Author Topic: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD  (Read 32578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #100 on: September 11, 2012, 01:34:59 PM »
So I'm glad we got Marcus Foster, based off everything I've read and seen about him, I think his game is pretty similar to Marcus Denmon's, I hope Foster can produce at the same level for KSU that Denmon was able to for Missouri.

I think this commit gives us so momentum to finish off the rest of this class, which will not be a Top 25 national class, but could feature some very solid pieces for a very competitive team down the road.

If you're worried about Iowa St. passing us, that should have happened when they were able to bring in Royce White, Chris Allen, Anthony Booker, and Korie Lucious. Some may have considered bringing in all those transfers a risk, but guess what, all those guys can play and they proved it last year(Lucious will get his shot this year), grats to Hoiberg for not getting in their way. They've also done a good job bringing in 4* Georges Niang and 3* Sherron Dorsey-Walker in last year's class.

Even before Frank left, they were going to finish ahead of us in the rankings for the Class of '12. They're probably going to finish ahead of us for '13, it's not the end of the world.

Their latest commit, 6'8" PF Richard Armadi, is an NR JC kid who'll have 1 yr of eligibility in 13-14. It sounds like he might be under the radar but I don't think he's going to strike fear in the hearts of other frontlines in the Big 12.

Iowa St was good last year(they beat us twice, finished ahead of us in league), they're probably going to be good into the near future at least. Hoiberg has done a very good rebuilding their program but it's not like it's just coming out of nowhere. It's also not like they're some insurmountable juggernaut that we won't have any ability to compete with. In several instances, we're competing for the same talent(Vitto Brown and Hassan Martin). Embrace the challenge of competing with them.

that would be great if marcus (ours) can be as good as marcus (theirs). sorry for picking the wrong point in time to be bothered by the fact that iowa state appears to be recruiting much better than we are and adding more talent to their program than we are.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2012, 01:38:08 PM by rick daris »

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #101 on: September 11, 2012, 01:54:46 PM »
So I'm glad we got Marcus Foster, based off everything I've read and seen about him, I think his game is pretty similar to Marcus Denmon's, I hope Foster can produce at the same level for KSU that Denmon was able to for Missouri.

I think this commit gives us so momentum to finish off the rest of this class, which will not be a Top 25 national class, but could feature some very solid pieces for a very competitive team down the road.

If you're worried about Iowa St. passing us, that should have happened when they were able to bring in Royce White, Chris Allen, Anthony Booker, and Korie Lucious. Some may have considered bringing in all those transfers a risk, but guess what, all those guys can play and they proved it last year(Lucious will get his shot this year), grats to Hoiberg for not getting in their way. They've also done a good job bringing in 4* Georges Niang and 3* Sherron Dorsey-Walker in last year's class.

Even before Frank left, they were going to finish ahead of us in the rankings for the Class of '12. They're probably going to finish ahead of us for '13, it's not the end of the world.

Their latest commit, 6'8" PF Richard Armadi, is an NR JC kid who'll have 1 yr of eligibility in 13-14. It sounds like he might be under the radar but I don't think he's going to strike fear in the hearts of other frontlines in the Big 12.

Iowa St was good last year(they beat us twice, finished ahead of us in league), they're probably going to be good into the near future at least. Hoiberg has done a very good rebuilding their program but it's not like it's just coming out of nowhere. It's also not like they're some insurmountable juggernaut that we won't have any ability to compete with. In several instances, we're competing for the same talent(Vitto Brown and Hassan Martin). Embrace the challenge of competing with them.

that would be great if marcus (ours) can be as good as marcus (theirs). sorry for picking the wrong point in time to be bothered by the fact that iowa state appears to be recruiting much better than we are and adding more talent to their program than we are.
Hoiberg is to focused on recruiting shooters, players like him, they had the baddest matchup problem in the country last year, White, and were only a good team not a great team. A lack of getting to the rack, being physical will do them in. Also, haven't seen good point guard play from a Hoiberg team, runs way to many NBA sets.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38014
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #102 on: September 11, 2012, 01:58:17 PM »
I'm pretty excited about Marcus Foster.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #103 on: September 11, 2012, 02:18:19 PM »

i guess i'm just annoyed that yet another thread (that had up until this point been entirely about marcus and college basketball recruiting) got turned into weber/currie/burnitdown/etc. discussion.

but hey, that's just me. maybe you guys aren't done discussing all that quite yet.

