0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It's pretty obvious TCU is not going to get 16 or above. Baylor and OU still have top 10 computer rankings.WE ARE GOING BCS
Quote from: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 11:42:05 AMIt's pretty obvious TCU is not going to get 16 or above. Baylor and OU still have top 10 computer rankings.WE ARE GOING BCSwrong, CPU avg rankings for TCU last week was 18. Mich St was at 16 and Texas was at 17. TCU will be at least 16 in the computers meaning we are mumped
Quote from: scottwildcat on December 04, 2011, 11:47:02 AMQuote from: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 11:42:05 AMIt's pretty obvious TCU is not going to get 16 or above. Baylor and OU still have top 10 computer rankings.WE ARE GOING BCSwrong, CPU avg rankings for TCU last week was 18. Mich St was at 16 and Texas was at 17. TCU will be at least 16 in the computers meaning we are mumpedWrong.
Quote from: scottwildcat on December 04, 2011, 11:47:02 AMQuote from: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 11:42:05 AMIt's pretty obvious TCU is not going to get 16 or above. Baylor and OU still have top 10 computer rankings.WE ARE GOING BCSwrong, CPU avg rankings for TCU last week was 18. Mich St was at 16 and Texas was at 17. TCU will be at least 16 in the computers meaning we are mumpedand UGA at 14...its not looking good for the KSU Fighting Cats of EMAW football team
BCSGuru BCS Guru And as projected, Michigan should be in good shape but TCU is not going to make it.
CBS has the BCS up:http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankingsSorry, OSU
So you all know that's a projection right? One that's way off too. They have Alabama with almost double the lead as they actually have against OSU in the Coaches.
Quote from: J on December 04, 2011, 11:56:50 AMQuote from: scottwildcat on December 04, 2011, 11:47:02 AMQuote from: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 11:42:05 AMIt's pretty obvious TCU is not going to get 16 or above. Baylor and OU still have top 10 computer rankings.WE ARE GOING BCSwrong, CPU avg rankings for TCU last week was 18. Mich St was at 16 and Texas was at 17. TCU will be at least 16 in the computers meaning we are mumpedWrong.really?http://espn.go.com/college-football/bcs
Quote from: scottwildcat on December 04, 2011, 11:58:46 AMQuote from: J on December 04, 2011, 11:56:50 AMQuote from: scottwildcat on December 04, 2011, 11:47:02 AMQuote from: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 11:42:05 AMIt's pretty obvious TCU is not going to get 16 or above. Baylor and OU still have top 10 computer rankings.WE ARE GOING BCSwrong, CPU avg rankings for TCU last week was 18. Mich St was at 16 and Texas was at 17. TCU will be at least 16 in the computers meaning we are mumpedWrong.really?http://espn.go.com/college-football/bcsNo you are wrong about the "we are mumped" part. I would suggest studying the BCS before spouting educated bullshit.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
Can anyone explain how the eff Michigan jumped all the way up to 12 in the BCS while sitting on their asses? I know everyone slobbers over Michigan, but this is rough ridin' ridiculous.