George Zimmerman is a piece of crap

[OregonSmock]

He could have turned into a liquid human if he was the bad guy in Terminator 2, dumbasses!

[Cire]

watching the prosecutor's star witness.  I think they are losing.

[EllRobersonisInnocent]

She's been very rude to the defense attorney

[star seed 7]

it's interesting that you guy DO think TM was justified to beat a man just because he called the police about him and kept an eye on him (while doing nothing illegal).

[steve dave]

it's interesting that you guy DO think TM was justified to beat a man just because he called the police about him and kept an eye on him (while doing nothing illegal).

yeah, tons of people have said that exact thing in this thread. good point seven.

[Daddy Claxton]

He would have been armed if he could have grabbed Zimm's gun when he was on top of him beating his ass but he didn't let that happen, dumbasses

great point. and we all know that once a gun is pulled, it must taste blood.

I don't know if it must taste blood, but according to the unrefuted evidence, Martin said that it most certainly was going to.

Don't get me wrong, Zimm sounds like a pos, but I see ERiI's point with regard to the evidence that is there and the standard for finding someone guilty of murder.

[puniraptor]

knock knock

who's there

seven

seven who

seven who thinks people here think TM was justified to beat a man just because he called the police about him and kept an eye on him (while doing nothing illegal)

[steve dave]

He would have been armed if he could have grabbed Zimm's gun when he was on top of him beating his ass but he didn't let that happen, dumbasses

great point. and we all know that once a gun is pulled, it must taste blood.

I don't know if it must taste blood, but according to the unrefuted evidence, Martin said that it most certainly was going to.

Don't get me wrong, Zimm sounds like a pos, but I see ERiI's point with regard to the evidence that is there and the standard for finding someone guilty of murder.

I wasn't aware that he possessed the gun at any point. This is new information for me.

[michigancat]

He would have been armed if he could have grabbed Zimm's gun when he was on top of him beating his ass but he didn't let that happen, dumbasses

great point. and we all know that once a gun is pulled, it must taste blood.

I don't know if it must taste blood, but according to the unrefuted evidence, Martin said that it most certainly was going to.

Don't get me wrong, Zimm sounds like a pos, but I see ERiI's point with regard to the evidence that is there and the standard for finding someone guilty of murder.

yeah, lots of folks (myself included) have said that Zimmerman will probably be found not guilty you dopes.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

If you aren't on your own property, and the guy is unarmed, it would have to be a very extreme case for me to ever be able to justify deadly force.

I've seen the bloody pictures of the front and back of Zimmerman's head, and I've read the interviews of some of the eyewitnesses describing Martin pinning Zimmerman down and punching the crap out of him. Of thats what happened, then it seems pretty extreme to me.

Now, if you're Zimmerman, are you thinking at that point: "golly, I wonder if this is extreme enough for me to shoot this guy?" Probably not. You'd probably shoot him. Or at least you pull your piece and tell him to back the eff off, and pray he doesn't grab it from you. Personally, I'd rather pull the trigger than take that chance.

And please, save the oh so predictable response "we'll I wouldn't have stalked the kid and started a fight with him." Ive not yet seen a shred of evidence that Zimmerman started the physical altercation, and there's nothing wrong with asking a stranger what they're doing in your neighborhood. If there was, this would be a much easier case for the state.

As for the "skittles and ice tea aren't a weapon" tripe, jfc. Martins fists evidently were weapons, unless you're also suggesting Zimmermam did that to himself.

[Pett]

[Paul Moscow]

He would have been armed if he could have grabbed Zimm's gun when he was on top of him beating his ass but he didn't let that happen, dumbasses

great point. and we all know that once a gun is pulled, it must taste blood.

I don't know if it must taste blood, but according to the unrefuted evidence, Martin said that it most certainly was going to.

Don't get me wrong, Zimm sounds like a pos, but I see ERiI's point with regard to the evidence that is there and the standard for finding someone guilty of murder.

yeah, lots of folks (myself included) have said that Zimmerman will probably be found not guilty you dopes.

Yeah, he will get off. Certainly doesn't help anyone's case that all our key witnesses are Floridians.

[star seed 7]

so can we get any of you guys to go on record that TM prolly shouldn't have started beating a man for standing in a courtyard?  seems you guys are trying to paint him as an innocent here.

[michigancat]

If you aren't on your own property, and the guy is unarmed, it would have to be a very extreme case for me to ever be able to justify deadly force.

I've seen the bloody pictures of the front and back of Zimmerman's head, and I've read the interviews of some of the eyewitnesses describing Martin pinning Zimmerman down and punching the crap out of him. Of thats what happened, then it seems pretty extreme to me.

Now, if you're Zimmerman, are you thinking at that point: "golly, I wonder if this is extreme enough for me to shoot this guy?" Probably not. You'd probably shoot him. Or at least you pull your piece and tell him to back the eff off, and pray he doesn't grab it from you. Personally, I'd rather pull the trigger than take that chance.

And please, save the oh so predictable response "we'll I wouldn't have stalked the kid and started a fight with him." Ive not yet seen a shred of evidence that Zimmerman started the physical altercation, and there's nothing wrong with asking a stranger what they're doing in your neighborhood. If there was, this would be a much easier case for the state.

