Author Topic: Aurora Shooting  (Read 64795 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16748
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #250 on: July 26, 2012, 04:53:09 PM »
With three minutes to go before noms are announced, I got a great feeling this is gonna win a csourk'y for worst thread top to bottom, gang.   :thumbs:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline shivvyman

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 325
  • Hates All Races Equally
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #251 on: July 26, 2012, 04:57:19 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this moron did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.




Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #252 on: July 26, 2012, 04:57:51 PM »
Yeah. I'm surprised this thread hasn't been dragged out and shot at by now. :punintended:

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #253 on: July 26, 2012, 04:59:26 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this respect did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

This is the worst post of the thread.

Offline shivvyman

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 325
  • Hates All Races Equally
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #254 on: July 26, 2012, 05:00:50 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this respect did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

This is the worst post of the thread.

Sadly, you are unable to disprove any of the above comments.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16963
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #255 on: July 26, 2012, 05:02:38 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this moron did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

Brownback wins, Fully Automatic Weapons Now Legal
Kansas Governor states that with new bill, bad guys' aim will be "sky high," streets now safer

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #256 on: July 26, 2012, 05:05:54 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this respect did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

This is the worst post of the thread.

Sadly, you are unable to disprove any of the above comments.

Pretty sure no one thinks he had a full auto AR. Everyone knows it was legally purchased. A rifle is much more powerful than a handgun. His 100rd drum jammed. Full auto would have been way worse (except for maybe jamming sooner). He doesnt have to be accurate spamming a sold out movie theater.


Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #257 on: July 26, 2012, 05:07:32 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this moron did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

Brownback wins, Fully Automatic Weapons Now Legal
Kansas Governor states that with new bill, bad guys' aim will be "sky high," streets now safer

 :lol:




the universe will not be in balance until this thread is banished to the pit.

Offline shivvyman

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 325
  • Hates All Races Equally
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #258 on: July 26, 2012, 05:23:56 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this moron did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

Brownback wins, Fully Automatic Weapons Now Legal
Kansas Governor states that with new bill, bad guys' aim will be "sky high," streets now safer

Have you ever shot an AR on full auto? This kid hadn't, and if you've ever watched somebody shoot on full auto for the first time, you would certainly notice the kick drives the nose of the weapon up until you have to stop shooting and reset.


Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #259 on: July 26, 2012, 05:25:30 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this moron did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

Brownback wins, Fully Automatic Weapons Now Legal
Kansas Governor states that with new bill, bad guys' aim will be "sky high," streets now safer

Have you ever shot an AR on full auto? This kid hadn't, and if you've ever watched somebody shoot on full auto for the first time, you would certainly notice the kick drives the nose of the weapon up until you have to stop shooting and reset.

Were you born a water baby or did something happen to make you as mind-numbingly stupid as you are?

Offline shivvyman

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 325
  • Hates All Races Equally
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #260 on: July 26, 2012, 05:28:33 PM »
Way too many uninformed jackasses posting on this thread.

I haven't read the detailed reports, but I'm near 99% certain the AR our shooter was carrying was not full automatic (since he legally procured the weapon). Everyone here seems to think all assault rifles are capable of shooting full automatic. Most states don't allow the purchase of full auto ARs; only semi-automatic (like a handgun as HB has pointed out numerous times). Those states that do allow the purchase of a full auto AR make it extremely expensive.

A semi-automatic AR is just a more accurate handgun that fires smaller rounds, yet more prone to mechanical failure.

We would have been better off if this moron did have a full auto AR. Most individuals can't shoot for crap on full auto. After the 3rd or 4th round, your aim is usually sky high.

Brownback wins, Fully Automatic Weapons Now Legal
Kansas Governor states that with new bill, bad guys' aim will be "sky high," streets now safer

Have you ever shot an AR on full auto? This kid hadn't, and if you've ever watched somebody shoot on full auto for the first time, you would certainly notice the kick drives the nose of the weapon up until you have to stop shooting and reset.

Were you born a water baby or did something happen to make you as mind-numbingly stupid as you are?

Can you lick your own nuts? My guess is the answer is an emphatic, YES.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #261 on: July 26, 2012, 05:34:36 PM »
So you're arguing that a shotgun is okay because it can also be used for hunting, while a semi-automatic rifle that aestheticly looks dangerous, yet technically isn't much different than something you would shoot a deer with should be illegal...  Yet your preferred method of killing people (home defense) is the same as the aurora killers preferred weapon, a shot gun. 

