0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Look at the too cool for school crowd trying to downplay everything.Are we getting Kruger'd . . . middling conference team, a couple of decent wins, perplexing losses, mediocre talent, first round NCAA tourney exits.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on February 25, 2012, 08:02:47 PMLook at the too cool for school crowd trying to downplay everything.Are we getting Kruger'd . . . middling conference team, a couple of decent wins, perplexing losses, mediocre talent, first round NCAA tourney exits.jesus christ, dax. this is nothing like kruger. we return everyone but jamar. Recruiting has been improving. We'll be much better next year.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on February 25, 2012, 08:02:47 PMmiddling conference team, a couple of decent wins....dax, you say "decent wins". Is there a higher level from "decent" or is that the top? as a followup, what would have been a win on the higher level if it exists?
middling conference team, a couple of decent wins....
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on February 25, 2012, 08:02:47 PMLook at the too cool for school crowd trying to downplay everything.Are we getting Kruger'd . . . middling conference team, a couple of decent wins, perplexing losses, mediocre talent, first round NCAA tourney exits.Have not seen many of these yet.Don't think we will either I think recruting and play, in general, is moving in the right direction.
Quote from: michigancat on February 25, 2012, 08:09:39 PMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on February 25, 2012, 08:02:47 PMLook at the too cool for school crowd trying to downplay everything.Are we getting Kruger'd . . . middling conference team, a couple of decent wins, perplexing losses, mediocre talent, first round NCAA tourney exits.jesus christ, dax. this is nothing like kruger. we return everyone but jamar. Recruiting has been improving. We'll be much better next year. Did we recruit a guard that can shoot and dribble I don't know about?
Quote from: JKEYS on February 25, 2012, 08:10:59 PMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on February 25, 2012, 08:02:47 PMLook at the too cool for school crowd trying to downplay everything.Are we getting Kruger'd . . . middling conference team, a couple of decent wins, perplexing losses, mediocre talent, first round NCAA tourney exits.Have not seen many of these yet.Don't think we will either I think recruting and play, in general, is moving in the right direction.but what about that turnover @ mu!??? you're giving that guy a free pass.
I don't consider beating Baylor anything beyond a decent win. Sorry Too Cool for Schoolers.
I don't consider the Grand Canyon anything beyond a decent hole in the groundSorry Too Cool for schoolers.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on February 25, 2012, 08:20:43 PMI don't consider beating Baylor anything beyond a decent win. Sorry Too Cool for Schoolers.ok.....road win at the #9 team not anything beyond decent. fine. any comment on the road win at the #3 team? EDIT: you rough ridin' idiot?
ThanksRustyTuckI will acknowledge that Manhattan (nyc) is OK for an island . . . look at the Too Cool for Schoolers gettin all mad.
we have 3 really good wins: mu, @mu, @buwe have 2 really bad losses: ou, @ouwe should have won: WVU, BU, @ ISU, ISU.I'd trade the 6 losses for the 3 wins.
Quote from: catzacker on February 25, 2012, 08:33:17 PMwe have 3 really good wins: mu, @mu, @buwe have 2 really bad losses: ou, @ouwe should have won: WVU, BU, @ ISU, ISU.I'd trade the 6 losses for the 3 wins. no you wouldn't. we get the six wins and then you would complain about the lack of a marquee win and how that is going to cost us in the long run
Quote from: Chingon on February 25, 2012, 08:35:35 PMQuote from: catzacker on February 25, 2012, 08:33:17 PMwe have 3 really good wins: mu, @mu, @buwe have 2 really bad losses: ou, @ouwe should have won: WVU, BU, @ ISU, ISU.I'd trade the 6 losses for the 3 wins. no you wouldn't. we get the six wins and then you would complain about the lack of a marquee win and how that is going to cost us in the long runyou can't triple stamp a double stamp.
Quote from: catzacker on February 25, 2012, 08:33:17 PMwe have 3 really good wins: mu, @mu, @buwe have 2 really bad losses: ou, @ouwe should have won: WVU, BU, @ ISU, ISU.I'd trade the 6 losses for the 3 wins. I feel confident you don't mean that
Quote from: steve dave on February 25, 2012, 08:39:19 PMQuote from: catzacker on February 25, 2012, 08:33:17 PMwe have 3 really good wins: mu, @mu, @buwe have 2 really bad losses: ou, @ouwe should have won: WVU, BU, @ ISU, ISU.I'd trade the 6 losses for the 3 wins. I feel confident you don't mean thatyeah, the two mu games would be hard to give up. maybe see if I could swindle my way into giving up the @ BU game and getting back the two OU losses.
Quote from: catzacker on February 25, 2012, 08:43:14 PMQuote from: steve dave on February 25, 2012, 08:39:19 PMQuote from: catzacker on February 25, 2012, 08:33:17 PMwe have 3 really good wins: mu, @mu, @buwe have 2 really bad losses: ou, @ouwe should have won: WVU, BU, @ ISU, ISU.I'd trade the 6 losses for the 3 wins. I feel confident you don't mean thatyeah, the two mu games would be hard to give up. maybe see if I could swindle my way into giving up the @ BU game and getting back the two OU losses.That's not allowed, buster.
