Author Topic: Guards  (Read 3964 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Guards
« on: March 17, 2012, 01:35:04 PM »
I thought it would come down to guards and it did. Our weren't bad, Syracuse's were great. Scoop Jardine played like a SR, though I'm proud of how Angel, Rod, and Will played.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2012, 01:36:32 PM »
I thought it would come down to guards and it did. Our weren't bad, Syracuse's were great. Scoop Jardine played like a SR, though I'm proud of how Angel, Rod, and Will played.
exactly.

Especially Will.  I thought we was going to be our biggest liability because of Cuse's size and speed, and he did pretty well.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59704
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2012, 01:37:36 PM »
It would be super sweet if we could find another Rodney and maybe a 4 inch taller version of Angel. 

But Jo and Gip's complete inability to convert the myriad of open shots they had was a killer.


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2012, 01:38:57 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Guards
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2012, 01:40:48 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

Yeah, we gave up some shots, but they made a lot of guarded/hard shots. I really am having a hard time being upset.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2012, 01:41:58 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his foul trouble, but not the guards.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2012, 01:46:42 PM by Pendergast »

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2012, 01:42:10 PM »
Winning with 59 points would have been pretty hard, imo.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline SPE_khat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2012, 01:45:22 PM »
Watching our guards try to guard their clearly superior , longer, more athletic guards: :barf:
We won't be able to compete with the top dogs until we get these types of guards

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Guards
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2012, 01:45:50 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his could trouble, but not the guards.

Of course he struggled; impossible situation for him. He played fine and will be fine.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2012, 01:48:19 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his could trouble, but not the guards.

Of course he struggled; impossible situation for him. He played fine and will be fine.

Come on, I know you're level headed and I'm certainly not.  But he was terrible. If you can't admit that then my respect for you will definitely change for the worse.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Guards
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2012, 01:48:39 PM »
Gip will be fine.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Guards
« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2012, 01:49:39 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his could trouble, but not the guards.

Of course he struggled; impossible situation for him. He played fine and will be fine.

Come on, I know you're level headed and I'm certainly not.  But he was terrible. If you can't admit that then my respect for you will definitely change for the worse.
I certainly hope _FAN doesn't give a crap about if you respect him.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2012, 01:51:30 PM »
I certainly hope _FAN doesn't give a crap about if you respect him.

GMAFB I didn't say he should care, and it was not implied.  But congrats on the predictable response.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Guards
« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2012, 01:53:21 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his could trouble, but not the guards.

Of course he struggled; impossible situation for him. He played fine and will be fine.

Come on, I know you're level headed and I'm certainly not.  But he was terrible. If you can't admit that then my respect for you will definitely change for the worse.
I certainly hope _FAN doesn't give a crap about if you respect him.

I don't.

He's got to hit the shots he missed and catch the ball, but he boarded and defended well. I'm really not that disappointed considering what he was thrown into, and anyone who is that upset is being unreasonable IMHO.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2012, 01:54:18 PM »
I thought it would come down to guards and it did. Our weren't bad, Syracuse's were great. Scoop Jardine played like a SR, though I'm proud of how Angel, Rod, and Will played.

yep, they were awesome    :flush:   

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #15 on: March 17, 2012, 01:55:42 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his could trouble, but not the guards.

Of course he struggled; impossible situation for him. He played fine and will be fine.

Come on, I know you're level headed and I'm certainly not.  But he was terrible. If you can't admit that then my respect for you will definitely change for the worse.
I certainly hope _FAN doesn't give a crap about if you respect him.

I don't.

He's got to hit the shots he missed and catch the ball, but he boarded and defended well. I'm really not that disappointed considering what he was thrown into, and anyone who is that upset is being unreasonable IMHO.

+ mothafuckin' 1

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #16 on: March 17, 2012, 01:56:41 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his could trouble, but not the guards.

Of course he struggled; impossible situation for him. He played fine and will be fine.

Come on, I know you're level headed and I'm certainly not.  But he was terrible. If you can't admit that then my respect for you will definitely change for the worse.
I certainly hope _FAN doesn't give a crap about if you respect him.

I don't.

He's got to hit the shots he missed and catch the ball, but he boarded and defended well. I'm really not that disappointed considering what he was thrown into, and anyone who is that upset is being unreasonable IMHO.

The use of the word upset is very telling.  He did not play well.  Drawing a couple fouls early and the occasional rebound against a poor rebounding team is not a saving grace.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3820
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #17 on: March 17, 2012, 02:07:44 PM »
mostly agree.  people can talk all they want (justifiably) about gipson's problem keying the zone offense, but the more important issue was kstate's inability to contain su's guards defensively.

and i agree it was more them playing great than kstate defending poorly.

