Author Topic: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 3-5-12 (regular season adv stats) (Read 18859 times)

felix rex · « **Reply #50 on:** February 07, 2012, 12:27:50 PM »

Quote from: kougar24 on February 06, 2012, 05:15:46 PM

Quote from: felix rex on February 06, 2012, 11:25:44 AM
We need more signs at games referencing adv stats.

YOU DOWN WIT'
(.88) PPP?

Yes.

eFG% Wins Championships!

kougar24 · « **Reply #51 on:** February 07, 2012, 12:34:22 PM »

THE FOUR FACTORS
OF THE APOCALYPSE

kso_FAN · « **Reply #52 on:** February 07, 2012, 11:02:14 PM »

Good chance we'll move up to #1 in a Big 12 defensive efficiency after KU plays @BU tomorrow....

michigancat · « **Reply #53 on:** February 07, 2012, 11:03:11 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 07, 2012, 11:02:14 PM

Good chance we'll move up to #1 in a Big 12 defensive efficiency after KU plays @BU tomorrow....

Really? Incredible coaching by Frank.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #54 on:** February 07, 2012, 11:05:03 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 07, 2012, 11:03:11 PM

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 07, 2012, 11:02:14 PM
Good chance we'll move up to #1 in a Big 12 defensive efficiency after KU plays @BU tomorrow....

Really? Incredible coaching by Frank.

We are at .95, KU is .94. I'm sure Baylor will have a solid PPP game at home.

michigancat · « **Reply #55 on:** February 07, 2012, 11:14:30 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 07, 2012, 11:05:03 PM

Quote from: michigancat on February 07, 2012, 11:03:11 PM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 07, 2012, 11:02:14 PM
Good chance we'll move up to #1 in a Big 12 defensive efficiency after KU plays @BU tomorrow....

Really? Incredible coaching by Frank.

We are at .95, KU is .94. I'm sure Baylor will have a solid PPP game at home.

That's crazy. Has anyone been close to KU in conference defensive efficiency? I'm going to assume no and celebrate

kso_FAN · « **Reply #56 on:** February 13, 2012, 09:38:22 AM »

The key number for the season IMO is shooting the ball and 2nd would be TOs. If we can hit shots in both halves and maintain a decent TO% we have a shot against anyone. It is interesting to compare this year's team to the 09 team; this year's team is much, much better defensively, but worse offensively.

kougar24 · « **Reply #57 on:** February 13, 2012, 09:51:34 AM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 13, 2012, 09:38:22 AM

The key number for the season IMO is shooting the ball and 2nd would be TOs. If we can hit shots in both halves and maintain a decent TO% we have a shot against anyone. It is interesting to compare this year's team to the 09 team; this year's team is much, much better defensively, but worse offensively.

Is it possible our opponents are collectively much, much worse offensively than they were in '09?

MakeItRain · « **Reply #58 on:** February 13, 2012, 09:55:58 AM »

That FTr,

Also Ken was on the Border Patrol about 30 minutes ago. Aside from his usual self stroking he seemed pretty bullish on the Cats. Of course he also defended California, so there's that.

Cire · « **Reply #59 on:** February 13, 2012, 10:02:41 AM »

Our defense is good because we hack the crap out of people every time they have the ball.

michigancat · « **Reply #60 on:** February 13, 2012, 10:05:46 AM »

Quote from: kougar24 on February 13, 2012, 09:51:34 AM

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 13, 2012, 09:38:22 AM

The key number for the season IMO is shooting the ball and 2nd would be TOs. If we can hit shots in both halves and maintain a decent TO% we have a shot against anyone. It is interesting to compare this year's team to the 09 team; this year's team is much, much better defensively, but worse offensively.

Is it possible our opponents are collectively much, much worse offensively than they were in '09?

We're much better in the Adjusted DEff rankings. (which is adjusted for strength of schedule). 42nd in 09, 16th this year.

kougar24 · « **Reply #61 on:** February 13, 2012, 10:10:55 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 13, 2012, 10:05:46 AM

Quote from: kougar24 on February 13, 2012, 09:51:34 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 13, 2012, 09:38:22 AM

The key number for the season IMO is shooting the ball and 2nd would be TOs. If we can hit shots in both halves and maintain a decent TO% we have a shot against anyone. It is interesting to compare this year's team to the 09 team; this year's team is much, much better defensively, but worse offensively.

Is it possible our opponents are collectively much, much worse offensively than they were in '09?

We're much better in the Adjusted DEff rankings. (which is adjusted for strength of schedule). 42nd in 09, 16th this year.

Adjusted for SOS overall, or for opponents' Off. Eff.? (Just curious.)

michigancat · « **Reply #62 on:** February 13, 2012, 10:20:07 AM »

opponents' offensive efficiency.

http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/help_with_team_page/

kso_FAN · « **Reply #63 on:** February 13, 2012, 11:10:56 AM »

The Big 12 is better this year, according to kenpom. 2nd best league this year, 4th in 09.

kougar24 · « **Reply #64 on:** February 13, 2012, 11:16:07 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 13, 2012, 10:20:07 AM

opponents' offensive efficiency.

http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/help_with_team_page/

Ah. Well then, I must have a grossly overstated memory of our defense in '09.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #65 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:34:59 AM »

Fortunate to be in position for 5th with an offensive efficiency of less than 1.0 PPP at this point in the season. Defense has been really good.

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #66 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:43:50 AM »

Our FTR makes me

SleepFighter · « **Reply #67 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:44:13 AM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 19, 2012, 11:34:59 AM

Fortunate to be in position for 5th with an offensive efficiency of less than 1.0 PPP at this point in the season. Defense has been really good.

Way to glass half full it. My take was that it sucks we're in 5th right now with a defensive efficiency of .96.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #68 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:46:02 AM »

eFG% chart looks inverted

kso_FAN · « **Reply #69 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:51:35 AM »

Quote from: CartierFor3 on February 19, 2012, 11:46:02 AM

eFG% chart looks inverted

It is, looks like I reversed the sort.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #70 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:52:41 AM »

Quote from: SleepFighter on February 19, 2012, 11:44:13 AM

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 19, 2012, 11:34:59 AM

Fortunate to be in position for 5th with an offensive efficiency of less than 1.0 PPP at this point in the season. Defense has been really good.

Way to glass half full it. My take was that it sucks we're in 5th right now with a defensive efficiency of .96.

We're fifth in the difference between our off ppp and def ppp. Def eff of .96 is 2nd in the league though behind KU.

Cire · « **Reply #71 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:57:57 AM »

you can ride elite defense quite a ways #wisconsin

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #72 on:** February 19, 2012, 11:59:21 AM »

Quote from: Cire on February 19, 2012, 11:57:57 AM

you can ride elite defense quite a ways #wisconsin

yeah, but they always have 5 shooters on the floor and don't miss free throws.

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #73 on:** February 19, 2012, 06:53:26 PM »

In conference games only=
we are 10th in the nation in Def TO% ......................and 13th in the nation in TOs forced per game (16.7).
We are #1 in both categories among all BCS teams

Also 10th in the nation in OR per game.

Cire · « **Reply #74 on:** February 19, 2012, 09:11:21 PM »

if sprads and gruds 3's start falling @ 40% look out!