The Paradoxes of the Idiotic Paradigm

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

[SdK]

Liberals 139
Conservatives 68
All 6

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Wut?

[Dugout DickStone]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

You do know a lot of those rich and successful people take more tax payer money than any welfare recipient ever did?

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

 

[star seed 7]

I liked the part where you tried to make it look like you weren't a parrot of rush limbaugh.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I liked the part where you tried to make it look like you weren't a parrot of rush limbaugh.

I miss katkid

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

You do know a lot of those rich and successful people take more tax payer money than any welfare recipient ever did?

Is this where we get to the argument that "that guy's business wouldn't exist without public roads," or are we talking about farm subsidies again? It's tough to keep up with the lib's humorous efforts to paint the rich as a drag on the welfare system.

[steve dave]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

You do know a lot of those rich and successful people take more tax payer money than any welfare recipient ever did?

Is this where we get to the argument that "that guy's business wouldn't exist without public roads," or are we talking about farm subsidies again? It's tough to keep up with the lib's humorous efforts to paint the rich as a drag on the welfare system.

I know for a fact that this was not what lsoc was getting at....

[8manpick]

Liberals 139
Conservatives 68
All 6

Did you c&p that into word or count each word yourself?

[Dugout DickStone]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

You do know a lot of those rich and successful people take more tax payer money than any welfare recipient ever did?

Is this where we get to the argument that "that guy's business wouldn't exist without public roads," or are we talking about farm subsidies again? It's tough to keep up with the lib's humorous efforts to paint the rich as a drag on the welfare system.

I know for a fact that this was not what lsoc was getting at....

Correct.  I am a conservative.  I am against rough ridin' crooks/thieves who masquerade as businessmen.  I am completely for legit business being left alone by gov.  In fact I push for it every day. 

[Rage Against the McKee]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

You do know a lot of those rich and successful people take more tax payer money than any welfare recipient ever did?

Is this where we get to the argument that "that guy's business wouldn't exist without public roads," or are we talking about farm subsidies again? It's tough to keep up with the lib's humorous efforts to paint the rich as a drag on the welfare system.

I know for a fact that this was not what lsoc was getting at....

Correct.  I am a conservative.  I am against rough ridin' crooks/thieves who masquerade as businessmen.  I am completely for legit business being left alone by gov.  In fact I push for it every day. 

My views are like Ron Paul's only much less extreme. I'm for a smaller military and no entitlements, but I also believe that the Fed has a place in this country and that government absolutely should be funding research and large scale infrastructure projects.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

You do know a lot of those rich and successful people take more tax payer money than any welfare recipient ever did?

Is this where we get to the argument that "that guy's business wouldn't exist without public roads," or are we talking about farm subsidies again? It's tough to keep up with the lib's humorous efforts to paint the rich as a drag on the welfare system.

I know for a fact that this was not what lsoc was getting at....

Correct.  I am a conservative.  I am against rough ridin' crooks/thieves who masquerade as businessmen.  I am completely for legit business being left alone by gov.  In fact I push for it every day.

I agree. Hate "crony capitalism."

[p1k3]

Liberals:

The problem is clearly that certain people are successful and make a lot of money and we need to figure out why those people were able to be successful and make money and do everything in our power to inhibit that going forward, because we prefer that everyone rely on the dole of the federal government so we can expand our power at all cost, even if that cost ultimately needs to bankrupting the country in which case the poor and elderly will suffer greatly, but we don't care because right now there are more people living off the government than those contributing to it, so lets make up lies and rhetoric and convince those lazy stupid people who can't care for themselves that we can make the successful and rich by taxing those that are successful and rich.


Conservatives:

The problem isn't that we enable so many stupid lazy people, although that's certainly the root of the problem, it's that the US Government is fiscally and mathematically incapable of generating enough tax revenue to support the welfare state we've allowed to be created, therefore we need to create a bunch of anti-abortion and anti-immigration laws and try and win elections with our hands tied behind our backs.


Brain dead idiots, all of them.

You do know a lot of those rich and successful people take more tax payer money than any welfare recipient ever did?

Is this where we get to the argument that "that guy's business wouldn't exist without public roads," or are we talking about farm subsidies again? It's tough to keep up with the lib's humorous efforts to paint the rich as a drag on the welfare system.

I know for a fact that this was not what lsoc was getting at....

Correct.  I am a conservative.  I am against rough ridin' crooks/thieves who masquerade as businessmen.  I am completely for legit business being left alone by gov.  In fact I push for it every day.

I agree. Hate "crony capitalism."

but you're going to vote for Romney?

[CNS]

Great example of what I think LSOC is getting at:

My biz just switched phone/internet bundle from a small local guy to Century Link for a savings of $130/month.

Informed local guy we were switching. he told us he understood and that he couldn't compete because Century Link was able to offer such a deal due to govt subsidies which he didn't get.

Our first Century Link bill was like 16pages long and in looking through it, the bill showed a huge amt of credits. Upon calling Century Link, they let me know that the bill length was a mistake and that most of the credits shouldn't have been shown.  I asked for some more detail and was told that the program we signed up for has been subsidized and that Century Link was pushing the product as cheap as they could to gain customers in our area(push little guy out). The credits totaled more than $600 for the month.  My package deal is costing me a little over $300, where it would cost me well over $900/month if unsubsidized. 

No reason for the subsidy, as there was already other providers supplying coverage, yet the company was able to get a subsidy from the govt that is allowing them to reduce the competition in providing a service that was already there.  Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) use of tax rev.