As for the "skittles and ice tea aren't a weapon" tripe, jfc. Martins fists evidently were weapons, unless you're also suggesting Zimmermam did that to himself.

If I'm zimmerman I don't have a gun and I leave him the eff alone after the 911 operator tells me to leave him the eff alone. Actually I probably don't do anything but drive my fat half-hispanic ass home.

[Paul Moscow]

so can we get any of you guys to go on record that TM prolly shouldn't have started beating a man for standing in a courtyard?  seems you guys are trying to paint him as an innocent here.

have you fallen down recently or something?

[steve dave]

so can we get any of you guys to go on record that TM prolly shouldn't have started beating a man for standing in a courtyard?  seems you guys are trying to paint him as an innocent here.

have you fallen down recently or something?

yeah, it's really baffling

[Rage Against the McKee]

so can we get any of you guys to go on record that TM prolly shouldn't have started beating a man for standing in a courtyard?  seems you guys are trying to paint him as an innocent here.

Well, we don't really have any idea what happened since the only witness is a violent, lying, woman beating murderer, but if Trayvon did indeed attack Zimmerman first, I would certainly hope the police would have charged him with misdemeanor assault.

[michigancat]

Let's just go back to the first post of this wonderful thread:

“This is all very unsettling. I’m sure if George Zimmerman had the opportunity to relive Sunday, Feb. 26, he’d probably do things differently. I’m sure Trayvon would, too.”

Yeah, the dead kid probably made a mistake could have handled things differently. It really makes ya think, doesn't it?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

so can we get any of you guys to go on record that TM prolly shouldn't have started beating a man for standing in a courtyard?  seems you guys are trying to paint him as an innocent here.

Well, we don't really have any idea what happened since the only witness is a violent, lying, woman beating murderer, but if Trayvon did indeed attack Zimmerman first, I would certainly hope the police would have charged him with misdemeanor assault.

There are plenty of witnesses to at least portions of the fight. Some are currently testifying for the state. Others will testify for the defense.

[star seed 7]

all this nonsense about how GZ was the only instigator.  oh he shouldn't have had a gun, he shouldn't have gotten out of his car, he shouldn't have called the police on a young child.

yes, all of those things could have probably prevented this.  TM deciding to call the police or go home would have prevented this too.  instead he chose to make the altercation physical.  but all of you pretend that he had no part in getting shot.  TM stays at a distance or calls the police and zimmerman doesn't shoot him (if he did, then zimmerman would be guilty of murder)

my view on people carrying guns is pretty liberal, i don't understand the need for them and don't want people around me carrying me, and i don't think TM deserved to be shot.  but i'm also against beating people, which unfortunately has the consequence of sometimes getting you shot.

[CNS]

The last sentence is silly

[OregonSmock]

so can we get any of you guys to go on record that TM prolly shouldn't have started beating a man for standing in a courtyard?  seems you guys are trying to paint him as an innocent here.

Well, we don't really have any idea what happened since the only witness is a violent, lying, woman beating murderer, but if Trayvon did indeed attack Zimmerman first, I would certainly hope the police would have charged him with misdemeanor assault.

There are plenty of witnesses to at least portions of the fight. Some are currently testifying for the state. Others will testify for the defense.

In that case, it's probably best not to claim anything about the fight as "fact" yet, right?

[Rage Against the McKee]

so can we get any of you guys to go on record that TM prolly shouldn't have started beating a man for standing in a courtyard?  seems you guys are trying to paint him as an innocent here.

Well, we don't really have any idea what happened since the only witness is a violent, lying, woman beating murderer, but if Trayvon did indeed attack Zimmerman first, I would certainly hope the police would have charged him with misdemeanor assault.

There are plenty of witnesses to at least portions of the fight. Some are currently testifying for the state. Others will testify for the defense.

None of them saw how it started. What we do know is that Zimmerman claims he was walking back to his truck but somehow ended up shooting Trayvon in an area that wasn't very near his truck that he had absolutely no business being in.

[bubbles4ksu]

all this nonsense about how GZ was the only instigator.  oh he shouldn't have had a gun, he shouldn't have gotten out of his car, he shouldn't have called the police on a young child.

yes, all of those things could have probably prevented this.  TM deciding to call the police or go home would have prevented this too.  instead he chose to make the altercation physical.  but all of you pretend that he had no part in getting shot.  TM stays at a distance or calls the police and zimmerman doesn't shoot him (if he did, then zimmerman would be guilty of murder)

my view on people carrying guns is pretty liberal, i don't understand the need for them and don't want people around me carrying me, and i don't think TM deserved to be shot.  but i'm also against beating people, which unfortunately has the consequence of sometimes getting you shot.

you forgot to add that drunk girls put themselves in the position to be raped.

[star seed 7]

It's really sad that there are actually people in this country who think that stalking down and murdering an unarmed teenager for "looking suspicious" is somehow justified.

In that case, it's probably best not to claim anything about the fight as "fact" yet, right?

maybe it's best not to claim your first post as "fact" yet, right?