She will recuse, if she doesn't she likely get removed from the bench for being so clueless as to her own code of ethics. It's a conflict, plain and simple.
The CT talking point is beyond Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) and nothing but a bunch of libs looking for smoke when there is none. It's not a conflict under any interp of judicial prof resp. Sorry, libs. I would actually think the ACLU would be out bashing the people saying it is. What, is a woman supposed to stay in the home and not work? Was she supposed to know 10 years ago that that in 10 years her husband would be forced to rule on a law passed by Congress and the POTUS that was so terribly written and so intrusive on society that it actually makes it to the SCOTUS on constitutional grounds? GMAFB people. Think for once in your life.