How do you propose that an SEC team plays everyone in the SEC? 14 teams. You play all 13 of them for your season? That doesn't make a lot of sense.
I guess I can understand the hate for the SEC (winning breeds coverage and contempt), but Cdub needs to calm down and better educate on why some teams have it easy. The SEC is divided into two divisions, East and West both composed of 7 teams. You play all 6 teams in your division and two out of division games. One of those two games is a traditional opponent (Auburn vs UGA, 'Bama vs Tennessee). The winners of their respective divisions go to Atlanta.
West: Arkansas, Ole Miss, Miss State, Auburn, Alabama, LSU, Texas A&M
East: Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, Mizzou, Vandy, Kentucky, South Carolina
Missouri will never have a season, under the current set up, where they play LSU, Bama and Auburn. They will get their traditional matchup vs a West team (Texas A&M I think) and one out division opponent (this season it was Ole Miss, next season it's Arkansas, jeezus, that's easy).
Right now, because Missouri is in the East, they're having an easier time of it. Georgia and Florida have been decimated by injuries that go above and beyond the average team's hit. South Carolina is good and the rest of the teams (Vandy, Kentucky, Tennessee) SUCK. The West is the dominate division. A long time ago, Tennessee and Florida use to be the national powers that made the East so dominate. It will come back around.
With the divisions set up like this, you have a less likely scenario for them to have met in the regular season. I don't see how that sugar coats it for anyone. How did the Big 12 do it when they actually had 12 teams? Was that some magical recipe that the SEC can't figure out?
The SEC has won the last 7 BCS championships and 9 of the overall 15. The Big 12 has 2 titles. They also have 5 losses in championship games, 3 of which were to SEC schools, oops. Interestingly enough, the Big 12 has never beaten an SEC team in the BCS championship game. I went through all of the Big 12 BCS bowl games wins and it doesn't look like a current Big 12 team has ever beaten an SEC team (Nebraska did beat UT a long time ago). And guess what, we actually provide some variety in our title wins. Bama, Auburn, Florida, Tennessee and LSU won those titles. We don't just lean on our top two teams.
Pulling up an old article (2012), it seems that the SEC is going off at a nearly 65 win percentage over the Big 12 in head to heads the last 15 years.
In the BCS era, the SEC has gone to 25 BCS bowl games, they've won 17 of them (.680). The Big 12 has gone to 20, they've won 9 (.450).
What else do you need to understand why the SEC is seen as the best? The numbers don't lie, just you to yourself. I don't think I would ever come in here and talk smack about how the SEC is a better basketball conference than the Big 12 without doing some research first (thank goodness for Kentucky).