Agreed.  I think the thread kind of turned on this gem...

"iowa state has two in the top 80. was fun while it lasted i guess."


Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #104 on: September 11, 2012, 02:26:54 PM »
So I'm glad we got Marcus Foster, based off everything I've read and seen about him, I think his game is pretty similar to Marcus Denmon's, I hope Foster can produce at the same level for KSU that Denmon was able to for Missouri.

I think this commit gives us so momentum to finish off the rest of this class, which will not be a Top 25 national class, but could feature some very solid pieces for a very competitive team down the road.

If you're worried about Iowa St. passing us, that should have happened when they were able to bring in Royce White, Chris Allen, Anthony Booker, and Korie Lucious. Some may have considered bringing in all those transfers a risk, but guess what, all those guys can play and they proved it last year(Lucious will get his shot this year), grats to Hoiberg for not getting in their way. They've also done a good job bringing in 4* Georges Niang and 3* Sherron Dorsey-Walker in last year's class.

Even before Frank left, they were going to finish ahead of us in the rankings for the Class of '12. They're probably going to finish ahead of us for '13, it's not the end of the world.

Their latest commit, 6'8" PF Richard Armadi, is an NR JC kid who'll have 1 yr of eligibility in 13-14. It sounds like he might be under the radar but I don't think he's going to strike fear in the hearts of other frontlines in the Big 12.

Iowa St was good last year(they beat us twice, finished ahead of us in league), they're probably going to be good into the near future at least. Hoiberg has done a very good rebuilding their program but it's not like it's just coming out of nowhere. It's also not like they're some insurmountable juggernaut that we won't have any ability to compete with. In several instances, we're competing for the same talent(Vitto Brown and Hassan Martin). Embrace the challenge of competing with them.

sorry for picking the wrong point in time to be bothered by the fact that iowa state appears to be recruiting much better than we are and adding more talent to their program than we are.

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #105 on: September 11, 2012, 03:03:20 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #106 on: September 11, 2012, 03:24:56 PM »
So I'm glad we got Marcus Foster, based off everything I've read and seen about him, I think his game is pretty similar to Marcus Denmon's, I hope Foster can produce at the same level for KSU that Denmon was able to for Missouri.

I think this commit gives us so momentum to finish off the rest of this class, which will not be a Top 25 national class, but could feature some very solid pieces for a very competitive team down the road.

If you're worried about Iowa St. passing us, that should have happened when they were able to bring in Royce White, Chris Allen, Anthony Booker, and Korie Lucious. Some may have considered bringing in all those transfers a risk, but guess what, all those guys can play and they proved it last year(Lucious will get his shot this year), grats to Hoiberg for not getting in their way. They've also done a good job bringing in 4* Georges Niang and 3* Sherron Dorsey-Walker in last year's class.

Even before Frank left, they were going to finish ahead of us in the rankings for the Class of '12. They're probably going to finish ahead of us for '13, it's not the end of the world.

Their latest commit, 6'8" PF Richard Armadi, is an NR JC kid who'll have 1 yr of eligibility in 13-14. It sounds like he might be under the radar but I don't think he's going to strike fear in the hearts of other frontlines in the Big 12.

Iowa St was good last year(they beat us twice, finished ahead of us in league), they're probably going to be good into the near future at least. Hoiberg has done a very good rebuilding their program but it's not like it's just coming out of nowhere. It's also not like they're some insurmountable juggernaut that we won't have any ability to compete with. In several instances, we're competing for the same talent(Vitto Brown and Hassan Martin). Embrace the challenge of competing with them.

sorry for picking the wrong point in time to be bothered by the fact that iowa state appears to be recruiting much better than we are and adding more talent to their program than we are.

