Will the Nike deal be reupped?

[OregonSmock]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

[wes mantooth]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

[Pexikan]

How many adidas shoe lines are out there for bball anyways? Six? Five?  I see ku's players wearing like three varieties. Same with the other "adidas" schools.  Love that Nike teams wear elite Jordan 11's and super hyperspeed carbon fiber flywire foamposite awesomness. Adidas treats sports like Nazis. There. I said it.

[MeatGeek]

Isn't have a lot more revenue than expenses a good thing when your expenses are actually going to improving your athletics facilities and not to paying multiple football coaches?  Sorry I only got like a B- in accounting. I have a guy for that sorta stuff.

[OregonSmock]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

[Stevesie60]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

How is that any different that what you defined as "profit"?

[wes mantooth]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

[OregonSmock]

How many adidas shoe lines are out there for bball anyways? Six? Five?  I see ku's players wearing like three varieties. Same with the other "adidas" schools.  Love that Nike teams wear elite Jordan 11's and super hyperspeed carbon fiber flywire foamposite awesomness. Adidas treats sports like Nazis. There. I said it.

Derrick Rose and Dwight Howard both have their own shoes, plus there are several other adidas shoe lines, including ones that are specifically made for each college.  KU has several of our own:

[OregonSmock]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

[wes mantooth]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

omg 

[OregonSmock]

It is a standard economic assumption (though not necessarily a perfect one in the real world) that, other things being equal, a firm will attempt to maximize its profits. Given that profit is defined as the difference in total revenue and total cost, a firm achieves a maximum by operating at the point where the difference between the two is at its greatest. In markets which do not show interdependence, this point can either be found by looking at these two curves directly, or by finding and selecting the best of the points where the gradients of the two curves (marginal revenue and marginal cost respectively) are equal. In interdependent markets, game theory must be used to derive a profit maximising solution.

[OregonSmock]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

omg 

Oh okay, you're the one who doesn't understand profit.  Noted.

[Stevesie60]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  One school's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  A second school's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  The first one spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  The second one spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  The first one does not profit nearly as much as the second. Got it?

[wes mantooth]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

omg 

Oh okay, you're the one who doesn't understand profit.  Noted.

School A has 50 mill in rev and 25 mill in expense
School B has 70 mill in rev and 65 mill in expense

Q:  Which school is more profitable?

[OregonSmock]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  One school's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  A second school's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  The first one spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  The second one spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  The first one does not profit nearly as much as the second. Got it?

Well, yeah, that's pretty much what I said.  The fact of the matter is that KU didn't profit as much because we spent more money.  KU still generated more revenue and had more money to spend.  Who cares how much you profit if it's just being hoarded.

[OregonSmock]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

omg 

Oh okay, you're the one who doesn't understand profit.  Noted.

School A has 50 mill in rev and 25 mill in expense
School B has 70 mill in rev and 65 mill in expense

Q:  Which school is more profitable?

I've never argued that KU has more profit than K-State.  I would rather have higher revenues and have more money to spend than to hoard a bunch of money and call it profit.  This is athletics...

[wes mantooth]

26.7 million vs. 12.3 million.  Wow.


    

so, i don't understand profit when i say 23 mill vs 0 mill, then you say profit is "basically revenues minus expenses"

you dumbfuck

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  KU's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  K-State's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  KU spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  K-State spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  KU makes more money and spends more money.  Get it yet?

yeah, so you don't understand profit.   

Okay, explain it then.

Let me spell it out for you, dude.  One school's athletic revenue is ~$74 million.  A second school's is ~$68 million (pretty much an all-time high after a great football season).  The first one spent ~$71 million and kept $3 million in profit.  The second one spent $45 million and kept $23 million in profit.  The first one does not profit nearly as much as the second. Got it?

Well, yeah, that's pretty much what I said.  The fact of the matter is that KU didn't profit as much because we spent more money.  KU still generated more revenue and had more money to spend.  Who cares how much you profit if it's just being hoarded.

um, well yeah, uh, that's, um, what i said.   

[FP TC etc.]

Maybe we're saving it all up for something really nice 

[Trim]

Can you guys slow down so I can keep up with my ?

Those rough ridin' shoes. 

[OregonSmock]

Well, uh, yeah, KU generates more money and spends more money than K-State.  The earth is round. 

[j-dub]

hey beems, let me give profit a try.

$2,000,000 earned/received

50 bucks a hooker at somewhere north of 60..we'll say 62. 62*50 = $3,100

beems total profit margin = 1,996,900

no worries beems you're still 

[OregonSmock]

 

[wes mantooth]

Well, uh, yeah, KU generates more money and spends more money than K-State.  The earth is round.

spends it on what?  endzone recliners and zero conference football wins?     not much bang for your buck

[OregonSmock]

Well, uh, yeah, KU generates more money and spends more money than K-State.  The earth is round.

spends it on what?  endzone recliners and zero conference football wins?     not much bang for your buck

National titles, BCS Bowls, Big 12 championships, facility upgrades, NCOY's, McDonald All-Americans, etc. 

[Dugout DickStone]

Those Adidas are so bush league.