Author Topic: Your Week One KSU National Statistical Rankings . . . (Read 3107 times)

sonofdaxjones · « **on:** September 04, 2012, 05:39:17 AM »

brought to by: #LouisvilleforBig12
http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?year=2012&org=327

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1 on:** September 04, 2012, 05:42:03 AM »

Your next opponent statistical rankings.

Brought to you by: #goemawdumbassesforPanhandleAggie
http://web1.ncaa.org/football/exec/rankingSummary?org=415&year=2012&week=1

steve dave · « **Reply #2 on:** September 04, 2012, 06:15:15 AM »

You're really mad that nobody likes Louisville huh Dax

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #3 on:** September 04, 2012, 06:41:11 AM »

Institutional Control · « **Reply #4 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:15:35 AM »

Hard to believe that a 44 yard punt return average is not #1.

wes mantooth · « **Reply #5 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:19:39 AM »

sonofbutthurtjones

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #6 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:26:14 AM »

Anything to say on the statistics Mantooth?

:tapping

wes mantooth · « **Reply #7 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:27:03 AM »

didn't look at them. statistics are for losers. especially after 1 game.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #8 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:42:12 AM »

Quote from: wes mantooth on September 04, 2012, 07:27:03 AM

didn't look at them. statistics are for losers. especially after 1 game.

So, low level government desk job then?

pissclams · « **Reply #9 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:44:36 AM »

i just broke down those numbers and if my calculations are correct, and they usually are, we are going to have zero problem dismantling the canes in week 2.

lets wait and see how it all shakes out, but the miami hurricanes could be in for quite a surprise this weekend in mhk.

wes mantooth · « **Reply #10 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:46:30 AM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on September 04, 2012, 07:42:12 AM

Quote from: wes mantooth on September 04, 2012, 07:27:03 AM
didn't look at them. statistics are for losers. especially after 1 game.

So, low level government desk job then?

i'm too cool for school for your stats or your gov desk job butthurtjones

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #11 on:** September 04, 2012, 07:53:01 AM »

Quote from: wes mantooth on September 04, 2012, 07:46:30 AM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on September 04, 2012, 07:42:12 AM
Quote from: wes mantooth on September 04, 2012, 07:27:03 AM
didn't look at them. statistics are for losers. especially after 1 game.

So, low level government desk job then?

i'm too cool for school for your stats or your gov desk job butthurtjones

Nope, sorry.

MadCat · « **Reply #12 on:** September 04, 2012, 09:55:13 AM »

Quote from: CFoD on September 04, 2012, 07:15:35 AM

Hard to believe that a 44 yard punt return average is not #1.

Going to guess that Northwestern had a single punt return for 67 yards.

raquetcat · « **Reply #13 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:02:02 AM »

73rd ranked defense seems about right, I would guess at the end of the year we are +/-10 from that number, unless we magically develop a pass rush

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #14 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:24:19 AM »

Quote from: raquetcat on September 04, 2012, 10:02:02 AM

73rd ranked defense seems about right, I would guess at the end of the year we are +/-10 from that number, unless we magically develop a pass rush

We will finish much better than 73rd because our offense will keep our defense off the field.

pissclams · « **Reply #15 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:30:43 AM »

well there is no magic ball you can stare into and predict the future with (i wish there was), but according to some of the numbers that i just ran, ksu is going to be looking very good against an overmatched miami team.

hemmy · « **Reply #16 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:33:53 AM »

Quote from: pissclams on September 04, 2012, 10:30:43 AM

well there is no magic ball you can stare into and predict the future with (i wish there was), but according to some of the numbers that i just ran, ksu is going to be looking very good against an overmatched miami team.

Were these numbers run through chingon's computer?

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #17 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:35:04 AM »

I just proofed clam's numbers and, I hate to say it, they are pretty well supported. His analysis indicates that the Hurricanes may have a real fight on their hands this weekend\, and I don't have a lot of statistics that disagree with him.

pissclams · « **Reply #18 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:38:23 AM »

look fellas, i'm not here making promises. what i am here to do is just discuss the numbers that my system has kicked out and by all accounts, the numbers look good. really good. numbers can change and sometimes they get kicked out the wrong way after being ran but we'll see in a few days. go ksu.

Institutional Control · « **Reply #19 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:41:18 AM »

My prediction, KSU 54.5 Miami 4

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #20 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:41:48 AM »

Quote from: pissclams on September 04, 2012, 10:38:23 AM

look fellas, i'm not here making promises. what i am here to do is just discuss the numbers that my system has kicked out and by all accounts, the numbers look good. really good. numbers can change and sometimes they get kicked out the wrong way after being ran but we'll see in a few days. go ksu.

None of us can predict the future and I don't have a time machine (yet!) BUT if you conduct a careful analysis of the data we are presented with currently vis-a-vis the Miami University stats, and we can provide an informed analysis.

pissclams · « **Reply #21 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:44:22 AM »

i'd love to know what set of numbers you're working with limestone.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #22 on:** September 04, 2012, 10:48:20 AM »

Quote from: pissclams on September 04, 2012, 10:44:22 AM

i'd love to know what set of numbers you're working with limestone.

I am using a large portion of your numbers, but taking it a few steps further to account for some variables that the raw data cannot account for.

I think Coach Golden's team will be in for quite a wake up call Saturday morning in Manhattan

DQ12 · « **Reply #23 on:** September 04, 2012, 11:42:38 AM »

This is all fascinating stuff. I'm absolutely floored by the technology that exists today.

Keep up the good work, 'Clams, 'Stone.

Institutional Control · « **Reply #24 on:** September 04, 2012, 12:06:51 PM »

As an expert in predictive analytics, I can confirm Limestone's algorithmic formula to be accurate 99.8435321385994% of the time.