Author Topic: JO  (Read 34144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #175 on: January 24, 2012, 11:15:40 AM »
Decision to be made after today's practice as to if he travels.  Sounds like he's going to, seeing as he's practicing.

Granted, I doubt he plays.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #176 on: January 24, 2012, 11:17:46 AM »
Decision to be made after today's practice as to if he travels.  Sounds like he's going to, seeing as he's practicing.

Granted, I doubt he plays.

I'm certain he is. At this point Frank is just putting the finishing touches on his Franking around with JO.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4589
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: JO
« Reply #177 on: January 24, 2012, 11:20:29 AM »
I can't wait til he tells us how focused JO was in practice.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #178 on: January 24, 2012, 11:21:21 AM »
I can't wait til he tells us how focused JO was in practice.

I'm really hoping JO has a great game and Frank takes part of the credit. Will be fantastic.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19316
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #179 on: January 24, 2012, 11:33:27 AM »
I can't wait til he tells us how focused JO was in practice.

I'm really hoping JO has a great game and Frank takes part of the credit. Will be fantastic.

i mean, it worked with Angel too.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27138
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #180 on: January 24, 2012, 11:39:54 AM »
I'm setting the over/under on dunks at 2.5 for Tech game assuming he plays

Offline TBL

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2093
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #181 on: January 24, 2012, 11:43:09 AM »
Anyone notice the comment about how JO had been on the Prez's honor roll for 5 consec semesters? Sounds like JO hasn't been going to classes. Baaaddd JO.....      :nono:

Offline raquetcat

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
  • ^ I let us down
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: JO
« Reply #182 on: January 24, 2012, 11:44:29 AM »
I'm setting the over/under on dunks at 2.5 for Tech game assuming he plays
Over, I say he gets 4, and hits a 3!
I'm purple down

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36764
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: JO
« Reply #183 on: January 24, 2012, 11:46:31 AM »
I'm setting the over/under on dunks at 2.5 for Tech game assuming he plays
Over, I say he gets 4, and hits a 3!

If he plays a full game, I am all in on the over(3). However, if he plays, it will most likely be limited minutes.  Frank doesn't play them if they don't practice...

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #184 on: January 24, 2012, 11:47:42 AM »
Fun question on 810 today. "Who would you rather have on your team Doug? JO or Whithey"?

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36764
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #185 on: January 24, 2012, 11:48:29 AM »
Fun question on 810 today. "Who would you rather have on your team Doug? JO or Whithey"?

Right now, it's gotta be Withey.


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #186 on: January 24, 2012, 11:50:04 AM »
Fun question on 810 today. "Who would you rather have on your team Doug? JO or Whithey"?

Right now, it's gotta be Withey.


Ya, I agree. It would have been a different asnwer last year. But KU has the BITB as a bigs coach. I don't know if you guys have heard that before or not.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19316
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #187 on: January 24, 2012, 11:57:36 AM »
Fun question on 810 today. "Who would you rather have on your team Doug? JO or Whithey"?

according to rockchalktalk....Withey is the second best shot blocker in the country, behind Rhamel Brown of Manhattan.

Anthony Davis? pffft.. who cares if he has 30 more blocks. :flush:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40559
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #188 on: January 24, 2012, 12:00:53 PM »
according to rockchalktalk....Withey is the second best shot blocker in the country, behind Rhamel Brown of Manhattan.

Anthony Davis? pffft.. who cares if he has 30 more blocks. :flush:

kenpom playerstats has withey at 2nd in the country.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19316
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #189 on: January 24, 2012, 12:01:12 PM »
according to rockchalktalk....Withey is the second best shot blocker in the country, behind Rhamel Brown of Manhattan.

Anthony Davis? pffft.. who cares if he has 30 more blocks. :flush:

kenpom playerstats has withey at 2nd in the country.

block pct i know. (according to statsheet)
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #190 on: January 24, 2012, 12:01:42 PM »
What I wonder is what loophole Bosco used to get CK from being booted last season?  Bad B sample?  Medicinal prescription?  I have a pretty good idea of what I think happened but it involves nerdy, sciencey stuff about pee pee that isn't interesting to anyone.

i think bosco just decided that kelly was more important than their rule.   :dunno:


it's just a school policy, if they don't choose to apply it, they don't have to explain why or pretend any test was invalid.



curtis had the right to an appeal. he could either have appealed to the atheletic director (currie) or whatever position title bosco held plus a group of like four other campus leaders that bosco could appoint. they obv went the bosco route. every school is different.

Offline Boom Roasted

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1573
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #191 on: January 24, 2012, 12:08:59 PM »
if there's one thing this world needs more of, it's stoned 7 footers walking around like zombies.

Jason Bennett?  :dunno:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46668
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #192 on: January 24, 2012, 12:22:49 PM »
Quote from: Frank
listen, he's a smart kid. and when i told him what he needed to do, he went out and he did it.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #193 on: January 24, 2012, 12:42:46 PM »
Go Frank Go!  :fistpump:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51696
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #194 on: January 24, 2012, 01:29:58 PM »
Fun question on 810 today. "Who would you rather have on your team Doug? JO or Whithey"?

Right now, it's gotta be Withey.



Withey has shown some pretty exceptional hands for a 7 footer.

Offline theKSU

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1403
  • Team KSU
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #195 on: January 24, 2012, 02:23:51 PM »
This could turn out being one of Frank's most wonderful masterpieces.  His handiwork is really remarkable. Hopefully JO comes back with soft hands and great touch.  :thumbsup:

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19859
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #196 on: January 24, 2012, 02:32:03 PM »
get off withey's balls he was a 4 star top 30 kid.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36764
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #197 on: January 24, 2012, 02:37:57 PM »
get off withey's balls he was a 4 star top 30 kid.

No one is on his balls here, just answering who you would prefer.  I would prefer the guy who is doing pretty consistently well in the last game or two over the guy who avg'ed 8min/gm and one suspension in his last three games.

Maybe it's just me.

Not addressing future potential here.  Just a snap shot in time.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40559
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #198 on: January 24, 2012, 03:01:48 PM »
get off withey's balls he was a 4 star top 30 kid.

that now thanks to the big man whisperer has been transformed into a run of the mill, large-conference big.  pretty amazing.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #199 on: January 24, 2012, 03:07:55 PM »
get off withey's balls he was a 4 star top 30 kid.

that now thanks to the big man whisperer has been transformed into a run of the mill, large-conference big.  pretty amazing.

 :lol:

That was damn good sys.