Why do you refuse to acknowledge that the real issue here is mental illness and not guns?

Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.

I'm not getting my point across very well apparently.  No one with a shotgun or assault rifle is stopping the Aurora shootings because no one is taking one into a theater unless it is to go on a shooting rampage.  I guess I don't see the point of "assault rifles" being available to anyone.  Please, explain the usefulness of these for anything but target practice.

I don't think guns are the issue.  I don't think all guns should be banned.  I am pro-concealed carry being legal, despite the two morons I know that have it.  I think some common sense should be applied.  I see no need for anyone outside the military to have access to many of the high-powered weapons.

Also, I disagree with the automatic mental illness label on all mass shooters. I think there are just some very bad people out there.  Bad people are going to do bad things.  If they do bad things with reduced firepower, the things they do will have less bad consequences.
:adios:

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #262 on: July 26, 2012, 05:54:12 PM »
Have you ever shot an AR on full auto? This kid hadn't, and if you've ever watched somebody shoot on full auto for the first time, you would certainly notice the kick drives the nose of the weapon up until you have to stop shooting and reset.

I used to play shitloads of counterstrike.

Offline shivvyman

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 325
  • Hates All Races Equally
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #263 on: July 26, 2012, 06:04:55 PM »
Have you ever shot an AR on full auto? This kid hadn't, and if you've ever watched somebody shoot on full auto for the first time, you would certainly notice the kick drives the nose of the weapon up until you have to stop shooting and reset.

I used to play shitloads of counterstrike.

Red Alert, Counterstrike? On PC? That game kicked ass back in the 90's.........

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55964
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #264 on: July 26, 2012, 07:04:24 PM »
Is the "people will still kill even if you ban all guns" thing a serious argument?

Online yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13506
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #265 on: July 26, 2012, 07:20:45 PM »
guns dont kill people I do

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Aurora Shooting
« Reply #266 on: July 26, 2012, 08:42:42 PM »
Is the "people will still kill even if you ban all guns" thing a serious argument?
Is the "this guy would not have done as much damage if AR were illegal" a serious argument? 

Why can't anyone explain to me why an AR 15 is more dangerous than a shot gun?


Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.


Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #267 on: July 26, 2012, 08:51:35 PM »
Is the "people will still kill even if you ban all guns" thing a serious argument?
Is the "this guy would not have done as much damage if AR were illegal" a serious argument? 

Why can't anyone explain to me why an AR 15 is more dangerous than a shot gun?


Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.


Not sure about the ar15 specifically, but lack of 100-round clips seems to be one way.
:adios:

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Aurora Shooting
« Reply #268 on: July 26, 2012, 09:12:13 PM »
That hundred round clip saved lives.  They are extremely susceptible to jamming, which is exactly what happened.  More people would have been killed if he had 5 more clips for his hand gun or another shot gun.  Not to mention assault rifles are not for close range; it's more of a "keep people off my property from 100 yard range" type gun.


Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.


Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #269 on: July 26, 2012, 10:07:18 PM »
Then why do ar15's exist if they're worse guns and not any more lethal or accurate or reliable than handguns? 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #270 on: July 26, 2012, 10:12:48 PM »
That hundred round clip saved lives.  They are extremely susceptible to jamming, which is exactly what happened.  More people would have been killed if he had 5 more clips for his hand gun or another shot gun.  Not to mention assault rifles are not for close range; it's more of a "keep people off my property from 100 yard range" type gun.


Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.

It only saved lives because it malfunctioned, that won't always happen.  If some guy has to reload frequently mid-spree, he's not going to get as many shots off.
:adios:

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Aurora Shooting
« Reply #271 on: July 26, 2012, 10:22:31 PM »
What part of highly susceptible to jamming do you not understand?


Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.


Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #272 on: July 26, 2012, 10:23:10 PM »
hundred round clip 4 hero of america

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #273 on: July 26, 2012, 10:27:18 PM »
What part of highly susceptible to jamming do you not understand?


Sent from my iPhone using DealWithItBitches.

I rough ridin' get that. They don't ALWAYS jam, or they wouldn't make them.  Like anything else that is manufactured and sold, the quality will improve and they won't jam as often as they do now, which must be like 98% of the time.
:adios:

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora Shooting
« Reply #274 on: July 26, 2012, 10:32:57 PM »
What an argument.

This gun that is used almost exclusively for mass murder should be legal because they break every once in a while.