Author Topic: Frank watch 2012:  (Read 361424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TheHamburglar

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5960
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1400 on: March 25, 2012, 02:51:26 PM »
Mark Emmert, president of the NCAA, commented on the JamSam mess during halftime of Baylor-Kentucky. 

Basic message was that the NCAA puts forth 60 million dollars a year for travel expenses/misc. expenses for students, and schools have an opportunity to supply per diem.  The situation should never have occurred because jamar should have had other resources available to him.  He also said he would like to simplify the rule book, expects it to shrink in size considerably.

Sounds like Emmert actually has no idea what the eff actually happened.  Sounds like he heard the Curtis quote about Jamar needing some money for food and decided to use it as a cop-out and completely changed what happened.  "O, he made a comment about Jamar needing money for food, I'll put out a quote making it sound like he meant Jamar needed money for food on the trip to Pitt even though the transaction occurred before Jamar even left for Pitt.  That way, rather than talk about the actual issue I'll make it look like KSU didn't give Jamar money for food on the trip to Pitt."  Nothing but a bullshit quote to make Jamar look greedy.  eff that guy.
I got a guy on the other line about some white walls

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1401 on: March 25, 2012, 02:54:17 PM »
The Animal.

in my personal experience with him, he's been nothing more than a politically-"correct", duplicitous bureaucrat, spewing meaningless responses that evade the questions.  pretty much par for the course.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline OlatheWildcat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 696
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1402 on: March 25, 2012, 02:56:23 PM »
The Animal.

in my personal experience with him, he's been nothing more than a politically-"correct", duplicitous bureaucrat, spewing meaningless responses that evade the questions.  pretty much par for the course.

I give credit to anyone that can make a blazer work.
Follow me on Twitter @OlatheWildcat12

Offline youchooseausername

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1403 on: March 25, 2012, 02:57:05 PM »
Mark Emmert, president of the NCAA, commented on the JamSam mess during halftime of Baylor-Kentucky. 

Basic message was that the NCAA puts forth 60 million dollars a year for travel expenses/misc. expenses for students, and schools have an opportunity to supply per diem.  The situation should never have occurred because jamar should have had other resources available to him.  He also said he would like to simplify the rule book, expects it to shrink in size considerably.

Sounds like Emmert actually has no idea what the eff actually happened.  Sounds like he heard the Curtis quote about Jamar needing some money for food and decided to use it as a cop-out and completely changed what happened.  "O, he made a comment about Jamar needing money for food, I'll put out a quote making it sound like he meant Jamar needed money for food on the trip to Pitt even though the transaction occurred before Jamar even left for Pitt.  That way, rather than talk about the actual issue I'll make it look like KSU didn't give Jamar money for food on the trip to Pitt."  Nothing but a bullshit quote to make Jamar look greedy.  eff that guy.
"The sad thing about the whole thing is it's my fault.  Instead of creating toughness and developing a team, I coached not to lose all year.  It's sad to be honest."

- oscar Weber

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1404 on: March 25, 2012, 03:01:56 PM »
I hope some of frank anger leaves Currie and is redirected at this Mark Emmert guy.   :pray:

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67317
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1405 on: March 25, 2012, 03:02:57 PM »
Quote
I wish I could post a clip of the whole interview with the NCAA president about the Jamar situation. What he basically said was the situation should have never happened, it was an obvious violation with no question about it, and if Currie had ignored it, the NCAA would have thrown the book at us.

But Frank would have tried to hide it and cover it up. No thanks Frank. Give me Currie any day of the week.

Some of you all should be ashamed of yourselves.

Currie did exactly the right thing, which takes courage and integrity, especially when one is being pressured by a slime ball like Frank.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88408
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1406 on: March 25, 2012, 03:04:22 PM »
where is that from seven?

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1407 on: March 25, 2012, 03:07:52 PM »
Quote
I wish I could post a clip of the whole interview with the NCAA president about the Jamar situation. What he basically said was the situation should have never happened, it was an obvious violation with no question about it, and if Currie had ignored it, the NCAA would have thrown the book at us.

But Frank would have tried to hide it and cover it up. No thanks Frank. Give me Currie any day of the week.

Some of you all should be ashamed of yourselves.

Currie did exactly the right thing, which takes courage and integrity, especially when one is being pressured by a slime ball like Frank.

