Author Topic: Bracketology  (Read 5362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ksu101

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Bracketology
« on: March 08, 2010, 12:32:10 PM »


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20636
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2010, 12:34:32 PM »
sure if we win 2.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2010, 12:35:25 PM »
sure if we win 2.

I think winning 1 would do it

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20636
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2010, 12:36:31 PM »
might need some help if we only win 1.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2010, 12:38:17 PM »
I dunno why, but i dont like that bracket.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2010, 12:38:44 PM »
ETP's Seeding Predictor Measurement (SPM):

0 Wins - 3 seed
1 Win - 2 seed
2 Wins - 2 seed
3 Wins - 1 seed

:users:
« Last Edit: March 08, 2010, 01:39:00 PM by EllToPay »

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2010, 12:39:56 PM »
ETP's Seeding Predictor Measurement (SPM):

O Wins - 3 seed
1 Win - 2 seed
2 Wins - 2 seed
3 Wins - 1 seed

:users:

Nailed it.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2010, 12:40:22 PM »

Offline theswo

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 482
  • Keep shooting, Gilbert
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2010, 12:41:48 PM »
I dunno why, but i dont like that bracket.
This.  Can't tell how good New Mexico is, I've only seen them play twice.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2010, 12:42:04 PM »
 :driving:

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2010, 01:11:23 PM »
Take that bracket and RUN

Offline CatsFan_58

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 667
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2010, 01:13:08 PM »

Offline theswo

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 482
  • Keep shooting, Gilbert
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2010, 01:19:40 PM »
Take that bracket and RUN
Seems like this has been said for quite a few weeks in a row.

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12302
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2010, 01:21:04 PM »
made a wager with my friend after the iowa state loss

If we are a 2 seed I owe him 20

If we are a 4 seed he owes me 20

Any other seed and nobody owes anyone anything

I've had to many KITN experiences to believe we dont get shafted

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2010, 01:22:10 PM »
so we're a loss and a baylor run away from not being in OKC, correct?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2010, 01:37:13 PM »
so we're a loss and a baylor run away from not being in OKC, correct?

yep

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2010, 01:48:03 PM »
Take that bracket and RUN

kenpom 162, then 16/34, then 40/20/49/105.


cal would be a tough 2nd round game @ a 7 seed.  but other than that, it's a pudding soft bracket.  and at oklahoma city.  there's no way kstate gets an easier bracket than that.

"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2010, 01:59:59 PM »
so we're a loss and a baylor run away from not being in OKC, correct?

yep

i think at this point, it's inevitable.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2010, 02:00:33 PM »
so we're a loss and a baylor run away from not being in OKC, correct?

yep

i think at this point, it's inevitable.

I know you do, and I love you for it. 

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2010, 03:03:22 PM »
so we're a loss and a baylor run away from not being in OKC, correct?

yep

The team to focus on for stealing our spot in OKC has to be New Mexico, they will have either Wyoming or Air Force in their first game of the MWC tournament.  They have wone one close game and one blowout over each team.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2010, 03:03:56 PM »
so we're a loss and a baylor run away from not being in OKC, correct?

yep

i think at this point, it's inevitable.

I know you do, and I love you for it. 

this one cut me deep.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #21 on: March 08, 2010, 03:10:35 PM »
The team to focus on for stealing our spot in OKC has to be New Mexico, they will have either Wyoming or Air Force in their first game of the MWC tournament.  They have wone one close game and one blowout over each team.

ideally they put both kstate and unm in okc.  doesn't matter much who is 2 and who is 3.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55963
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #22 on: March 08, 2010, 03:19:21 PM »
let's go Milwaukee!

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #23 on: March 08, 2010, 03:20:52 PM »
If UNM and KSU are both in same bracket, it will most likely be the west meaning a possible sweet 16 game in SLC, who would the Mormon pull for their conference rival or will they hate on Alford for calling one of their own an a-hole?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology
« Reply #24 on: March 08, 2010, 03:21:52 PM »
let's go Milwaukee!

That's the only other one I would attend.  Have rooms booked at the Hampton near the arena.