I think you are too high on them because they beat up on a lot of really bad teams. also, as ira noted, they didn't play a single team that threw the ball well (until Purdue who whooped their ass). Neasman was also very meh.

Purdue scored a lot of points but the defense played fine. 90% of it was the offenses fault.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: This Team Is Better Than The 1998 Team
« Reply #249 on: January 07, 2013, 09:15:31 PM »