Lickey

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I have noticed that you are missing me.   

- Sugar "ditto head" Dick

P.S.
What to do about the adolescents trashing THE PIT?

P.S.S.
ditto head? Do explain

[star seed 7]

people that listen to rush are "ditto-heads".

they call in and say "mega-ditto's rush!  i just can't believe we have a black in office, why hasn't anyone killed this guy yet?!?"

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I'm always unsurprised to find out the psycho obsessive liberal left knows more about "mainstream" conservatism than I do.

Not only do they choose to live in their own unreality, but they also create an antagonistic unreality to compete with. Quite the frightening psycho disorder.

[star seed 7]

a guy i worked with would listen to him, and i heard it more than a few times.

he was the typical dumb, racist, conservative too.

[star seed 7]

but you would like him, you parrot him a lot.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

but you would like him, you parrot him a lot.

Typical dumb, racist bakaaaaaaw!!!

LOL, what a tard

[mortons toe]

a guy i worked with would listen to him, and i heard it more than a few times.

he was the typical dumb, racist, conservative too.

[star seed 7]

a guy i worked with would listen to him, and i heard it more than a few times.

he was the typical dumb, racist, conservative too.

pretty disgusting as well.

[LickNeckey]

usually Rush says something like this

http://www.wjla.com/articles/2012/03/rush-limbaugh-calls-georgetown-law-student-a-slut-and-a-prostitute--73277.html

and a bunch or morons call in and say "mega dittos" Rush


(i haven't listened to the guy in years, however much of my youth was spent listening to him on the only radio station i could get in the tractor cab.)

[Dave Wooderson]

Cracks me up that this woman, who goes to a school that costs $40,000+, says she is going broke from buying birth control and that it should be subsidized and paid for by someone else and people think that this is logical.  If you had sex three times a day and used $1/condum it would be $900/year (excluding the days she is on the rag).  This woman claims she is spending $3,000/year on birth control.  That would definately put her in the slut category.  And if she wants someone else to pay for her to be able to have sex, that would put her in the prostitute category.  So she is a slut and wants to be a prostitute.  Not sure why she isn't a prostitute, cause she could make a lot more money with all the sex she wants to have.  What the eff happened to personal responsibility and paying for your own entertainment.

[LickNeckey]

See.

just like that

[Rage Against the McKee]

Cracks me up that this woman, who goes to a school that costs $40,000+, says she is going broke from buying birth control and that it should be subsidized and paid for by someone else and people think that this is logical.  If you had sex three times a day and used $1/condum it would be $900/year (excluding the days she is on the rag).  This woman claims she is spending $3,000/year on birth control.  That would definately put her in the slut category.  And if she wants someone else to pay for her to be able to have sex, that would put her in the prostitute category.  So she is a slut and wants to be a prostitute.  Not sure why she isn't a prostitute, cause she could make a lot more money with all the sex she wants to have.  What the eff happened to personal responsibility and paying for your own entertainment.

 

[LickNeckey]

just for you Dave.

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/409941/march-05-2012/rush-limbaugh-apologizes-to-sandra-fluke?xrs=eml_col

[SdK]

Cracks me up that this woman, who goes to a school that costs $40,000+, says she is going broke from buying birth control and that it should be subsidized and paid for by someone else and people think that this is logical.  If you had sex three times a day and used $1/condum it would be $900/year (excluding the days she is on the rag).  This woman claims she is spending $3,000/year on birth control.  That would definately put her in the slut category.  And if she wants someone else to pay for her to be able to have sex, that would put her in the prostitute category.  So she is a slut and wants to be a prostitute.  Not sure why she isn't a prostitute, cause she could make a lot more money with all the sex she wants to have.  What the eff happened to personal responsibility and paying for your own entertainment.

Parody post?

[SdK]

Parroty post!

[Rage Against the McKee]

Guys, I bet the prostitutes who work the streets must spend $20,000 per year on birth control. How will we ever afford to subsidize their lifestyle?

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

Guys, I bet the prostitutes who work the streets must spend $20,000 per year on birth control. How will we ever afford to subsidize their lifestyle?

They probably get theirs from Planned Parenthood for $15 a month.  That Georgetown chick must not be very bright if she's paying $3K a year.

[SdK]

Without insurance, the cost can be around 1k a year.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

Without insurance, the cost can be around 1k a year.

Tell your girlfriend to go to planned parenthood. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/birth-control-pill-4228.htm

[SdK]

Hell a script that I used to get filled once a month cost me 12 dollars with insurance, and now without insurance it's 80.

It pays to have insurance. It's even better to have great insurance.

I may have misunderstood this argument and what is actually being proposed. But isn't the argument about telling insurance companies that they have to cover birth control and not that the government will be paying for birth control? If that is what it is, I don't understand what all the fuss is about. In addition, I'm a huge fan of cutting down the amount of babies that are being popped out in this country. I think that making insurance companies cover bc would be a huge plus. I'm not saying it would cure the idiots from getting knocked up, because they still have to take it right, etc.


Also, bc isn't just about preventing pregnancies. If it were, I wouldn't know so many women that are waiting until marriage or not having sex and haven't for years still taking birth control.

Doesn't the bible say that women go through childbirth as punishment for the original sin? If that is the case, are you telling me that catholic women or religious women always go for natural birth? I don't think so. In fact, I know they don't.

[SdK]

Without insurance, the cost can be around 1k a year.

Tell your girlfriend to go to planned parenthood. http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/birth-control-pill-4228.htm

She came from a wealthy family, so money wasn't the issue and felt that taken advantage of the system when it wasn't necessary wasn't the right thing to do. Also, this was four years ago, and the bc that would work for her was one of the more expensive ones.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

Hell a script that I used to get filled once a month cost me 12 dollars with insurance, and now without insurance it's 80.

It pays to have insurance. It's even better to have great insurance.

I may have misunderstood this argument and what is actually being proposed. But isn't the argument about telling insurance companies that they have to cover birth control and not that the government will be paying for birth control? If that is what it is, I don't understand what all the fuss is about. In addition, I'm a huge fan of cutting down the amount of babies that are being popped out in this country. I think that making insurance companies cover bc would be a huge plus. I'm not saying it would cure the idiots from getting knocked up, because they still have to take it right, etc.


Also, bc isn't just about preventing pregnancies. If it were, I wouldn't know so many women that are waiting until marriage or not having sex and haven't for years still taking birth control.

Doesn't the bible say that women go through childbirth as punishment for the original sin? If that is the case, are you telling me that catholic women or religious women always go for natural birth? I don't think so. In fact, I know they don't.

So if the government forces insurance companies to offer birth control for free or a small co-pay, they won't raise rates?  They're really nice. 

[SdK]

I'm sure they would. The cost for covering bc is a lot loss then covering the costs associated with a pregnancy though.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

I'm sure they would. The cost for covering bc is a lot loss then covering the costs associated with a pregnancy though.

You are assuming that if we don't pay for a woman's pills they are going to have a baby. I don't think I would risk having a baby to save even $50 a month, let alone $15.

[SdK]

I'm sure they would. The cost for covering bc is a lot loss then covering the costs associated with a pregnancy though.

You are assuming that if we don't pay for a woman's pills they are going to have a baby. I don't think I would risk having a baby to save even $50 a month, let alone $15.

No, I'm saying pregnancies and all that goes with that are covered already. Adding something that could lessen the occurrence of that huge bill doesn't seem deserving of a price hike.

Insurance companies now have to cover smoking cessation options. I see bc in the same light as this. Actually I think smoking cessation having less cause for coverage than bc.