WHO IN THE eff?  Address, please.
:adios:

Offline OlatheWildcat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 696
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1408 on: March 25, 2012, 03:08:40 PM »
Gotta be the Scout board
Follow me on Twitter @OlatheWildcat12

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67317
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1409 on: March 25, 2012, 03:11:01 PM »
yeah, kstatefans.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline p1k3

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2555
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1410 on: March 25, 2012, 03:11:47 PM »
Some of our fans need to be shot.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1411 on: March 25, 2012, 03:13:03 PM »
Some of our fans need to be shot.

this

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55920
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1412 on: March 25, 2012, 03:13:19 PM »
I don't think covering up the Jamar situation would have been a good idea. The third party kind of throws a wrench in things.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88408
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1413 on: March 25, 2012, 03:16:13 PM »
I don't think covering up the Jamar situation would have been a good idea. The third party kind of throws a wrench in things.

yeah

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18047
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1414 on: March 25, 2012, 03:17:37 PM »
I don't think covering up the Jamar situation would have been a good idea. The third party kind of throws a wrench in things.

I think it would've been possible to bullshit it for a day and then say something after 'cuse

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55920
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1415 on: March 25, 2012, 03:18:29 PM »
I don't think covering up the Jamar situation would have been a good idea. The third party kind of throws a wrench in things.

yeah

This might have been another "just ask me" moments like w/ the Miami job. He didn't really want that job, he just wanted them to want him. And Frank probably knows Jamar should have sat, but he wanted Currie to include him in that decision.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88408
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1416 on: March 25, 2012, 03:20:22 PM »
I don't think covering up the Jamar situation would have been a good idea. The third party kind of throws a wrench in things.

yeah

This might have been another "just ask me" moments like w/ the Miami job. He didn't really want that job, he just wanted them to want him. And Frank probably knows Jamar should have sat, but he wanted Currie to include him in that decision.

agreed.  Currie (or anyone) could go a long way with Frank by making him make the decision instead of telling him the decision. 

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1417 on: March 25, 2012, 03:21:01 PM »
I don't think covering up the Jamar situation would have been a good idea. The third party kind of throws a wrench in things.

yeah

This might have been another "just ask me" moments like w/ the Miami job. He didn't really want that job, he just wanted them to want him. And Frank probably knows Jamar should have sat, but he wanted Currie to include him in that decision.

 :thumbs:
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55920
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1418 on: March 25, 2012, 03:24:36 PM »
I don't think covering up the Jamar situation would have been a good idea. The third party kind of throws a wrench in things.

I think it would've been possible to bullshit it for a day and then say something after 'cuse

If Currie, Frank, and Jamar were the only ones that knew about it, you are absolutely right. But I would guess there is some sort of log of when violations are reported from third parties to ensure prompt action is taken by the school. And when the third party is involved, who knows who they told? You think this guy would hesitate to call the NCAA at the same time? On top of that, you have Malone taking ownership of the cash to everyone in the world. But the main thing is the third party makes a situation like this so much harder to manage than just an internal discovery.


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88408
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1419 on: March 25, 2012, 03:24:59 PM »
BallPlayers

Post #2889
garrett, indiana
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
latest Rumor   Reply
has U. Illinois offerring Coach Drew their H.C. job

this time of the year, I get more calls about "jobs" than players...???

 :sdeek:

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29365
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1420 on: March 25, 2012, 03:28:57 PM »
captured the interview with president ncaa douche - i'll put it up on youtube asap

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88408
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1421 on: March 25, 2012, 03:29:15 PM »
BallPlayers

Post #2890
garrett, indiana
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Re: latest Rumor   Reply
claf ... I get this ZOO every March-May ...
... I have a Players Service - NOT - a Coaching Search Service

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55920
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1422 on: March 25, 2012, 03:33:23 PM »
maybe he needs a coaching search service

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1423 on: March 25, 2012, 03:39:18 PM »
Will isn't leaving. Frank isn't leaving.   Enjoy your day fellas.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88408
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank watch 2012:
« Reply #1424 on: March 25, 2012, 03:41:06 PM »
Will isn't leaving. Frank isn't leaving.   Enjoy your day fellas.

i'm enjoying the crap out of my day already.  will take though.