Author Topic: Defense concerning  (Read 2170 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Defense concerning
« on: October 06, 2012, 02:01:29 PM »
Not looking good


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2012, 02:08:30 PM »
5 TOs.  :dunno:

Offline kstater

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2229
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2012, 02:09:28 PM »
KU: 81 plays 385 yards.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2012, 02:11:02 PM »

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2012, 02:11:36 PM »

Offline shivvyman

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 325
  • Hates All Races Equally
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2012, 02:13:18 PM »
5 TOs.  :dunno:

luck

Haha, yea, because our turnover margin hasn't been good at all lately.

A little soft on the run, but we are only as good as the scheme and we weren't bring anybody but the front 4 the first half.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2012, 02:23:15 PM »
If Sean knew they were going to fake it like the rest of the stadium, they score 9.  Not great, but acceptable.

Offline Pittcat

  • Resident Purveyor of Above Avererage Staplers.
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1114
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2012, 02:48:55 PM »
3021  RIP

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2012, 03:48:04 PM »
why did we let them run so many plays? why not force a 3 and out?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2012, 05:04:14 PM »
I wonder how many straight weeks will we be subjected to dumbasses crying about yards given up while completely ignoring points given up?  5 for 5 at this point.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2012, 05:05:17 PM »
I wonder how many straight weeks will we be subjected to dumbasses crying about yards given up while completely ignoring points given up?  5 for 5 at this point.

we bendy, no breaky, that is for sure.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2012, 05:06:21 PM »
I wonder how many straight weeks will we be subjected to dumbasses crying about yards given up while completely ignoring points given up?  5 for 5 at this point.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline Duncan

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 414
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2012, 05:17:23 PM »
I wonder how many straight weeks will we be subjected to dumbasses crying about yards given up while completely ignoring points given up?  5 for 5 at this point.

just worried about WV and UT

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Defense concerning
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2012, 05:31:41 PM »
I don't think we played well in the first half. I also think the way we played has little to no correlation to how we'll play against WVU, UT, etc.

Offline Duncan

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 414
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2012, 05:40:54 PM »
probably. We just had a few plays where the receiver or running back were by themselves in space , just concerned a bit.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2012, 05:41:41 PM »
why did we let them run so many plays? why not force a 3 and out?

no answers I see. thread validated.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #16 on: October 06, 2012, 10:10:11 PM »
I don't think we played well in the first half. I also think the way we played has little to no correlation to how we'll play against WVU, UT, etc.

 :thumbs:
emaw

Offline Super PurpleCat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3555
  • purple hugs are back! get yours today
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #17 on: October 06, 2012, 10:12:20 PM »
Played down to competition for 2 quarters.

 :zzz:

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #18 on: October 06, 2012, 10:12:45 PM »
why did we let them run so many plays? why not force a 3 and out?

no answers I see. thread validated.

When you score they get the ball back.

Online 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1663
    • View Profile
Re: Defense concerning
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2012, 10:24:50 PM »
I don't think we played well in the first half. I also think the way we played has little to no correlation to how we'll play against WVU, UT, etc.

Were we vanilla on defense in the first half? Coverage/tackling was not good, but it seems like we never sent more than the d-line in obvious blitz situations and we were still 7 points better than KU despite poor play and poor coaching.