Author Topic: George Zimmerman is a piece of crap (Read 199616 times)

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1075 on:** July 03, 2013, 10:13:12 AM »

This is awful. They tried to do a remote Skype and everyone kept calling the dude and it kept interrupting the call.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #1076 on:** July 03, 2013, 10:42:12 AM »

Quote from: Brock Landers on July 03, 2013, 09:56:54 AM

Quote from: Emo EMAW on July 03, 2013, 09:39:05 AM
He means someone's going Jack Ruby on GZ.
there is an internet rumor that TM's dad was a crip in his younger days

Street justice yo.

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #1077 on:** July 03, 2013, 12:08:09 PM »

Quote from: Wackycat08 on July 03, 2013, 10:13:12 AM

This is awful. They tried to do a remote Skype and everyone kept calling the dude and it kept interrupting the call.

Hahaha, what?

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #1078 on:** July 03, 2013, 12:11:38 PM »

Quote from: SkinnyBenny on July 03, 2013, 12:08:09 PM

Quote from: Wackycat08 on July 03, 2013, 10:13:12 AM
This is awful. They tried to do a remote Skype and everyone kept calling the dude and it kept interrupting the call.

Hahaha, what?

They had one of Zimmermans professors testify over Skype. His Skype was hooked up to his phone and all his dumbass friends tried to call him once they saw him on TV and it kept breaking up the feed. It was hysterical.

EllRobersonisInnocent · « **Reply #1079 on:** July 03, 2013, 12:34:58 PM »

http://deadspin.com/george-zimmerman-trial-interrupted-by-trolls-who-use-sk-658025291

The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep · « **Reply #1080 on:** July 03, 2013, 12:42:26 PM »

Trim · « **Reply #1081 on:** July 03, 2013, 12:51:27 PM »

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #1082 on:** July 03, 2013, 12:57:02 PM »

yoman · « **Reply #1083 on:** July 03, 2013, 01:00:21 PM »

What's a mixture of

and

?

That's how I feel.

'taterblast · « **Reply #1084 on:** July 03, 2013, 01:02:38 PM »

love how the professor was just cheesing the whole time. bizarre situation, because murder trial.

The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep · « **Reply #1085 on:** July 03, 2013, 01:09:46 PM »

CAN WE GET A DIFFERENT LAND LINE?!

OK_Cat · « **Reply #1086 on:** July 03, 2013, 01:19:24 PM »

that was great

i love that the judge(?) or whoever the woman was had no basic understanding of skype.

sys · « **Reply #1087 on:** July 03, 2013, 02:15:33 PM »

Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 08:58:12 AM

I always did a minute or so during closing to explain to any dumbasses that slipped onto the jury what reasonable doubt is. Worked fine. All the bad guys went to prison.

wouldn't work with me. i would doubt everything said, and would have good reason to do so.

Trim · « **Reply #1088 on:** July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM »

Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:15:33 PM

Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 08:58:12 AM
I always did a minute or so during closing to explain to any dumbasses that slipped onto the jury what reasonable doubt is. Worked fine. All the bad guys went to prison.

wouldn't work with me. i would doubt everything said, and would have good reason to do so.

You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

sys · « **Reply #1089 on:** July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM »

Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM

You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.

CNS · « **Reply #1090 on:** July 03, 2013, 03:08:52 PM »

Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM

Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.

Or dumbasses.

DQ12 · « **Reply #1091 on:** July 03, 2013, 03:11:51 PM »

Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM

Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.

How would that dialogue go?

star seed 7 · « **Reply #1092 on:** July 03, 2013, 03:13:01 PM »

Quote from: CNS on July 03, 2013, 03:08:52 PM

Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM
Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.

Or dumbasses.

Don't lawyers specifically look for dumbasses jurors?

CNS · « **Reply #1093 on:** July 03, 2013, 03:15:03 PM »

Quote from: seven on July 03, 2013, 03:13:01 PM

Quote from: CNS on July 03, 2013, 03:08:52 PM
Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM
Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.

Or dumbasses.

Don't lawyers specifically look for dumbasses jurors?

I would. I didn't say exclude them.

Tobias · « **Reply #1094 on:** July 03, 2013, 03:15:19 PM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on July 03, 2013, 03:11:51 PM

Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM
Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.
How would that dialogue go?

Trim · « **Reply #1095 on:** July 03, 2013, 03:15:40 PM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on July 03, 2013, 03:11:51 PM

Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM
Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.
How would that dialogue go?

No words; I profile them. I'm an excellent judge of character.

Trim · « **Reply #1096 on:** July 03, 2013, 03:16:07 PM »

Quote from: seven on July 03, 2013, 03:13:01 PM

Quote from: CNS on July 03, 2013, 03:08:52 PM
Quote from: sys on July 03, 2013, 02:30:34 PM
Quote from: Trim on July 03, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
You're not a dumbass that would slip onto a jury.

lawyers should ask all prospective jurors if they're contrarians.

Or dumbasses.

Don't lawyers specifically look for dumbasses jurors?

Obviously it depends on if you've got the good guys or not.

OregonSmock · « **Reply #1097 on:** July 03, 2013, 04:06:26 PM »

Some big news today from the Zimmerman trial:

1. None of Zimmerman's DNA was found under Martin's fingernails.

2. None of Martin's DNA was found on the murder weapon.

3. None of Zimmerman's DNA was found on Martin's sweatshirt.

Fedor · « **Reply #1098 on:** July 03, 2013, 04:08:16 PM »

Quote from: OregonSmock on July 03, 2013, 04:06:26 PM

Some big news today from the Zimmerman trial:

1. None of Zimmerman's DNA was found under Martin's fingernails.

2. None of Martin's DNA was found on the murder weapon.

3. None of Zimmerman's DNA was found on Martin's sweatshirt.

Not sure you understand why this is actually not big news at all.

OregonSmock · « **Reply #1099 on:** July 03, 2013, 04:32:06 PM »

Quote from: Fedor on July 03, 2013, 04:08:16 PM

Quote from: OregonSmock on July 03, 2013, 04:06:26 PM
Some big news today from the Zimmerman trial:

1. None of Zimmerman's DNA was found under Martin's fingernails.

2. None of Martin's DNA was found on the murder weapon.

3. None of Zimmerman's DNA was found on Martin's sweatshirt.
Not sure you understand why this is actually not big news at all.

wut