Author Topic: Not looking very junkyardy  (Read 4896 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20648
    • View Profile
Re: Not looking very junkyardy
« Reply #25 on: March 04, 2010, 06:27:16 AM »
really the only thing that I'm upset about is that 3rd kelly foul.  I guess the samuels double foul too.  I just don't see how you call either of those.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Not looking very junkyardy
« Reply #26 on: March 04, 2010, 09:44:04 AM »
really the only thing that I'm upset about is that 3rd kelly foul.  I guess the samuels double foul too.  I just don't see how you call either of those.

kelly's 1st foul was not even close.  at least the part they showed on the replay.  bestinthebiz reid gettys agrees

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20648
    • View Profile
Re: Not looking very junkyardy
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2010, 09:55:12 AM »
 I missed his first and second.

Offline DILLIGAF

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 179
    • View Profile
Re: Not looking very junkyardy
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2010, 12:31:13 PM »
First and third were phantom fouls, the second at best a no call or call on our other guy (forget who actually made contact), from there it doesn't matter, we're DOOM'd.