You mean just like they have the past couple years?

yes. iowa state did not really concern me that much at first because most of the incoming talent appeared to be transfers, which i did not feel was sustainable and as such did not worry much about it. the current and very recent highschool recruiting however does concern me because it seems like a pattern is developing.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #107 on: September 11, 2012, 03:26:51 PM »
So I'm glad we got Marcus Foster, based off everything I've read and seen about him, I think his game is pretty similar to Marcus Denmon's, I hope Foster can produce at the same level for KSU that Denmon was able to for Missouri.

I think this commit gives us so momentum to finish off the rest of this class, which will not be a Top 25 national class, but could feature some very solid pieces for a very competitive team down the road.

If you're worried about Iowa St. passing us, that should have happened when they were able to bring in Royce White, Chris Allen, Anthony Booker, and Korie Lucious. Some may have considered bringing in all those transfers a risk, but guess what, all those guys can play and they proved it last year(Lucious will get his shot this year), grats to Hoiberg for not getting in their way. They've also done a good job bringing in 4* Georges Niang and 3* Sherron Dorsey-Walker in last year's class.

Even before Frank left, they were going to finish ahead of us in the rankings for the Class of '12. They're probably going to finish ahead of us for '13, it's not the end of the world.

Their latest commit, 6'8" PF Richard Armadi, is an NR JC kid who'll have 1 yr of eligibility in 13-14. It sounds like he might be under the radar but I don't think he's going to strike fear in the hearts of other frontlines in the Big 12.

Iowa St was good last year(they beat us twice, finished ahead of us in league), they're probably going to be good into the near future at least. Hoiberg has done a very good rebuilding their program but it's not like it's just coming out of nowhere. It's also not like they're some insurmountable juggernaut that we won't have any ability to compete with. In several instances, we're competing for the same talent(Vitto Brown and Hassan Martin). Embrace the challenge of competing with them.

sorry for picking the wrong point in time to be bothered by the fact that iowa state appears to be recruiting much better than we are and adding more talent to their program than we are.

You mean just like they have the past couple years?

yes. iowa state did not really concern me that much at first because most of the incoming talent appeared to be transfers, which i did not feel was sustainable and as such did not worry much about it. the current and very recent highschool recruiting however does concern me because it seems like a pattern is developing.

Right, but that doesn't mean "it's over" for KSU by any means.

Landing Foster is a big step in the right direction.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #108 on: September 11, 2012, 03:27:43 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.

McGruder was a pretty damn solid 4* recruit. Watching the DCA play in Manhattan a couple years back, it wouldn't have been out of the question to think McGruder was the better prospect than Judge, at least the safer bet to succeed. McGruder won FL POY in their HS classification during their  SR yr.

At the same stage of their careers, McGruder > Foster. But I'm still on high on Foster and think he can develop into a very solid if not all-conference type player by the time he's done at KSU.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88612
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #109 on: September 11, 2012, 03:29:12 PM »
I feel good that it was AB3 landing this kid. He was kind of the unknown in the staff.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55967
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #110 on: September 11, 2012, 03:34:24 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.


Don't forget about Shane and Nino and Nick Russell (all top 150). I'm sure Foster is better than all of them by quite a bit, but still.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #111 on: September 11, 2012, 03:44:22 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.


Don't forget about Shane and Nino and Nick Russell (all top 150). I'm sure Foster is better than all of them by quite a bit, but still.

Hey, thanks for the reminder mc, I'm glad you still care.  :thumbs:

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #112 on: September 11, 2012, 03:47:52 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.

McGruder was a pretty damn solid 4* recruit. Watching the DCA play in Manhattan a couple years back, it wouldn't have been out of the question to think McGruder was the better prospect than Judge, at least the safer bet to succeed. McGruder won FL POY in their HS classification during their  SR yr.

At the same stage of their careers, McGruder > Foster. But I'm still on high on Foster and think he can develop into a very solid if not all-conference type player by the time he's done at KSU.

Foster is vastly underrated if he can make a quick and easy transition to a true combo guard, if not he might be correctly rated around the top 150 mark. Also, foster might not be done growing which is as huge bonus.

