Author Topic: Record Gas Prices . . (Read 23454 times)

nicname · « **Reply #125 on:** January 10, 2015, 09:19:17 PM »

Quote from: 8manpick on September 27, 2012, 11:27:53 AM

Quote from: HeinBallz on September 27, 2012, 11:14:27 AM
Gas going from 1.50 to 3.50 in 4 years hardly quantifies as hyper inflation - just as the changes you've seen in gold prices don't.

Interesting time choice, since 4 years and a few months ago, gas was more expensive than it is today.

The post and image in it are pretty

right now.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #126 on:** January 10, 2015, 09:31:57 PM »

People voting based upon, and politicians taking credit for or blaming others for gas prices, is like the most bottom feeding lowest common denominator thing in politics.

How many times did Obama tap into the spr for this purpose? Remember when michelle bachman ran on it? Nancy Pelosi indicted "big oil" to testify about it

All pathetic

06wildcat · « **Reply #127 on:** January 11, 2015, 08:26:30 AM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 10, 2015, 09:31:57 PM

People voting based upon, and politicians taking credit for or blaming others for gas prices, is like the most bottom feeding lowest common denominator thing in politics.

How many times did Obama tap into the spr for this purpose? Remember when michelle bachman ran on it? Nancy Pelosi indicted "big oil" to testify about it

All pathetic

I do wonder how much longer gasoline price will be a political football now that supply isn't much of an issue above $80/ barrel or so.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #128 on:** January 11, 2015, 11:02:40 AM »

Quote from: 06wildcat on January 11, 2015, 08:26:30 AM

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 10, 2015, 09:31:57 PM
People voting based upon, and politicians taking credit for or blaming others for gas prices, is like the most bottom feeding lowest common denominator thing in politics.

How many times did Obama tap into the spr for this purpose? Remember when michelle bachman ran on it? Nancy Pelosi indicted "big oil" to testify about it

All pathetic

I do wonder how much longer gasoline price will be a political football now that supply isn't much of an issue above $80/ barrel or so.

It's been way cheaper before, so probably never. We'll just see some of this nonsense shifted to other bullshit things like free junior college / ITT tech, or "closing the wage gap" and similar platitudes.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #129 on:** January 11, 2015, 11:51:30 AM »

I haven't seen obummer taking much of a victory lap except crapping on Keystone

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #130 on:** January 11, 2015, 06:30:51 PM »

Good to see the usual suspects missed the point...as usual

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #131 on:** January 11, 2015, 08:40:38 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 11, 2015, 06:30:51 PM

Good to see the usual suspects missed the point...as usual

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What's the point?

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #132 on:** January 11, 2015, 09:12:31 PM »

Politics

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #133 on:** January 11, 2015, 09:22:59 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 11, 2015, 09:12:31 PM

Politics

I know you fancy yourself a better writer than that.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #134 on:** January 11, 2015, 09:27:31 PM »

The idiocy of a politician trying to make political capital out of gas prices . . . then again, I look back at the Dems getting Congress in 2006 and then the Whitehouse in 2008 as one protracted series of political fails, with a few exceptions.

john "teach me how to" dougie · « **Reply #135 on:** January 11, 2015, 09:55:12 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 11, 2015, 11:51:30 AM

I haven't seen obummer taking much of a victory lap except crapping on Keystone

I bet he's super pissed about the low gas prices.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #136 on:** January 12, 2015, 08:57:26 AM »

Quote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 11, 2015, 09:55:12 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 11, 2015, 11:51:30 AM
I haven't seen obummer taking much of a victory lap except crapping on Keystone

I bet he's super pissed about the low gas prices.

Dax thinks he will exploit for his political gain.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #137 on:** January 12, 2015, 09:31:48 AM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 11, 2015, 09:27:31 PM

The idiocy of a politician trying to make political capital out of gas prices . . . then again, I look back at the Dems getting Congress in 2006 and then the Whitehouse in 2008 as one protracted series of political fails, with a few exceptions.

