0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WOW, AND IT ONLY TOOK LIKE 100 GAMES FOR KOUGS TO BE RIGHT
Quote from: michigancat on January 26, 2012, 10:56:13 AMWOW, AND IT ONLY TOOK LIKE 100 GAMES FOR KOUGS TO BE RIGHTNo it didn't, dumbass. He's been solid all year.
Quote from: kougar24 on January 25, 2012, 10:41:32 PMI do miss those unis
I sometimes tuck into my underwear. That's normal, right?
I love Marty, but he is only slightly better than Vic at his position.
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on January 26, 2012, 12:51:18 PMI love Marty, but he is only slightly better than Vic at his position.
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on January 26, 2012, 12:51:18 PMI love Marty, but he is only slightly better than Vic at his position.Really?
Quote from: ksu_FAN on January 26, 2012, 12:53:59 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on January 26, 2012, 12:51:18 PMI love Marty, but he is only slightly better than Vic at his position.Really?Using the eye test here of course, maybe there are some statistics that would change my mind.
Tay has bad handles, probably the worst thing he does, you should get your eyes checked.
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on January 26, 2012, 01:23:30 PMTay has bad handles, probably the worst thing he does, you should get your eyes checked. Not on the drive when he stops and pops from 10-15 ft. Maybe when bringing the ball up the court. Tay is great at creating his own shot inside the land of the trees.
Quote from: fanningksu on January 26, 2012, 01:26:59 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on January 26, 2012, 01:23:30 PMTay has bad handles, probably the worst thing he does, you should get your eyes checked. Not on the drive when he stops and pops from 10-15 ft. Maybe when bringing the ball up the court. Tay is great at creating his own shot inside the land of the trees.yes, this is how I see it.
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on January 26, 2012, 01:15:44 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on January 26, 2012, 12:53:59 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on January 26, 2012, 12:51:18 PMI love Marty, but he is only slightly better than Vic at his position.Really?Using the eye test here of course, maybe there are some statistics that would change my mind.They play vastly different positions, so its difficult. But just looking at things like Off Rating or eFG% is somewhat valid. Granted Vic is a better rebounder, but he should be, otherwise its hard to say in any way that Tay is "slightly better than Vic at his position".http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=victor-ojeleye&p1=martavious-irving
Quote from: kougar24 on January 26, 2012, 11:59:26 AMQuote from: michigancat on January 26, 2012, 10:56:13 AMWOW, AND IT ONLY TOOK LIKE 100 GAMES FOR KOUGS TO BE RIGHTNo it didn't, dumbass. He's been solid all year.If by solid you mean consistently slightly below average for a big 12 guard than you are right. Great game for him last night, though.
Quote from: michigancat on January 26, 2012, 12:01:10 PMQuote from: kougar24 on January 26, 2012, 11:59:26 AMQuote from: michigancat on January 26, 2012, 10:56:13 AMWOW, AND IT ONLY TOOK LIKE 100 GAMES FOR KOUGS TO BE RIGHTNo it didn't, dumbass. He's been solid all year.If by solid you mean consistently slightly below average for a big 12 guard than you are right. Great game for him last night, though.first class defensively.
He isn't. Announcers just say that because of his physique.
Quote from: michigancat on January 26, 2012, 02:02:18 PMHe isn't. Announcers just say that because of his physique.Who would you say is our best perimeter defender?