Offline KsJoey

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #113 on: September 11, 2012, 03:56:04 PM »
Speaking of size, does anybody know for sure how big Foster really is?  Some places list 6'0" 155lbs, and others 6'2-6'3 185lbs.

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #114 on: September 11, 2012, 04:01:07 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.


Don't forget about Shane and Nino and Nick Russell (all top 150). I'm sure Foster is better than all of them by quite a bit, but still.

not to mention sutton & mcgruder.  Also, transfers count.  ( Kelly)

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #115 on: September 11, 2012, 04:08:51 PM »
Speaking of size, does anybody know for sure how big Foster really is?  Some places list 6'0" 155lbs, and others 6'2-6'3 185lbs.

6'3 wouldn't be surprised if he makes it to 6'4.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #116 on: September 11, 2012, 04:12:29 PM »
Speaking of size, does anybody know for sure how big Foster really is?  Some places list 6'0" 155lbs, and others 6'2-6'3 185lbs.

That ESPN profile (6'0" 155) is from when they 1st evaluated him back in 2010, they need to update it. Everything recent on Foster has him in the 6'2"-6'3" 185-200 range.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55967
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #117 on: September 11, 2012, 04:40:30 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.


Don't forget about Shane and Nino and Nick Russell (all top 150). I'm sure Foster is better than all of them by quite a bit, but still.

not to mention sutton & mcgruder.  Also, transfers count.  ( Kelly)

so other than clemente, kelly, sutton, mcgruder, nino, diaz, russell, shane, beasley, and walker....Foster will most likely have a higher ranking than every Frank recruit ever signed. Why aren't more people poppin bottles?

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40561
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #118 on: September 11, 2012, 04:45:30 PM »
RUIII signed right?

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #119 on: September 11, 2012, 04:56:46 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.


Don't forget about Shane and Nino and Nick Russell (all top 150). I'm sure Foster is better than all of them by quite a bit, but still.

not to mention sutton & mcgruder.  Also, transfers count.  ( Kelly)

so other than clemente, kelly, sutton, mcgruder, nino, diaz, russell, shane, beasley, and walker....Foster will most likely have a higher ranking than every Frank recruit ever signed. Why aren't more people poppin bottles?

yeah.  I like the Foster commit no doubt, but the revisionist history about the recruits Frank brought in is pointless.  Also,  while the '14 mentions look promising, Webers '12 & '13 recruiting have been abysmal.  Foster as the far and away best looking recruit in 2 classes doesn't speak well.  And there looks to be a huge gaping hole in talent that will rear itself in a couple of years if recruiting doesn't improve in a big rough ridin' hurry.  In short, things are going pretty much how everyone expected.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #120 on: September 11, 2012, 05:07:39 PM »
ESPN RATINGS

2007
Michael Beasley  (1st PF)   98
Jake Pullen   (16th PG)   93
Dom Sutton    POST
Fred Brown  (85th SG)  76
Ron Anderson (179th PF)  71
Andre Gilbert    JC

2008
Jordan Henriquez (16th C) 91
Abdul Herrera   JC
Buchi Awaji JC

2009
Wally Judge  (4th PF) 97
Devon Peterson JC
Jordan Henriquez  POST
Rodney McGruder (33rd SG) 89
Nike Russell (38th SG) 89
Martavious  Irving (72nd SG) 86

2010
Freddy Asprilla  JC
Shane Southwell (21st SF) 92
Nino Williams (35th SF)90
Will Spradling  (55th PG)88
Jeuvol Myles  JC

2011
Adrian Diaz (20th C)  90
Thomas Gipson  (31st PF)  90
Angel Rodriquez (35th PG) 90
Jeremy Jones JC
Omari Lawrence JC
James Watson JC

2012
Micheal Orris (22nd PG) 89
Darrel Johnson (86th PF) 85

2013
Marcus Foster (27th PG) 80
Alex Etherington (112th SF) 64


FRANK
PG = 16, 55, 35
SG = 85, 33, 38, 72
SF = 21, 35
PF = 1, 179, 4, 31
C = 16, 20

oscar
PG = 22, 27
SG =
SF = 112
PF = 86
C =

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #121 on: September 11, 2012, 05:12:20 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.


