I stand corrected. I change my argument to the 2008 time period. Second presidential run, 10 or so terms in congress, same other stuff.
The newsletters were discussed during some of his congressional races, too. I don't feel like googling for you any more, though, because you aren't very nice.
If that newsletter pictured is the best example of "how racist" those newsletters were, and what a "racist" Ron Paul is, then it's probably not much of a story. Pretty sad that it keeps getting recycled by the media.
Ron Paul has plenty of flaws, being a racist isn't one of them. If anecdotal evidence of this type is how you pick and choose presidents to vote for, I suggest you do us all a favor and shoot yourself in the face.