Author Topic: Frank watch 2012:  (Read 359438 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TBL

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2093
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1850 on: March 26, 2012, 01:16:14 PM »
I'm trying to decide how Fatty would be bbsing right now /wet blanket

 :cry:

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1851 on: March 26, 2012, 01:16:22 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.

also, if anyone thinks about attacking k-state prez, you're a clown. schulz is great and his family is awesome (especially the chunky kid with glasses, i think his name is andrew.)

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1852 on: March 26, 2012, 01:17:10 PM »
Welp. Back to 90's and early 00's in bball. And back to the 80's in football in a few years.

 :cry:  I'm crushed.

Offline one/64th

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 74
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1853 on: March 26, 2012, 01:17:14 PM »
rumblings

It's "not about money.  It's about respect."

Do not Stay Calm.

is this a post from one week ago that just got bumped or are most of you guys really just coming around to this and figuring this thing out?

Guise, it's not about whether we are just now figuring it out or if the jackasses in the AD are just now figuring it out.  I'm just telling you all what they told me.  It appears they thought they could buy their way out of the situation and were told otherwise.  Don't shoot the messenger.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1854 on: March 26, 2012, 01:18:18 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.

also, if anyone thinks about attacking k-state prez, you're a clown. schulz is great and his family is awesome (especially the chunky kid with glasses, i think his name is andrew.)

people want schulz to fire currie or something. maybe they could would out some kind of deal where frank just reports to the animal and currie can have all of the other sports. idk. sounds reasonable.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1855 on: March 26, 2012, 01:18:32 PM »
if Frank told Upshaw not to sign than this has obviously been brewing for a long time, him being a bitch I mean.


I think we should vent to Shultz, its his job to keep the AD in line.  That is obviously not happening. 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22768
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1856 on: March 26, 2012, 01:19:21 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.
This is the proper course of action, but I don't know if I have it in me. 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88385
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1857 on: March 26, 2012, 01:19:38 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.

also, if anyone thinks about attacking k-state prez, you're a clown. schulz is great and his family is awesome (especially the chunky kid with glasses, i think his name is andrew.)

this is my stance

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13500
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1858 on: March 26, 2012, 01:20:38 PM »
Did we take it for granted?  :frown:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40463
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1859 on: March 26, 2012, 01:20:46 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.

also, if anyone thinks about attacking k-state prez, you're a clown. schulz is great and his family is awesome (especially the chunky kid with glasses, i think his name is andrew.)

could you be any better of a poster?

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1860 on: March 26, 2012, 01:20:57 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.

also, if anyone thinks about attacking k-state prez, you're a clown. schulz is great and his family is awesome (especially the chunky kid with glasses, i think his name is andrew.)

Yes. Send the angry at Frank, then Currie.

Offline smith1051

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 270
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1861 on: March 26, 2012, 01:21:23 PM »
Did we take it for granted?  :frown:

Yep the Asbury/Wooly days.  Can't wait to get back to them   :bang:

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1862 on: March 26, 2012, 01:21:39 PM »
rumblings

It's "not about money.  It's about respect."

Do not Stay Calm.

is this a post from one week ago that just got bumped or are most of you guys really just coming around to this and figuring this thing out?

Guise, it's not about whether we are just now figuring it out or if the jackasses in the AD are just now figuring it out.  I'm just telling you all what they told me.  It appears they thought they could buy their way out of the situation and were told otherwise.  Don't shoot the messenger.

well i could have told them a week ago that they couldn't and i have never spoken to either frank martin or john currie in my entire life. this can't be a surprise to them. it just can't. i mean it makes sense that it could though given the absolutely mind rough ridin' ineptitude of what has transpired over the past two weeks.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1863 on: March 26, 2012, 01:21:46 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.

also, if anyone thinks about attacking k-state prez, you're a clown. schulz is great and his family is awesome (especially the chunky kid with glasses, i think his name is andrew.)

this is my stance

I'm in.

Offline FP TC etc.

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2301
  • USA! USA! USA!
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1864 on: March 26, 2012, 01:22:14 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.
This is the proper course of action, but I don't know if I have it in me.

Exactly. I want to let loose a thousand anger bombs at Frank, but god damn I don't know if I have it in me.

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1865 on: March 26, 2012, 01:22:38 PM »
could you be any better of a poster?

of course. don't ever get complacent, boy.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13500
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1866 on: March 26, 2012, 01:22:50 PM »
Heres to dollar night at the OOD  :cheers:












 :frown:

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22768
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1867 on: March 26, 2012, 01:23:22 PM »
Frank, then Currie, then if that doesn't work, The Animal.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1868 on: March 26, 2012, 01:23:51 PM »
The good news on top of Upshaw not signing his LOI, is that according to Upshaw's mom Frank told them not to....

Frank is dead to me.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1869 on: March 26, 2012, 01:24:50 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.
This is the proper course of action, but I don't know if I have it in me.

Exactly. I want to let loose a thousand anger bombs at Frank, but god damn I don't know if I have it in me.

imagine him upsetting kentucky and smiling about it.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22431
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1870 on: March 26, 2012, 01:25:23 PM »
 :zzz:

Offline FP TC etc.

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2301
  • USA! USA! USA!
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1871 on: March 26, 2012, 01:25:47 PM »
As soon as it's announced I'm going to react one of 2 ways.

Completely shut down and start following some random Big 10 team

or

Scream/cry/lay in my own feces and tweet super angry things at anyone ever involved with K-State athletics.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88385
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1872 on: March 26, 2012, 01:25:59 PM »
remember when we all mocked the NU coaching hire like 3 days ago?   :frown:

Offline FP TC etc.

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2301
  • USA! USA! USA!
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1873 on: March 26, 2012, 01:26:18 PM »
in my opinion, you have to direct immediate anger at frank and hammer him with loyalty comments, "just like huggins," etc. then, once he's definitely gone (but after frank's presser), you bust out the pitch forks and go after currie with an intensity unknown to mankind.
This is the proper course of action, but I don't know if I have it in me.

Exactly. I want to let loose a thousand anger bombs at Frank, but god damn I don't know if I have it in me.

imagine him upsetting kentucky and smiling about it.

All that does is make me die inside.  :bawl:

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1874 on: March 26, 2012, 01:26:35 PM »
for those who are planning on getting mad at schulz, you can try, but you won't be able to sustain your anger.

seriously, it's impossible. look at this family.