Don't forget about Shane and Nino and Nick Russell (all top 150). I'm sure Foster is better than all of them by quite a bit, but still.

not to mention sutton & mcgruder.  Also, transfers count.  ( Kelly)

so other than clemente, kelly, sutton, mcgruder, nino, diaz, russell, shane, beasley, and walker....Foster will most likely have a higher ranking than every Frank recruit ever signed. Why aren't more people poppin bottles?

yeah.  I like the Foster commit no doubt, but the revisionist history about the recruits Frank brought in is pointless.  Also,  while the '14 mentions look promising, Webers '12 & '13 recruiting have been abysmal.  Foster as the far and away best looking recruit in 2 classes doesn't speak well.  And there looks to be a huge gaping hole in talent that will rear itself in a couple of years if recruiting doesn't improve in a big rough ridin' hurry.  In short, things are going pretty much how everyone expected.

What revisionist history?

The only reference to Frank's recruiting in this thread is that Iowa St. has brought in better talent in the past couple years, meaning classes of 2011-2013.

And no, it hasn't demonstrably been better and no it doesn't mean they have completely surpassed us, but it is what it is.

If KSU is going to be competitive in the upper half of the league in coming years, we're going to have land some higher caliber prospects in future classes. No one is denying that.

Landing Foster, a potential difference maker, at least gives Weber's recruiting some optimism. I'm not going to piss on that.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47962
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #122 on: September 11, 2012, 05:41:36 PM »
people are actually defending frank's recruiting in an effort to disparage oscar's

awesome

:lol:


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #123 on: September 11, 2012, 05:44:02 PM »

You mean just like they have the past couple years?


Yeah, aside from Beasley, Walker, and Judge, Foster is every bit as good, if not better, than any commit in the Huggs/Frank era.  Frank had some nice transfers (Denis).  But, in terms of highschool prospects, I believe Gip was probably one of the highest rated players Frank ever brought in.   

Gip and Diaz were ranked in the 140s according to Rivals.


Don't forget about Shane and Nino and Nick Russell (all top 150). I'm sure Foster is better than all of them by quite a bit, but still.

not to mention sutton & mcgruder.  Also, transfers count.  ( Kelly)

so other than clemente, kelly, sutton, mcgruder, nino, diaz, russell, shane, beasley, and walker....Foster will most likely have a higher ranking than every Frank recruit ever signed. Why aren't more people poppin bottles?

yeah.  I like the Foster commit no doubt, but the revisionist history about the recruits Frank brought in is pointless.  Also,  while the '14 mentions look promising, Webers '12 & '13 recruiting have been abysmal.  Foster as the far and away best looking recruit in 2 classes doesn't speak well.  And there looks to be a huge gaping hole in talent that will rear itself in a couple of years if recruiting doesn't improve in a big rough ridin' hurry.  In short, things are going pretty much how everyone expected.

What revisionist history?

The only reference to Frank's recruiting in this thread is that Iowa St. has brought in better talent in the past couple years, meaning classes of 2011-2013.

And no, it hasn't demonstrably been better and no it doesn't mean they have completely surpassed us, but it is what it is.

If KSU is going to be competitive in the upper half of the league in coming years, we're going to have land some higher caliber prospects in future classes. No one is denying that.

Landing Foster, a potential difference maker, at least gives Weber's recruiting some optimism. I'm not going to piss on that.

Not talking about the Iowa St stuff.  Just the idea mentioned above that Foster is as good, or better, than any Frank recruit that wasn't a 5-star out of highschool, which just struck me as silly.  Very happy about the Foster commitment, just hopeful that it's an inflection point rather than a relative maximum.  Know what I mean?

   

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: OFFICIAL WELCOME MARCUS FOSTER THREAD
« Reply #124 on: September 11, 2012, 05:46:26 PM »
people are actually defending frank's recruiting in an effort to disparage oscar's

awesome

:lol:
Yeah, how sad does that make oscar's?

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2