I guess he isn't a friend to Big Oil after all.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #138 on:** January 12, 2015, 09:34:59 AM »

Remember the 2014 debate with Romney where Obama was trying to take credit for the boom domestic oil production, and Romney was like, "are you rough ridin' kidding with that bullshit?"

So pathetic.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #139 on:** January 12, 2015, 09:37:12 AM »

Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on January 12, 2015, 09:31:48 AM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 11, 2015, 09:27:31 PM
The idiocy of a politician trying to make political capital out of gas prices . . . then again, I look back at the Dems getting Congress in 2006 and then the Whitehouse in 2008 as one protracted series of political fails, with a few exceptions.

I guess he isn't a friend to Big Oil after all.

Your ignorance shines through.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #140 on:** January 12, 2015, 10:39:40 AM »

The irony is that politicians could have at least a marginal impact on gas prices by boosting domestic production on federal land and easing constraints on distribution. Obama has done the opposite of that, but fortunately production on private land is booming, coupled with weakerer global demand.

john "teach me how to" dougie · « **Reply #141 on:** January 12, 2015, 12:05:29 PM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 12, 2015, 10:39:40 AM

The irony is that politicians could have at least a marginal impact on gas prices by boosting domestic production on federal land and easing constraints on distribution. Obama has done the opposite of that, but fortunately production on private land is booming, coupled with weakerer global demand.

Yes, oil prices have come down in spite of Obama policies. He would prefer $10 per gallon gas.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #142 on:** January 12, 2015, 12:08:31 PM »

So the high prices were his fault, low prices aren't his? Fair

bubbles4ksu · « **Reply #143 on:** January 12, 2015, 12:24:29 PM »

i can't wait till he destroys them on keystone and gas drops below $1.50

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #144 on:** January 12, 2015, 12:32:28 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 12, 2015, 12:08:31 PM

So the high prices were his fault, low prices aren't his? Fair

Like, nobody is saying that.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #145 on:** January 12, 2015, 12:33:33 PM »

Quote from: bubbles4ksu on January 12, 2015, 12:24:29 PM

i can't wait till he destroys them on keystone and gas drops below $1.50

If he opposes keystone (which only a complete Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) would oppose) the republicans win. If he supports it the republicans win.

bubbles4ksu · « **Reply #146 on:** January 12, 2015, 12:38:24 PM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 12, 2015, 12:33:33 PM

Quote from: bubbles4ksu on January 12, 2015, 12:24:29 PM
i can't wait till he destroys them on keystone and gas drops below $1.50

If he opposes keystone (which only a complete Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) would oppose) the republicans win. If he supports it the republicans win.

so pathetic. small government conservatives want the governor of nebraska to use his eminent domain power to take land from farmers and give it to a foreign corporation to transport a foreign product to houston for export. ONLY A COMPLETE Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) WOULD OPPOSE. lol you rough ridin' idiots.

nicname · « **Reply #147 on:** January 12, 2015, 04:22:41 PM »

Smashing.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #148 on:** January 12, 2015, 06:41:32 PM »

Dugout should probably just quit this thread.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #149 on:** January 12, 2015, 07:48:29 PM »

Quote from: bubbles4ksu on January 12, 2015, 12:38:24 PM

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 12, 2015, 12:33:33 PM
Quote from: bubbles4ksu on January 12, 2015, 12:24:29 PM
i can't wait till he destroys them on keystone and gas drops below $1.50

If he opposes keystone (which only a complete Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) would oppose) the republicans win. If he supports it the republicans win.
so pathetic. small government conservatives want the governor of nebraska to use his eminent domain power to take land from farmers and give it to a foreign corporation to transport a foreign product to houston for export. ONLY A COMPLETE Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) WOULD OPPOSE. lol you rough ridin' idiots.

Because in your brain small government conservative means anarchist, and a two thousand mile pipeline with terminals all over the Midwest is nothing more than a McDonald's straw rammed into the ground in Canada and poking back out in the gulf, transporting oil our economy won't use and refined somewhere else in the world, I'll allow this. Basically, because you are a huge Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) who drinks copious amounts of libtard Kool aid.