Author Topic: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 3-5-12 (regular season adv stats)  (Read 18894 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Limited sample size of only 6 games, but here are the overall conference only efficiency numbers and 4 factors. Sorted by the difference offensively and defensively of each factor for each team.



(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
« Last Edit: March 05, 2012, 07:38:12 AM by ksu_FAN »

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2012, 04:47:49 PM »
Farmageddon  :ohno:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2012, 04:49:55 PM »
Farmageddon  :ohno:

their numbers are surprising, but they've also played the 2nd easiest conference schedule so far.  kstate has played the hardest.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2012, 05:08:08 PM »
Farmageddon  :ohno:

their numbers are surprising, but they've also played the 2nd easiest conference schedule so far.  kstate has played the hardest.

They are an interesting team. They don't offensive rebound, they don't foul, and they don't force TOs. 44% of their shots are 3s and they hit nearly 39% from 3, but they are shooting (suprisingly) bad from the FT line (especially in league games. Their 3PT defense and defensive rebounding have been really good.

Honestly, I have no idea what to expect when we play them. I really don't expect to beat them in Ames.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2012, 05:55:44 PM »
They are an interesting team. They don't offensive rebound, they don't foul, and they don't force TOs. 44% of their shots are 3s and they hit nearly 39% from 3, but they are shooting (suprisingly) bad from the FT line (especially in league games. Their 3PT defense and defensive rebounding have been really good.

their best shooters get fouled pretty close to never.  their dboarding numbers are very impressive, as is their refusal to foul on defense.  a nice strength on strength challenge for kstate.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline raquetcat

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
  • ^ I let us down
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2012, 07:36:40 PM »
They are an interesting team. They don't offensive rebound, they don't foul, and they don't force TOs. 44% of their shots are 3s and they hit nearly 39% from 3, but they are shooting (suprisingly) bad from the FT line (especially in league games. Their 3PT defense and defensive rebounding have been really good.

their best shooters get fouled pretty close to never.  their dboarding numbers are very impressive, as is their refusal to foul on defense.  a nice strength on strength challenge for kstate.

I could see it coming down to how the game is called, so we'll lose in ames and win in the 'gon
I'm purple down

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2012, 08:27:53 PM »


They are an interesting team. They don't offensive rebound, they don't foul, and they don't force TOs. 44% of their shots are 3s and they hit nearly 39% from 3, but they are shooting (suprisingly) bad from the FT line (especially in league games. Their 3PT defense and defensive rebounding have been really good.

Honestly, I have no idea what to expect when we play them. I really don't expect to beat them in Ames.

Three of the basic tenets of SLTHood, thought the Mayor would be a little more out of the box

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17079
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2012, 08:38:12 PM »
Impressed with the DR% for KSU.  Impressed with MU's as well. 

Drating hurts my feelings.  Orating will come.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2012, 08:42:30 PM »
There may be 80 free throws shot in Lubbock.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17079
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2012, 08:44:57 PM »
There may be 80 free throws shot in Lubbock.

Shades of at CU 09-10 except Tech is much crappier.  Game will last 3.5 hours.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2012, 08:54:21 PM »
Our OR% cracks me up.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2012, 09:40:42 PM »
Given our OR% and FTR%, we are doing rather well on being JYCs. Just need to get that D rating up.
:adios:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2012, 10:03:07 PM »
They are an interesting team. They don't offensive rebound, they don't foul, and they don't force TOs.

Quote
scjhawk wrote: The scary thing about ISU is that they foul the crap out of you and dare the officials to call it.

kufan post.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2012, 10:05:44 PM »
Quote
scjhawk wrote: The scary thing about ISU is that they foul the crap out of you and dare the officials to call it.

kufan post.

Quote
Really?  That's your perception of ISU?  Not saying you're wrong by any means but that surprises me...simply because I don't see it.

iowan post.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2012, 01:34:44 AM by sys »
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17079
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2012, 12:43:17 AM »
scjhawk wrote: The scary thing about ISU is that they foul the crap out of you and dare the officials to call it.

kufan post.

