Author Topic: Receivers  (Read 1559 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AST

  • nip nip weiner
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
Receivers
« on: January 06, 2012, 08:23:12 PM »
Any chance we get any that aren't garbage anytime soon.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14365
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2012, 08:24:35 PM »
Any chance we get any that aren't garbage anytime soon.
^Pretty solid meltdown right here

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2012, 08:25:26 PM »
Haven't seen a bad drop yet, contrary to the announcers ramblings.  This isn't the NFL, receivers aren't gonna catch bad balls they barely get their hands on the majority of the time.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4379
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: Receivers
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2012, 08:26:31 PM »
Haven't seen a bad drop yet, contrary to the announcers ramblings.  This isn't the NFL, receivers aren't gonna catch bad balls they barely get their hands on the majority of the time.
Thompson should have had his.  It wasn't horrible, though

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2012, 08:27:16 PM »
Ok, now I have.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4379
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Receivers
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2012, 08:27:25 PM »
And then also that one. . .

Offline We Are Better Than You

  • Sons of the Soil
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 682
  • KU > K-State
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2012, 08:28:11 PM »
Any chance we get any that aren't garbage anytime soon.

Your receivers are the crap... minus "the"...
EMAW mods fold like the K-State D-Line...welcome back, Jack!

Offline That_Guy

  • I'm just, "That Guy!"
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2788
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2012, 08:28:39 PM »
What the eff!

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2012, 08:28:55 PM »
That should get Smith a swift kick in the junk.  We needed that.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2012, 08:29:23 PM »
Any chance we get any that aren't garbage anytime soon.

Your receivers are the crap... minus "the"...

Interesting, your awesome receivers haven't done crap.  So there's that.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8329
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2012, 08:31:28 PM »
Droprick smith. Go back to slinging schwag to dormkids and juntion city trash :chainsaw:

Offline AST

  • nip nip weiner
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2012, 08:31:34 PM »
Any chance we get any that aren't garbage anytime soon.
^Pretty solid meltdown right here
^pretty solid blindness right here
Justin Long made better catches in Dodgeball than Thompson's attempt.  Harper should of had the 1st one, CK should have tucked the 2nd one.  Broderick, ....

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14365
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2012, 08:33:42 PM »
Any chance we get any that aren't garbage anytime soon.
^Pretty solid meltdown right here
^pretty solid blindness right here
Justin Long made better catches in Dodgeball than Thompson's attempt.  Harper should of had the 1st one, CK should have tucked the 2nd one.  Broderick, ....
My bad. I didn't realize we were basing our opinions of players on one game. I agree. They have played terrible today.

Offline We Are Better Than You

  • Sons of the Soil
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 682
  • KU > K-State
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #13 on: January 06, 2012, 08:36:26 PM »
Any chance we get any that aren't garbage anytime soon.

Your receivers are the crap... minus "the"...

Interesting, your awesome receivers haven't done crap.  So there's that.

What do you think Joe Adams is? Good call jackass
EMAW mods fold like the K-State D-Line...welcome back, Jack!

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #14 on: January 06, 2012, 08:37:22 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Offline We Are Better Than You

  • Sons of the Soil
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 682
  • KU > K-State
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2012, 08:41:09 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Wasn't talking about the passing game... We were talking about receivers... He's a receiver... that made you guys look silly...
EMAW mods fold like the K-State D-Line...welcome back, Jack!

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2012, 08:42:23 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Wasn't talking about the passing game... We were talking about receivers... He's a receiver... that made you guys look silly...

Agreed, you look pretty stupid falling on your face.

Offline We Are Better Than You

  • Sons of the Soil
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 682
  • KU > K-State
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2012, 08:42:57 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Wasn't talking about the passing game... We were talking about receivers... He's a receiver... that made you guys look silly...

Agreed, you look pretty stupid falling on your face.

Nice comeback, junior...
EMAW mods fold like the K-State D-Line...welcome back, Jack!

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1254
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #18 on: January 06, 2012, 08:43:26 PM »
Harper didn't even see the ball on a catchable sideline pass.  And now we have given up on throwing down field.  Ugh
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline AST

  • nip nip weiner
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2012, 08:43:43 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Wasn't talking about the passing game... We were talking about receivers... He's a receiver... that made you guys look silly...
Yes, that was one of the better punt receivings I've ever seen...

 :dunno:

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #20 on: January 06, 2012, 08:44:23 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Wasn't talking about the passing game... We were talking about receivers... He's a receiver... that made you guys look silly...

Agreed, you look pretty stupid falling on your face.

Nice comeback, junior...

Wow, keep up pops, you was a generalization.  JFC you guys are slow.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14365
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #21 on: January 06, 2012, 08:44:45 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Wasn't talking about the passing game... We were talking about receivers... He's a receiver... that made you guys look silly...
Yes, that was one of the better punt receivings I've ever seen...

 :dunno:
lol

Offline We Are Better Than You

  • Sons of the Soil
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 682
  • KU > K-State
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #22 on: January 06, 2012, 08:46:01 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

Wasn't talking about the passing game... We were talking about receivers... He's a receiver... that made you guys look silly...

Agreed, you look pretty stupid falling on your face.

Nice comeback, junior...

you guys are slow.

So is your defense...
EMAW mods fold like the K-State D-Line...welcome back, Jack!

Offline We Are Better Than You

  • Sons of the Soil
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 682
  • KU > K-State
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #23 on: January 06, 2012, 08:49:11 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

It's ok... You can rewind that pass/catch... If you can afford DVR...
EMAW mods fold like the K-State D-Line...welcome back, Jack!

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Receivers
« Reply #24 on: January 06, 2012, 08:50:00 PM »
Was that the vaunted passing game?  Jackass.

It's ok... You can rewind that pass/catch... If you can afford DVR...

Wow, 79 passing yards in only one half!  Color me impressed.   :jerk: