RANKINGS...

[KITNfury]

Nobody here is arguing in favor of tOSU or Michigan State bro

[The Big Train]

all this guy wants is validation.  idk why he is trying to get it here, he can get a completely biased and full helping by just watching ESPN for 3 min

[star seed 7]

Remember when ku went 1-11 with the hardest schedule in fbs? Man, they really deserved consideration for the playoff, what a tough schedule!

[Asteriskhead]

Are we mad about our not that good team being ranked not that high today? I would like to shake my fist at the ESPN machine.

[Emo EMAW]

A 1 loss Big 10 champion is getting in before some 2+ loss SEC team that couldn't even win their division.

[MadCat]

  irregardlessly

[Rage Against the McKee]

I would trade our games at Baylor, West Virginia and TCU for games at Alabama, Ole Miss, and Georgia in a heart beat.

[sonofdaxjones]

I would trade our games at Baylor, West Virginia and TCU for games at Alabama, Ole Miss, and Georgia in a heart beat.

[MixBerryCrunch]

Sorry, Sad Sak, there isn't a chance a two loss Auburn gets in over any other 1 loss conference champion.  crap would hit the fan if that happened.

[CHONGS]

actually sak would argue that a three loss Auburn should get in over any other 1-loss champion!

[MadCat]

sak is good at arguing unless you know his achilles heel...which is apparently Michigan State.

[sak]

I would trade our games at Baylor, West Virginia and TCU for games at Alabama, Ole Miss, and Georgia in a heart beat.

you do realize alabama beat west virginia, right?

[ChiComCat]

I would trade our games at Baylor, West Virginia and TCU for games at Alabama, Ole Miss, and Georgia in a heart beat.

you do realize alabama beat west virginia, right?

You're missing the point

[sak]

I would trade our games at Baylor, West Virginia and TCU for games at Alabama, Ole Miss, and Georgia in a heart beat.

you do realize alabama beat west virginia, right?

You're missing the point

what was the point? i thought it was that Baylor/West Virginia/TCU were tougher road games than Alabama/Ole Miss/Georgia.

[Winters]

I would trade our games at Baylor, West Virginia and TCU for games at Alabama, Ole Miss, and Georgia in a heart beat.

you do realize alabama beat west virginia, right?

You're missing the point

what was the point? i thought it was that Baylor/West Virginia/TCU were tougher road games than Alabama/Ole Miss/Georgia.

You don't get it

[BIG APPLE CAT]

sak really bringin the "law of transitive property of victory" smack and nobody can do anything about it.  FACTS, DORKS!

[sak]

sak really bringin the "law of transitive property of victory" smack and nobody can do anything about it.  FACTS, DORKS!

what part of auburn beating kansas state on your own field involves the transitive property? if kstate and west virginia had beaten auburn and alabama respectively, and baylor had done something... ANYTHING... of note in nonconference play, it would be the big 12 with a logjam of teams in the top 10 instead of the SEC West.

[Cire]

2 loss teams shouldn't get in if a team they lost to is in.

[sak]

2 loss teams shouldn't get in if a team they lost to is in.

why? because losing to a team in the top 4 automatically means you can't be one of the 4 best teams in the country?

so hypothetically speaking if a team plays the most brutal schedule in the history of the sport and go 2-2 against the top 8, they shouldn't get in, just because one of the teams they lost to is in? what about if they've beaten 1 or even 2 of the other 3 supposedly "in" teams.

[Rage Against the McKee]

2 loss teams shouldn't get in if a team they lost to is in.

why? because losing to a team in the top 4 automatically means you can't be one of the 4 best teams in the country?

so hypothetically speaking if a team plays the most brutal schedule in the history of the sport and go 2-2 against the top 8, they shouldn't get in, just because one of the teams they lost to is in? what about if they've beaten 1 or even 2 of the other 3 supposedly "in" teams.

Maybe they shouldn't have been dumbasses with their scheduling.

[BIG APPLE CAT]

2 loss teams shouldn't get in if a team they lost to is in.

why? because losing to a team in the top 4 automatically means you can't be one of the 4 best teams in the country?

so hypothetically speaking if a team plays the most brutal schedule in the history of the sport and go 2-2 against the top 8, they shouldn't get in, just because one of the teams they lost to is in? what about if they've beaten 1 or even 2 of the other 3 supposedly "in" teams.

maybe if they were actually that good they wouldn't have lost so many games?  Just spit ballin here.  Full disclosure: I am not one of the 12 committee members.

[Jabeez]

All sak is saying is:  Teams can improve and one bad game isn't totally indicitive of that team; As long as that team plays in the only conference where parity and good football can exist,   the SEC.

[kslim]

Every team in the sec w will have a minimum of two losses

[CNS]

every power conf should have their champ represented in a form of playoffs.  As long as that is an odd number, the top two should be represented.

All of this is IMO, of course.

[millertime]

What it should be this year, is the conference champs of the Big 12, Pac 12, and SEC should be in. Then if FSU goes undefeated they get in, if not then Notre Dame if they win out can compete with other 1 loss teams that didn't win their conference.