two main differences from a year ago and both surround the play of the line:
1) KSU is far more athletic up front on offense than a year ago. We had zero issues going without a TE in a number of passing situations against Miami. Not only is the difference in capabilities visible but it is demonstrated by the coaches' confidence in formations. OU is NOT as imposing in terms of the pass rush this year. Alexander and Ronnell Lewis were very good collegiate pass rushers and they don't have anybody, at least prepared to play, at their level. This match up last year was a monstrous edge for OU last year and certainly impacted the game significantly.
2) OU has surrendered 6 sacks in the first two games. Last year they gave up about 8 or 9, total. They lost their stud LT, starting center, and a guard who, if he wasn't a starter, saw significant minutes. While KSU doesn't have a bunch of pass rushers I think we have demonstrated from the Miami game that we have some capabilities in that area...at least a little more than a year ago.
This is more like 2a but I will keep harping on this point. OU, even with the veteran line LAST YEAR, has not been the same since Broyles got hurt last year. Broyles was that security blanket with whom Landry had a lot of chemistry. They have struggled since and it continued into their first game this year. They were not the same offense that put 58 points on the board last year AFTER he got hurt.
OU still has better talent, will be playing at home, has more skill...but there are some match ups in this game which are becoming more clear that would lend itself to a very competitive game.
