fox

[steve dave]

[steve dave]

fair and balanced Y axis

[420seriouscat69]

When was the last time we had a decent president? And please don't say Clinton, that pigfuker!

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

fair and balanced Y axis

If you're implying it should be more of a straight line, I agree.   


Sent from my TerreStar Genus using TapaTalk

[steve dave]

i'm saying it should be an actual y axis. though their market (you) probably doesn't know what a y axis is or why this is hilarious. 

[CHONGS]

[Rage Against the McKee]

[06wildcat]

For the 'tards :johndoug:

[jmlynch1]

Everyone knows the summer heat makes a %9.2 alot closer to a %10.0 rather than a %9.0

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

i'm saying it should be an actual y axis. though their market (you) probably doesn't know what a y axis is or why this is hilarious. 

Go ahead and plot it out and you will find that should be more of a straight line, which is what I was saying. Those that can read numbers will know the line is not accurate. 

[jmlynch1]

i'm saying it should be an actual y axis. though their market (you) probably doesn't know what a y axis is or why this is hilarious. 

Go ahead and plot it out and you will find that should be more of a straight line, which is what I was saying. Those that can read numbers will know the line is not accurate. 

aaaaaand we are back to SD's point about their market.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

i'm saying it should be an actual y axis. though their market (you) probably doesn't know what a y axis is or why this is hilarious. 

Go ahead and plot it out and you will find that should be more of a straight line, which is what I was saying. Those that can read numbers will know the line is not accurate. 

aaaaaand we are back to SD's point about their market.

SD and the minions didn't understand my comment,  yet said I was too dumb to undersand the graph . 

[jmlynch1]

i'm saying it should be an actual y axis. though their market (you) probably doesn't know what a y axis is or why this is hilarious. 

Go ahead and plot it out and you will find that should be more of a straight line, which is what I was saying. Those that can read numbers will know the line is not accurate. 

aaaaaand we are back to SD's point about their market.

SD and the minions didn't understand my comment,  yet said I was too dumb to undersand the graph . 

Your comment is irrelevant to the fact that Fox is distorting their data/information.

[chum1]

If you're going to be picky about it, though, the plot would not be a line perpindicular to the y axis.  For that, the values for y would be the same, such as 9.0, 9.0,  ... , 9.0.  But I don't see how this plot favors one side or the other any more than an accurate plot would.  Seems like fair and balanced sloppiness.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

i'm saying it should be an actual y axis. though their market (you) probably doesn't know what a y axis is or why this is hilarious. 

Go ahead and plot it out and you will find that should be more of a straight line, which is what I was saying. Those that can read numbers will know the line is not accurate. 

aaaaaand we are back to SD's point about their market.

SD and the minions didn't understand my comment,  yet said I was too dumb to undersand the graph . 

Your comment is irrelevant to the fact that Fox is distorting their data/information.

It's hilarious you guys are worried about fox's accuracy plotting points when the real problem is the actual data.  The unemployment numbers are complete  

[jmlynch1]

I think Hotdogs are wonderful!
Sent from my TerreStar Genus using TapaTalk

[jmlynch1]

Why aren't you guys talking about my comment about hotdogs!!!
Sent from my TerreStar Genus using TapaTalk

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

I wish I understood stuff better.

Sent from my '82 AMC Pacer using TapaTalk

[Rage Against the McKee]

If you're going to be picky about it, though, the plot would not be a line perpindicular to the y axis.  For that, the values for y would be the same, such as 9.0, 9.0,  ... , 9.0.  But I don't see how this plot favors one side or the other any more than an accurate plot would.  Seems like fair and balanced sloppiness.

The real problem is the final point, 8.6%. This should be the lowest point on the graph, but it would make Obama look good if the graph had a downward trend, so they just put it on a point horizontal from the previous point, 9.0%.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

If you're going to be picky about it, though, the plot would not be a line perpindicular to the y axis.  For that, the values for y would be the same, such as 9.0, 9.0,  ... , 9.0.  But I don't see how this plot favors one side or the other any more than an accurate plot would.  Seems like fair and balanced sloppiness.

The real problem is the final point, 8.6%. This should be the lowest point on the graph, but it would make Obama look good if the graph had a downward trend, so they just put it on a point horizontal from the previous point, 9.0%.

Yeah, dropping to a new low of 8.6, as we head into the holidays, would make Obama look great! The graph is a funny mistake, but the real numbers are just sad.

[Rage Against the McKee]

If you're going to be picky about it, though, the plot would not be a line perpindicular to the y axis.  For that, the values for y would be the same, such as 9.0, 9.0,  ... , 9.0.  But I don't see how this plot favors one side or the other any more than an accurate plot would.  Seems like fair and balanced sloppiness.

The real problem is the final point, 8.6%. This should be the lowest point on the graph, but it would make Obama look good if the graph had a downward trend, so they just put it on a point horizontal from the previous point, 9.0%.

Yeah, dropping to a new low of 8.6, as we head into the holidays, would make Obama look great! The graph is a funny mistake, but the real numbers are just sad.

Look at where 8.6 would fall on that Y-axis and notice how sharp that decline should be.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

If you're going to be picky about it, though, the plot would not be a line perpindicular to the y axis.  For that, the values for y would be the same, such as 9.0, 9.0,  ... , 9.0.  But I don't see how this plot favors one side or the other any more than an accurate plot would.  Seems like fair and balanced sloppiness.

The real problem is the final point, 8.6%. This should be the lowest point on the graph, but it would make Obama look good if the graph had a downward trend, so they just put it on a point horizontal from the previous point, 9.0%.

Yeah, dropping to a new low of 8.6, as we head into the holidays, would make Obama look great! The graph is a funny mistake, but the real numbers are just sad.

Look at where 8.6 would fall on that Y-axis and notice how sharp that decline should be.

[LickNeckey]

It has been said that the fact that Time wouldn't mentio the TEA party due to an agenda.

But this graph is simply a "funny mistake" 

[Stupid Fitz]

I find the left's Fox news obsession to be fascinating.  I mean, there are so many obvious left pointing news organizations, but Fox being right just makes them crazy.  Very odd. 

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

It has been said that the fact that Time wouldn't mentio the TEA party due to an agenda.

But this graph is simply a "funny mistake" 

No, what's funny is stating that 8.6 is a sharp decline.  

But, I suppose come January when it goes back up to 9.2, that won't be a sharp increase.