Auburn had to have an onside kick to beat Utah St.(?). Arkansas had to have a miracle comeback to beat A&M.
After LSU/Bama it's a dramatic drop off this year.
Close games when they shouldn't be close is college football and proves nothing. Good teams win when they are down. The Arky A&M game is a classic example of a team stepping up in the second half and playing to their talent level. Tyler Wilson threw for over 500 yards in that game for crying out loud. Thats not a miracle thats taking care of business. He is a first year starting QB and deserves much respect for that showing.
I agree that score comparisons isn't very useful. However, I don't believe that Auburn was substantially better at football than Utah State. Nor do I think that Arkansas is substantially better than aTm.
These sorts of comparisons aren't perfect, let's do it this way:
LSU > all big 12 teams
Bama > all big 12 teams
Rest of SEC < OU, OSU
Arkansas = KSU, UT, TCU, WVU
South Carolina = KSU, UT, TCU, WVU
Georgia = KSU, UT, TCU, WVU
Florida < KSU, UT, TCU, WVU
Mizzou and aTm < KSU, OU, OSU, UT, TCU, WVU
Vandy, Tenn, Kentucky, Auburn, Ole Miss, Miss State, < all big 12 teams except KU, and maybe Tech
Again, if both conference throw out their top two teams, you cannot make the argument that one is really much better than the other. If anything, the Big 12 has fewer crap teams.