Author Topic: sweet jesus refs  (Read 10811 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2010, 09:40:34 PM »
The reffing was pretty one sided...but we aren't gonna win when the hawks shoot 50%+

How was it one sided?  :dunno:  Serious question.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2010, 09:40:56 PM »
give it up, fff.   you left your posting abilities at the other site.

What the f*ck do you know about posting abilities?

all you do is bitch about non-important things.  remember when you made videos and things like that?  you were funny and stuff.  now you just come off as a whinier, less intelligent, less old dax.

What exactly do you bring to the table?  :dunno:

did I say I was a quality poster?   :dunno:

Just think that F3 used to be something, and now he's a whiny shell.  At this point, Dobbie is a better bbs'er than him.  

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2010, 09:41:02 PM »
pissclams, let that wound heal. It will, eventually.


Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47965
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #28 on: March 03, 2010, 09:41:32 PM »
pissclams, let that wound heal. It will, eventually.


it's all in fun trips, don't sweat the technique.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #29 on: March 03, 2010, 09:51:16 PM »
The reffing was pretty one sided...but we aren't gonna win when the hawks shoot 50%+

How was it one sided?  :dunno:  Serious question.

It wasn't. They called more fouls on uk im guessing. However, they let Aldrich and company rape our bigs down low, but wouldnt let Taylor touch our guards at all. Plus Kelly picked up about 3 phantom fouls...as well as the Samuels double foul bullshit. We just got hurt where it counts.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Andy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 872
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2010, 09:01:17 AM »
The reffing was pretty one sided...but we aren't gonna win when the hawks shoot 50%+
How was it one sided?  :dunno:  Serious question.
It wasn't. They called more fouls on uk im guessing. However, they let Aldrich and company rape our bigs down low, but wouldnt let Taylor touch our guards at all. Plus Kelly picked up about 3 phantom fouls...as well as the Samuels double foul bullshit. We just got hurt where it counts.

kelly is going to have to stop whining or he's gonna get picked on like that

Offline bleedpurple

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2010, 09:20:06 AM »
Too many costly turnovers that immediately resulted in points, the inability for us to stay in front of their guards led to multiple dribble drives/fouls/layups/open 3's on kick outs, which forced us into a zone that we aren't capable of playing as well.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2010, 09:25:33 AM »
kelly is going to have to stop whining.

stfu, tmcats.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • I found my password
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1823
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #33 on: March 04, 2010, 09:36:56 AM »
If I were a KU player I'd be pissed off/embarrassed about this game because the refs obviously thought KU couldn't win on its own.




 :bawl:  <-- me in this post, I know
« Last Edit: March 04, 2010, 09:40:47 AM by Ghost of Stan Parrish »
"I'm thankful our MHK forefathers had the foresight to lynch white dudes so that we might be able to throw up the mob with a clear conscience."

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #34 on: March 04, 2010, 10:54:39 AM »
I hope those refs are saying "Dey took der jerrrbs!" today

If you think the officiating had nothing to do with the way this game was played you are dumb. end of story.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #35 on: March 04, 2010, 10:55:33 AM »
I hope those refs are saying "Dey took der jerrrbs!" today

If you think the officiating had nothing to do with the way this game was played you are dumb. end of story.

jfc, is this not true for every f'n game???
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #36 on: March 04, 2010, 03:46:07 PM »
The reffing was pretty one sided...but we aren't gonna win when the hawks shoot 50%+
How was it one sided?  :dunno:  Serious question.
It wasn't. They called more fouls on uk im guessing. However, they let Aldrich and company rape our bigs down low, but wouldnt let Taylor touch our guards at all. Plus Kelly picked up about 3 phantom fouls...as well as the Samuels double foul bullshit. We just got hurt where it counts.

kelly is going to have to stop whining or he's gonna get picked on like that


I don't blame Kelly for whining about the fouls called on him yesterday, most of them were bullshit calls.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53929
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #37 on: March 04, 2010, 03:47:58 PM »
I didn't think the refs were all that bad.  The 2 quickies on Kelly suck because that shut him down quick and led to a Colon Colonic but otherwise, they wuz all right.


Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #38 on: March 04, 2010, 03:51:12 PM »
1.  K-State shot more free throws than KU

2.  K-State had less fouls than KU

Offline JavaCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 419
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #39 on: March 04, 2010, 03:54:43 PM »
1.  K-State shot more free throws than KU

2.  K-State had less fouls than KU

Way to read a box score and not understand anything about the game of basketball. If Kelly doesn't get 3 phantom calls the game is at least close until the end. KU still would've won though.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #40 on: March 04, 2010, 03:56:55 PM »
1.  K-State shot more free throws than KU

2.  K-State had less fouls than KU

Way to read a box score and not understand anything about the game of basketball. If Kelly doesn't get 3 phantom calls the game is at least close until the end. KU still would've won though.




The refs last night were fine... you guys just can't admit that KU is the better team. 

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55967
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #41 on: March 04, 2010, 03:57:31 PM »
1.  K-State shot more free throws than KU

2.  K-State had less fouls than KU

Way to read a box score and not understand anything about the game of basketball. If Kelly doesn't get 3 phantom calls the game is at least close until the end. KU still would've won though.




The refs last night were fine... you guys just can't admit that KU is the better team. 

pretty sure that's exactly what he admitted.  :dunno:

Offline monumentcat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 117
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #42 on: March 04, 2010, 04:11:26 PM »
The only issue I had was the double T on Jamar when he was dragged down by the throat by one of the mongoloid twins.  That was one of the worst calls I have ever seen. However, it had little or no effect on the outcome of the game.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53929
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #43 on: March 04, 2010, 04:12:17 PM »
1.  K-State shot more free throws than KU

2.  K-State had less fouls than KU

Way to read a box score and not understand anything about the game of basketball. If Kelly doesn't get 3 phantom calls the game is at least close until the end. KU still would've won though.




The refs last night were fine... you guys just can't admit that KU is the better team. 

JFC dude, at least read the post before posting like a doofus.  You used to not suck this hard.  Football season just destroyed you.   :facepalm:

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #44 on: March 04, 2010, 04:19:48 PM »
Sorry, I missed the part of his post where he said "KU is the better team."

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20647
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #45 on: March 04, 2010, 04:20:51 PM »
does winning no longer equate to being a better team in your bizarro world?

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53929
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #46 on: March 04, 2010, 04:21:17 PM »
Sorry, I missed the part of his post where he said "KU is the better team."

no way....   :facepalm:

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #47 on: March 04, 2010, 04:22:24 PM »
his baby killing team finally wins the conference outright, and instead of partying it up, he's still trying to get validation. 

jfc dude, we're happy for you. 

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20647
    • View Profile
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #48 on: March 04, 2010, 04:53:25 PM »
Good god what will happen if seff gets shafted on coy.

GetFipps

  • Guest
Re: sweet jesus refs
« Reply #49 on: March 04, 2010, 05:00:12 PM »
"KU still would've won though"