Official who are we cheering for this weekend thread - WEEK 7

[Unruly]

I think I would rather have ND win, and then have ND lose @ OU?


Good plan or ????

no, shitty plan

But that will look good if ND is super high and OU kicks their pecker holes in right?

it'll look better if Miami and OU both do it.

Yeah, good grief.  What is with this guy?

The aim was to have ND as high as they could be for when they played OU and lost.    seems like a good idea

[steve dave]

I think I would rather have ND win, and then have ND lose @ OU?


Good plan or ????

no, shitty plan

But that will look good if ND is super high and OU kicks their pecker holes in right?

it'll look better if Miami and OU both do it.

Yeah, good grief.  What is with this guy?

The aim was to have ND as high as they could be for when they played OU and lost.    seems like a good idea

the issue wasn't that we didn't understand your thought process. it was that your thought process was so awful. I'm kind of uncomfortable having to say it again because I think you may be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) and not Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I call everyone here Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) all the time but real Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I feel bad pointing it out.

[Unruly]

I think I would rather have ND win, and then have ND lose @ OU?


Good plan or ????

no, shitty plan

But that will look good if ND is super high and OU kicks their pecker holes in right?

it'll look better if Miami and OU both do it.

Yeah, good grief.  What is with this guy?

The aim was to have ND as high as they could be for when they played OU and lost.    seems like a good idea

the issue wasn't that we didn't understand your thought process. it was that your thought process was so awful. I'm kind of uncomfortable having to explain it because I think you may be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) and not Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I call everyone here Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) all the time but real Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I feel bad pointing it out.

What is wrong with it? Is it purely based on margin of win of us over miami vs OU? Is it home vs away?  I mean ND being 8ish when they come into Norman and lose would be pretty huge vs them being 20-25 I would think.

[MixBerryCrunch]

OU
TX
Miami
Florida (LSU only has one tough game after this one and it's Alabama. Definitely want LSU to win that one so they both end up with one loss.)
Georgia/South Carolina-Doesn't matter at this time
NCST
Washington

That's who I'm cheering for, besides the Cats, this weekend.

No I think Alabama is safer just staying #1 all year. I do NOT want to have to compete with a 1 loss alabama team for bcs spots

I'm thinking NC. If there are three undefeated teams at the end of the year and the Mighty Morphin' Snydercats are one, then they don't get in. Although, if there are two and Alabama is the other one it would be fun to beat the "best team ever" again.

[_33]

the issue wasn't that we didn't understand your thought process. it was that your thought process was so awful. I'm kind of uncomfortable having to explain it because I think you may be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) and not Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I call everyone here Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) all the time but real Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I feel bad pointing it out.

What is wrong with it? Is it purely based on margin of win of us over miami vs OU? Is it home vs away?  I mean ND being 8ish when they come into Norman and lose would be pretty huge vs them being 20-25 I would think.

SHUT UP

[steve dave]

I think I would rather have ND win, and then have ND lose @ OU?


Good plan or ????

no, shitty plan

But that will look good if ND is super high and OU kicks their pecker holes in right?

it'll look better if Miami and OU both do it.

Yeah, good grief.  What is with this guy?

The aim was to have ND as high as they could be for when they played OU and lost.    seems like a good idea

the issue wasn't that we didn't understand your thought process. it was that your thought process was so awful. I'm kind of uncomfortable having to explain it because I think you may be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) and not Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I call everyone here Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) all the time but real Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like I feel bad pointing it out.

What is wrong with it? Is it purely based on margin of win of us over miami vs OU? Is it home vs away?  I mean ND being 8ish when they come into Norman and lose would be pretty huge vs them being 20-25 I would think.

hmmm, well, when you put it like that 

[Mixed-Nutz]

I want a ND vs KSU Crystal Game, So we need the rest of the top ten to loose.

[Unruly]

Explain your reasoning behind it mother truckers 

[_33]

Explain your reasoning behind it mother truckers 

I would love to just punch you in the stomach as hard as I can.

[MixBerryCrunch]

I want a ND vs KSU Crystal Game, So we need the rest of the top ten to loose.

That would probably be the easiest match-up, but I just hate ND so much and want them to lose every game in every sport indefinitely.

[MadCat]

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA > ND

is better than

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA;
ND > MIA
(KSU's Miami win would be marginalized.)

[steve dave]

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

and while I'm sure Unruly is completely mind mumped having to process this I'm going to add another layer to it anyway and tell you that, if we lose, we want the teams that beat us to ALSO beat the teams we do not play.

[Unruly]

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

Which looks better for KSU the loss to Miami when #11 or the loss to OU when #8?

[Institutional Control]

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

Which looks better for KSU the loss to Miami when #11 or the loss to OU when #8?

A loss to both looks better.

[MadCat]

Pardon me while I scoop my brains off the floor.

[Emo EMAW]

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

Which looks better for KSU the loss to Miami when #11 or the loss to OU when #8?

[Rage Against the McKee]

Pardon me while I scoop my brains off the floor.

I don't think he was talking to you, MadCat. He was just adding to your post.

[steve dave]

Pardon me while I scoop my brains off the floor.

I don't think he was talking to you, MadCat. He was just adding to your post.

yeah

[MadCat]

Pardon me while I scoop my brains off the floor.

I don't think he was talking to you, MadCat. He was just adding to your post.

yeah

I realized that...the next responses made me:

[Unruly]

I'm just so confused.  And nobody will explain it. 

[MadCat]

I'm just so confused.  And nobody will explain it. 

I think I tried to when I updated my post:

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA > ND

is better than

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA;
ND > MIA
(KSU's Miami win would be marginalized.)

[Unruly]

I'm just so confused.  And nobody will explain it. 

I think I tried to when I updated my post:

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA > ND

is better than

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA;
ND > MIA
(KSU's Miami win would be marginalized.)

Thank you.  I was just under the premise that having ND breaking into the top 10 and losing to a big 12 team would have a lot more swing vs them losing to an ACC team outside the top 10. 

[Emo EMAW]

I'm just so confused.  And nobody will explain it. 

I think I tried to when I updated my post:

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA > ND

is better than

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA;
ND > MIA
(KSU's Miami win would be marginalized.)

Thank you.  I was just under the premise that having ND breaking into the top 10 and losing to a big 12 team would have a lot more swing vs them losing to an ACC team outside the top 10. 

WE WANT THEM TO LOSE TO BOTH!

[Unruly]

I'm just so confused.  And nobody will explain it. 

I think I tried to when I updated my post:

We want the teams we beat to beat the teams we do not play.

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA > ND

is better than

KSU > OU > ND;
KSU > MIA;
ND > MIA
(KSU's Miami win would be marginalized.)

Thank you.  I was just under the premise that having ND breaking into the top 10 and losing to a big 12 team would have a lot more swing vs them losing to an ACC team outside the top 10. 

WE WANT THEM TO LOSE TO BOTH!

Yes. I got that now.  That is why I said before I was under the premise of 

[Pete]

I will put it more simply, we only care about the teams we play.