0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
tard. the best option is to not vote at all
Quote from: kstatefreak42 on July 07, 2012, 05:11:31 PMQuote from: HeinBallz on July 06, 2012, 11:08:59 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on July 05, 2012, 07:12:19 PMI would be voting for Gary Johnson.Don't be a 'tardSent from my iPhone using TapatalkI know saying this will bring out the die hards. But lets be honest... a vote for ron paul is a wasted vote. He is not going to win period. The best he can do is give a damn "speech" that will be edited and restricted on what he can say. So why not vote for gary johnson and get him in the debate that way the message can continue the message. That way at least there is a Third option instead of the two we are given. I love Ron Paul. Everything he stands for is absolutely golden. But i want to make an impact RIGHT NOW. And Rand is a douche, ron's going to die here soon.....Gary Johnson.tard. the best option is to not vote at all
Quote from: HeinBallz on July 06, 2012, 11:08:59 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on July 05, 2012, 07:12:19 PMI would be voting for Gary Johnson.Don't be a 'tardSent from my iPhone using TapatalkI know saying this will bring out the die hards. But lets be honest... a vote for ron paul is a wasted vote. He is not going to win period. The best he can do is give a damn "speech" that will be edited and restricted on what he can say. So why not vote for gary johnson and get him in the debate that way the message can continue the message. That way at least there is a Third option instead of the two we are given. I love Ron Paul. Everything he stands for is absolutely golden. But i want to make an impact RIGHT NOW. And Rand is a douche, ron's going to die here soon.....Gary Johnson.
Quote from: kstatefreak42 on July 05, 2012, 07:12:19 PMI would be voting for Gary Johnson.Don't be a 'tardSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would be voting for Gary Johnson.
your the tard.
Quote from: p1k3 on July 08, 2012, 04:01:39 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on July 07, 2012, 05:11:31 PMQuote from: HeinBallz on July 06, 2012, 11:08:59 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on July 05, 2012, 07:12:19 PMI would be voting for Gary Johnson.Don't be a 'tardSent from my iPhone using TapatalkI know saying this will bring out the die hards. But lets be honest... a vote for ron paul is a wasted vote. He is not going to win period. The best he can do is give a damn "speech" that will be edited and restricted on what he can say. So why not vote for gary johnson and get him in the debate that way the message can continue the message. That way at least there is a Third option instead of the two we are given. I love Ron Paul. Everything he stands for is absolutely golden. But i want to make an impact RIGHT NOW. And Rand is a douche, ron's going to die here soon.....Gary Johnson.tard. the best option is to not vote at all your the tard. Be a realist here okay? RON IS NOT GOING TO WIN. I know it took me a month or so to really let it sink in. But stop kidding yourself okay pike? your a liberty guy. I like you cool. But to not vote at all? Thats a tard move. Because then you cant complain about what your getting. Obviously we know what we are getting with Mitt and Barack, but Gary Johnson on the other hand... is a libertarian... so why nnot cast a vote for somebody who is a viable candidate who can win. Paul has a slim chance to none to win. And even if he does make more headway its not going to be much. And dont say I do not support paul or any other thing like that because Im sure I've been posting my ass away about liberty lol. I love the idea just as much as any other paul supporter. I love what Ron Paul has done for MY COUNTRY over the past 30 some years. He is truly a legend and we will look back on Ron Paul as the "OG" of liberty. The freedom movement can make a HUGE statement by voting for Gary Johnson and giving him enough support to be in the debates and letting the douchebag blind sheep Establishment that the freedom movement is no joke.
You guys need to stop with the "Romney and Obama are the same" bullshit. They both may be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), but in exact opposite ways.
Quote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on July 10, 2012, 01:06:08 PMYou guys need to stop with the "Romney and Obama are the same" bullshit. They both may be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), but in exact opposite ways.They are both puppets for the Bilderberg Group. Its really not that hard to figure out they represent the same idea. The Bilderberg Group has been choosing our Presidents for the past 60+ years.
Quote from: kstatefreak42 on July 10, 2012, 03:03:53 PMQuote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on July 10, 2012, 01:06:08 PMYou guys need to stop with the "Romney and Obama are the same" bullshit. They both may be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), but in exact opposite ways.They are both puppets for the Bilderberg Group. Its really not that hard to figure out they represent the same idea. The Bilderberg Group has been choosing our Presidents for the past 60+ years.Yes, the Bilderberg Group decided Barack Hussein Obama should be our president.