Author Topic: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?  (Read 11444 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30960
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« on: December 18, 2011, 04:44:06 PM »
Have been eyeballing the Sony NEX, but it's a bit pricier than what I wanted to spend, at $450.

Here are my criteria:
1.  Really, really good auto focus.
2.  That burst of photos thing for snapping off a bunch in a row while still maintaining the quality.
3.  Shape should be more like an SLR and not a little point and shoot rectangle.

The Sony NEX seems like the best option for me, but I'd love to find one for $100- $200 cheaper.


Any of you photo nerds have a sure fire option for me?


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47984
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2011, 05:04:19 PM »
Canon S100, this is not even a contest.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47984
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2011, 05:06:53 PM »
actually just buy the s95, it's cheaper.  it's what i have.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30960
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2011, 05:28:10 PM »
OK, I like the idea of the s95 being $150 cheaper.  But, help a layman, such as myself, out on why these cannons are superior.  Very ignorant.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55985
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47984
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2011, 06:24:44 PM »
OK, I like the idea of the s95 being $150 cheaper.  But, help a layman, such as myself, out on why these cannons are superior.  Very ignorant.

you basically want the best CMOS sensor you can find for the money which allows the camera to operate in low light conditions and with the lowest amount of noise as possible.  the s95 provides that.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30960
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2011, 06:29:51 PM »
OK, the S95 it is.  Got it for $298.99.  So, that's good.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47984
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2011, 06:31:08 PM »
it's a great camera, you'll love it.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2011, 07:10:22 PM »
OK, the S95 it is.  Got it for $298.99.  So, that's good.

You should have got the Sony.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30960
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2011, 07:27:52 PM »
OK, the S95 it is.  Got it for $298.99.  So, that's good.

You should have got the Sony.

I have $150 that begs to differ.  :cool:

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55985
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47984
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #12 on: December 19, 2011, 07:49:28 AM »
wow that's a great price


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88741
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #13 on: December 19, 2011, 07:54:20 AM »
OK, the S95 it is.  Got it for $298.99.  So, that's good.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003ZSHNGS/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?t=slicinc-20&tag=slicinc-20&ie=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER

Pete, we need to have a sit down talk about using the internet to make purchases.  good lord. 

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19410
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #14 on: December 19, 2011, 07:57:45 AM »
OK, the S95 it is.  Got it for $298.99.  So, that's good.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003ZSHNGS/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?t=slicinc-20&tag=slicinc-20&ie=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER

Pete, we need to have a sit down talk about using the internet to make purchases.  good lord. 

haha.

thinking about getting this now. i don't NEED it.. but...
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #15 on: December 19, 2011, 08:53:14 AM »
OK, I like the idea of the s95 being $150 cheaper.  But, help a layman, such as myself, out on why these cannons are superior.  Very ignorant.

you basically want the best CMOS sensor you can find for the money which allows the camera to operate in low light conditions and with the lowest amount of noise as possible.  the s95 provides that.
Mods, merge with aggieville creepstr thread?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30960
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #16 on: December 19, 2011, 03:49:00 PM »
Guise, I'm good, thanks.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #17 on: December 19, 2011, 08:27:14 PM »
Guise, I'm good, thanks.



I have $150 that begs to differ.  :cool:


Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30960
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #18 on: December 19, 2011, 08:34:22 PM »

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2012, 09:14:01 PM »
high camera iq guys, wife wants a Nikon D3100 14.2 megapixel digital SLR.  anyone have or no if it's a good camera?  wife said reviews were good, but when i looked they were very mixed.    :dunno:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47984
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #20 on: April 15, 2012, 09:55:46 PM »
i'm a canon man myself

this site is good
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/



Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline KCFDcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2436
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2012, 12:20:10 AM »
high camera iq guys, wife wants a Nikon D3100 14.2 megapixel digital SLR.  anyone have or no if it's a good camera?  wife said reviews were good, but when i looked they were very mixed.    :dunno:

I have a d3100, had it about a year. do lots of picture taking and such. it's a great camera, don't let retards who review these things tell you otherwise. they all expect it to work like a point and shoot camera, and when it doesn't they think it's because the camera is bad.

pro tip: if you've never owned one beforetake a short class on how to really use a dslr camera. makes a huge difference.

Offline FP TC etc.

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2301
  • USA! USA! USA!
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #22 on: April 16, 2012, 01:03:44 AM »
Canon > all others.

And it's not even close.

Offline KCFDcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2436
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #23 on: April 17, 2012, 03:48:41 PM »
Canon > all others.

And it's not even close.

 :lol: I can't even begin to explain to you why you're wrong. just no.

Offline slimz

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: What is best camera below an SLR for the money?
« Reply #24 on: April 17, 2012, 04:36:25 PM »
high camera iq guys, wife wants a Nikon D3100 14.2 megapixel digital SLR.  anyone have or no if it's a good camera?  wife said reviews were good, but when i looked they were very mixed.    :dunno:

A cameraphone or a toy camera can be a "good camera," depending on the situation and photographer. What does your wife want to do with it now? What has she used in the past? What does she want to do with it in the future?

Reviews are hit-or-miss for helpfulness, because they may be influenced by a factor that's not going to come into play with your use of the camera. A camera that doesn't work well for one person's particular requirements may be the best option for a person with different requirements.

The 3100 is comparable to the Canon 500D / 550D. They're all fine cameras. The differences in specs might or might not make a difference depending on intended use and level of photographer. For instance, a professional wedding photographer would probably prefer a different camera due to low-light performance and responsiveness.

If your wife has big plans for a photography future that might include upgrading the camera body, then that's something to consider now, because she's going to be spending money on lenses, and may want to be reasonably sure that when she upgrades, it will be to a higher-spec model from the same manufacturer, since she'll already have the glass.

If she hasn't already, she should get in and play with the different option in person. Given the relatively minor differences in specs between similar cameras, it's more important to use a camera that you're comfortable using, so you don't miss shots or get too frustrated.

Finally, if she's wanting something she's going to carry around all the time, she may want to look at a more compact system, like Sony NEX or the micro 4/3 offerings. Gives you the advantage of interchangeable lenses in a smaller size.