How can you disregard the countless quick breaks started by Gip's butter fingers?  That had to account for a significant amount of points.

I didn't see poor defense by the guards at all.  Terrible defense by Gip, and JO after his could trouble, but not the guards.

Of course he struggled; impossible situation for him. He played fine and will be fine.

Come on, I know you're level headed and I'm certainly not.  But he was terrible. If you can't admit that then my respect for you will definitely change for the worse.
I certainly hope _FAN doesn't give a crap about if you respect him.

I don't.

He's got to hit the shots he missed and catch the ball, but he boarded and defended well. I'm really not that disappointed considering what he was thrown into, and anyone who is that upset is being unreasonable IMHO.

The use of the word upset is very telling.  He did not play well.  Drawing a couple fouls early and the occasional rebound against a poor rebounding team is not a saving grace.

Gip is a freshman who is a boards and d guy, if you expected him to play much better in this game you're a rough ridin' idiot. He should have made a couple shots he didn't and caught a couple passes he dropped, but even a perfect game from Gip and we still lose this game.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #18 on: March 17, 2012, 02:12:14 PM »
Gip is a freshman who is a boards and d guy, if you expected him to play much better in this game you're a rough ridin' idiot. He should have made a couple shots he didn't and caught a couple passes he dropped, but even a perfect game from Gip and we still lose this game.

Oh so he's not supposed to score bunnies? Ok, noted.  And it was more than a couple, he missed 5 layups and 1 dunk.  He also dropped 5+ passes that hit his hands.  It has nothing to do with winning, or emotion.  He simply played a terrible game.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3820
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #19 on: March 17, 2012, 02:17:48 PM »
Gip is a freshman who is a boards and d guy, if you expected him to play much better in this game you're a rough ridin' idiot. He should have made a couple shots he didn't and caught a couple passes he dropped, but even a perfect game from Gip and we still lose this game.

Oh so he's not supposed to score bunnies? Ok, noted.  And it was more than a couple, he missed 5 layups and 1 dunk.  He also dropped 5+ passes that hit his hands.  It has nothing to do with winning, or emotion.  He simply played a terrible game.

He played a terrible game offensively, but again, if you expected much more from a freshman who is not good offensively against Syracuse in the NCAA tournament you are a rough ridin' idiot.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #20 on: March 17, 2012, 02:20:46 PM »
Gip struggled in the 2nd half.   His first half was fine.   

first half our guards played about as well as  we can ask.   Tough matchup for us when Waiters and Joseph both of the floor.   

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #21 on: March 17, 2012, 02:22:01 PM »
Gip is a freshman who is a boards and d guy, if you expected him to play much better in this game you're a rough ridin' idiot. He should have made a couple shots he didn't and caught a couple passes he dropped, but even a perfect game from Gip and we still lose this game.

Oh so he's not supposed to score bunnies? Ok, noted.  And it was more than a couple, he missed 5 layups and 1 dunk.  He also dropped 5+ passes that hit his hands.  It has nothing to do with winning, or emotion.  He simply played a terrible game.

He played a terrible game offensively, but again, if you expected much more from a freshman who is not good offensively against Syracuse in the NCAA tournament you are a rough ridin' idiot.

He struggled on offense and was not efficient; I already said that he struggled with both shooting and catching. Still, he finished with 8 and 8 while playing MORE MINUTES than he's played IN ANY GAME all year. And Syracuse is a long, quick team, really a bad match-up at this point in Gips' career.

I'm sorry, I'm not going to throw him under the bus for how he played today, it was going to take an exceptional game today for him and he couldn't do it. I'm sorry I'm not shocked (or upset) by this.

He is going to be a fine player at K-State before he's done.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #22 on: March 17, 2012, 02:22:44 PM »
He played a terrible game offensively, but again, if you expected much more from a freshman who is not good offensively against Syracuse in the NCAA tournament you are a rough ridin' idiot.

Yes, I expect him to make layups.  Where do I self report as a rough ridin' idiot?  Expecting him to play better, is not expecting him to have a world beating game.  There's more to life than black and white.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Guards
« Reply #23 on: March 17, 2012, 02:24:30 PM »
Dirty Cuse raper maliciously breaking Rod's ankle really dampened his output.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Guards
« Reply #24 on: March 17, 2012, 02:24:51 PM »
there were almost zero uncontested lay ups or bunnies out there today