Quote
Really?  That's your perception of ISU?  Not saying you're wrong by any means but that surprises me...simply because I don't see it.

iowan post.
[/quote]

haha, trolling with that
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2012, 11:56:09 AM »
Our OR% cracks me up.

Doug Armstrong and the other guy honestly discussed if our shooters miss on purpose so we can get an ORB during the OSU game on Sat.  A great moment in 66 broadcasting history.

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2012, 03:00:07 PM »
Limited sample size of only 6 games, but here are the overall conference only efficiency numbers and 4 factors. Sorted by the difference offensively and defensively of each factor for each team.


made me realize the variety of colors the schools of the Big 12 have.  :)
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-23-12
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2012, 03:48:23 PM »
Limited sample size of only 6 games, but here are the overall conference only efficiency numbers and 4 factors. Sorted by the difference offensively and defensively of each factor for each team.


made me realize the variety of colors the schools of the Big 12 have.  :)

4 Reds, 2 Oranges (which are close to red on the spectrum), and 4 that are different.  

Not a variety.  Just sayin'.


« Last Edit: January 25, 2012, 03:51:33 PM by Dub »

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-30-12
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2012, 09:05:07 AM »

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38101
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-30-12
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2012, 09:08:00 AM »
slightly above avg  :gocho:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-30-12
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2012, 09:09:33 AM »
slightly above avg  :gocho:

Until we start shooting the ball, we will struggle. TOs hurt, but in general we cause a lot too. Pretty standard Frank basketbrawl. Killing it in OR%, but that's not enough to win if you don't hit some shots.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53934
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-30-12
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2012, 09:21:56 AM »
slightly above avg  :gocho:

Until we start shooting the ball, we will struggle. TOs hurt, but in general we cause a lot too. Pretty standard Frank basketbrawl. Killing it in OR%, but that's not enough to win if you don't hit some shots.

Which is why sprads sucking is so bad.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38101
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-30-12
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2012, 09:34:06 AM »
slightly above avg  :gocho:

Until we start shooting the ball, we will struggle. TOs hurt, but in general we cause a lot too. Pretty standard Frank basketbrawl. Killing it in OR%, but that's not enough to win if you don't hit some shots.

Which is why sprads sucking is so bad.

Yeah.  we need two new guards quick.  WTF is up with Shane getting so much bench?

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-30-12
« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2012, 09:43:56 AM »
slightly above avg  :gocho:

Until we start shooting the ball, we will struggle. TOs hurt, but in general we cause a lot too. Pretty standard Frank basketbrawl. Killing it in OR%, but that's not enough to win if you don't hit some shots.

Which is why sprads sucking is so bad.

Yeah.  we need two new guards quick.  WTF is up with Shane getting so much bench?

The rules of Frankhouse are
1. You do not talk about Frankhouse.
2. You DO NOT talk about Frankhouse.
3. If someone says 'stop', goes limp, or taps out, the Franking is over.
4. Only Frank knows the extent of each Franking.
5. Frank will decide when each Franking is over.
6. The Frankings are bare knuckle. No shirt, no shoes, no weapons.
7. Frankings will go on as long as they have to.
8. If this is your first time at Frankhouse, you have to be Franked.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38101
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: Big 12 Effeciency and Four Factors 1-30-12
« Reply #24 on: January 30, 2012, 10:11:27 AM »
slightly above avg  :gocho:

Until we start shooting the ball, we will struggle. TOs hurt, but in general we cause a lot too. Pretty standard Frank basketbrawl. Killing it in OR%, but that's not enough to win if you don't hit some shots.

Which is why sprads sucking is so bad.

Yeah.  we need two new guards quick.  WTF is up with Shane getting so much bench?

The rules of Frankhouse are
1. You do not talk about Frankhouse.
2. You DO NOT talk about Frankhouse.
3. If someone says 'stop', goes limp, or taps out, the Franking is over.
4. Only Frank knows the extent of each Franking.
5. Frank will decide when each Franking is over.
6. The Frankings are bare knuckle. No shirt, no shoes, no weapons.
7. Frankings will go on as long as they have to.
8. If this is your first time at Frankhouse, you have to be Franked.

Fantastic(sarcastically towards the franking and sincerely towards the post)

Sent from my MB611 using Tapatalk