0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 26, 2011, 01:37:22 PMQuote from: Trim on December 26, 2011, 01:21:39 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on December 26, 2011, 12:35:16 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 26, 2011, 12:17:39 PMAt this point I'm sure he's doing this for the sake of the board. Does he not realize the gap between teams who make the sweet 16 as opposed to those who don't make the NIT?Quote With a week off now before a final nonconference game versus Howard, the question will be whether some of the treasures KSU uncovered in Waikiki were for real (if so, this is a Top 15-20 team with more upside to be had considering not all cylinders were firing), or more along the lines of Jim Wooldridge's fool's gold. http://www.kitchenkc.com/2011/12/k-state-treasures-found-in-hawaii.htmlHe has to be, this team isn't even close to a Wooly team.I don't think he's comparing the team to a Wooly edition. I think he just thought it would be clever to use the "Wooly fool's gold" line to describe the possibility that their play in Hawaii was a fluke.Maybe I'm wrong and I'm Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)-blind after his $10 donation to BBBS.Using the term "fools gold" as it relates to Wooly doesn't refer to his teams being male genitals teases, I've only heard it used in reference to how Jim once referred three point shots as. So i read it as "a Jim Wooldridge team who famously thought three point shots we're fools gold.". If he is using it like you're reading it, which is possible, then its equally stupid because this team has accomplished about 100x of that of any Wooly team ever did in the non-con. Not even close, a ridiculous comparison.I think he was trying to say that the Hawaii play could be an aberration, and he chose "Wooly's fool gold" as his term for aberration because it seemed insider-y, but that he didn't mean to compare the team to any aspect of the Wooly era.
Quote from: Trim on December 26, 2011, 01:21:39 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on December 26, 2011, 12:35:16 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 26, 2011, 12:17:39 PMAt this point I'm sure he's doing this for the sake of the board. Does he not realize the gap between teams who make the sweet 16 as opposed to those who don't make the NIT?Quote With a week off now before a final nonconference game versus Howard, the question will be whether some of the treasures KSU uncovered in Waikiki were for real (if so, this is a Top 15-20 team with more upside to be had considering not all cylinders were firing), or more along the lines of Jim Wooldridge's fool's gold. http://www.kitchenkc.com/2011/12/k-state-treasures-found-in-hawaii.htmlHe has to be, this team isn't even close to a Wooly team.I don't think he's comparing the team to a Wooly edition. I think he just thought it would be clever to use the "Wooly fool's gold" line to describe the possibility that their play in Hawaii was a fluke.Maybe I'm wrong and I'm Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)-blind after his $10 donation to BBBS.Using the term "fools gold" as it relates to Wooly doesn't refer to his teams being male genitals teases, I've only heard it used in reference to how Jim once referred three point shots as. So i read it as "a Jim Wooldridge team who famously thought three point shots we're fools gold.". If he is using it like you're reading it, which is possible, then its equally stupid because this team has accomplished about 100x of that of any Wooly team ever did in the non-con. Not even close, a ridiculous comparison.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on December 26, 2011, 12:35:16 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 26, 2011, 12:17:39 PMAt this point I'm sure he's doing this for the sake of the board. Does he not realize the gap between teams who make the sweet 16 as opposed to those who don't make the NIT?Quote With a week off now before a final nonconference game versus Howard, the question will be whether some of the treasures KSU uncovered in Waikiki were for real (if so, this is a Top 15-20 team with more upside to be had considering not all cylinders were firing), or more along the lines of Jim Wooldridge's fool's gold. http://www.kitchenkc.com/2011/12/k-state-treasures-found-in-hawaii.htmlHe has to be, this team isn't even close to a Wooly team.I don't think he's comparing the team to a Wooly edition. I think he just thought it would be clever to use the "Wooly fool's gold" line to describe the possibility that their play in Hawaii was a fluke.Maybe I'm wrong and I'm Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)-blind after his $10 donation to BBBS.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 26, 2011, 12:17:39 PMAt this point I'm sure he's doing this for the sake of the board. Does he not realize the gap between teams who make the sweet 16 as opposed to those who don't make the NIT?Quote With a week off now before a final nonconference game versus Howard, the question will be whether some of the treasures KSU uncovered in Waikiki were for real (if so, this is a Top 15-20 team with more upside to be had considering not all cylinders were firing), or more along the lines of Jim Wooldridge's fool's gold. http://www.kitchenkc.com/2011/12/k-state-treasures-found-in-hawaii.htmlHe has to be, this team isn't even close to a Wooly team.
At this point I'm sure he's doing this for the sake of the board. Does he not realize the gap between teams who make the sweet 16 as opposed to those who don't make the NIT?Quote With a week off now before a final nonconference game versus Howard, the question will be whether some of the treasures KSU uncovered in Waikiki were for real (if so, this is a Top 15-20 team with more upside to be had considering not all cylinders were firing), or more along the lines of Jim Wooldridge's fool's gold. http://www.kitchenkc.com/2011/12/k-state-treasures-found-in-hawaii.html
With a week off now before a final nonconference game versus Howard, the question will be whether some of the treasures KSU uncovered in Waikiki were for real (if so, this is a Top 15-20 team with more upside to be had considering not all cylinders were firing), or more along the lines of Jim Wooldridge's fool's gold.
It's sad that this needed an explanation.
Fair enough, I guess I just didn't realize MIR was such a complete dumbass.
Quote from: pissclams on December 26, 2011, 04:56:08 PMFair enough, I guess I just didn't realize MIR was such a complete dumbass.Meh, he's got beef with Kitchen. He zealously picks apart Kitchen's blogs the way I do brad essex's.
Quote from: Trim on December 26, 2011, 04:58:11 PMQuote from: pissclams on December 26, 2011, 04:56:08 PMFair enough, I guess I just didn't realize MIR was such a complete dumbass.Meh, he's got beef with Kitchen. He zealously picks apart Kitchen's blogs the way I do brad essex's.No beef with Curtis. I'd equate it to your "beef" with Huggins. The issue isn't so much the subject himself, but more so how he is viewed by humanoids and how the narrow view of these idiots attempt to change the proper narrative. BTW your Huggins lovers and my Kitchen lovers are the same damn people.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 26, 2011, 08:44:59 PMQuote from: Trim on December 26, 2011, 04:58:11 PMQuote from: pissclams on December 26, 2011, 04:56:08 PMFair enough, I guess I just didn't realize MIR was such a complete dumbass.Meh, he's got beef with Kitchen. He zealously picks apart Kitchen's blogs the way I do brad essex's.No beef with Curtis. I'd equate it to your "beef" with Huggins. The issue isn't so much the subject himself, but more so how he is viewed by humanoids and how the narrow view of these idiots attempt to change the proper narrative. BTW your Huggins lovers and my Kitchen lovers are the same damn people.I hate Huggins AND the people that don't hate him.
I've been calling Kitchen a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) for years. Nice to see some of you joining in finally.
