Author Topic: Tards skipping right over Ell (Read 4707 times)

kougar24 · « **on:** November 13, 2011, 12:24:25 PM »

Now comparing The Chamber favorably to Michael Bishop.

They've gone full powerespect.

kim carnes · « **Reply #1 on:** November 13, 2011, 12:32:38 PM »

Quote from: kougar24 on November 13, 2011, 12:24:25 PM

Now comparing The Chamber favorably to Michael Bishop.

They've gone full powerespect.

hmmm... who cares?

Pete · « **Reply #2 on:** November 13, 2011, 12:39:34 PM »

I think there are quite a few posters on this site who hold Ell in higher esteem than he deserves. Partly because they pretty young when they watched him.

Personally, I think CK is every bit as good as Ell. Ell had more ability to make the big athletic play, but he was also prone to make bonehead plays (e.g. the game at UT in 2003).

kougar24 · « **Reply #3 on:** November 13, 2011, 12:41:38 PM »

Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 12:39:34 PM

I think there are quite a few posters on this site who hold Ell in higher esteem than he deserves. Partly because they pretty young when they watched him.

Personally, I think CK is every bit as good as Ell. Ell had more ability to make the big athletic play, but he was also prone to make bonehead plays (e.g. the game at UT in 2003).

You can compare him to Ell.

You can't compare him to Bishop.

hemmy · « **Reply #4 on:** November 13, 2011, 12:49:08 PM »

Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 12:39:34 PM

I think there are quite a few posters on this site who hold Ell in higher esteem than he deserves. Partly because they pretty young when they watched him.

Personally, I think CK is every bit as good as Ell. Ell had more ability to make the big athletic play, but he was also prone to make bonehead plays (e.g. the game at UT in 2003).

And if we didn't recover CK's fumble in the endzone?

HawaiiCat · « **Reply #5 on:** November 13, 2011, 12:49:40 PM »

Beasley was better than Klein too. He didn't make mistakes, and he could throw the ball pretty well.

AbeFroman · « **Reply #6 on:** November 13, 2011, 12:51:03 PM »

He is equal to ell as far as i'm concerned, although their run styles are not the same. The bishop crap is ridiculous because bish could throw it 70 yards and let someone run under it

Pete · « **Reply #7 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:04:18 PM »

Quote from: hemmy on November 13, 2011, 12:49:08 PM

Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 12:39:34 PM
I think there are quite a few posters on this site who hold Ell in higher esteem than he deserves. Partly because they pretty young when they watched him.

Personally, I think CK is every bit as good as Ell. Ell had more ability to make the big athletic play, but he was also prone to make bonehead plays (e.g. the game at UT in 2003).

And if we didn't recover CK's fumble in the endzone?

Meh...I'll give it to the guy trying to win the game on a TD, versus the guy carrying it like a loaf of bread.

Also, I'll take CK over Beasley.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #8 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:10:44 PM »

All of the DoD QBs had top 10 defenses, CK is doing it without a net

michigancat · « **Reply #9 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:16:13 PM »

Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 01:04:18 PM

Quote from: hemmy on November 13, 2011, 12:49:08 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 12:39:34 PM
I think there are quite a few posters on this site who hold Ell in higher esteem than he deserves. Partly because they pretty young when they watched him.

Personally, I think CK is every bit as good as Ell. Ell had more ability to make the big athletic play, but he was also prone to make bonehead plays (e.g. the game at UT in 2003).

And if we didn't recover CK's fumble in the endzone?

Meh...I'll give it to the guy trying to win the game on a TD, versus the guy carrying it like a loaf of bread.

Also, I'll take CK over Beasley.

lol

Pete · « **Reply #10 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:17:34 PM »

Laugh it up. I will take CK over Beasley and sleep well.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #11 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:23:12 PM »

They are all pretty darn good. JMHO.

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #12 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:23:52 PM »

Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 01:17:34 PM

Laugh it up. I will take CK over Beasley and sleep well.

it's close enough that i can't understand one side lol'ing at the other. would take ell and bish a hundred times out of a hundred though.

kougar24 · « **Reply #13 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:37:43 PM »

Quote from: rick daris on November 13, 2011, 01:23:52 PM

Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 01:17:34 PM
Laugh it up. I will take CK over Beasley and sleep well.

it's close enough that i can't understand one side lol'ing at the other. would take ell and bish a hundred times out of a hundred though.

Yeah.

kim carnes · « **Reply #14 on:** November 13, 2011, 01:50:11 PM »

Quote from: rick daris on November 13, 2011, 01:23:52 PM

Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 01:17:34 PM
Laugh it up. I will take CK over Beasley and sleep well.

it's close enough that i can't understand one side lol'ing at the other. would take ell and bish a hundred times out of a hundred though.

Ell would have been out for the season five games ago with turf toe because we have no running back.

Trim · « **Reply #15 on:** November 13, 2011, 02:15:12 PM »

Quote from: kim carnes on November 13, 2011, 01:50:11 PM

Quote from: rick daris on November 13, 2011, 01:23:52 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 01:17:34 PM
Laugh it up. I will take CK over Beasley and sleep well.

it's close enough that i can't understand one side lol'ing at the other. would take ell and bish a hundred times out of a hundred though.

Ell would have been out for the season five games ago with turf toe because we have no running back.

Any RB out there with Ell would become a lot better. See 2003 Sproles vs. 2004 Sproles.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #16 on:** November 13, 2011, 02:20:33 PM »

Quote from: Trim on November 13, 2011, 02:15:12 PM

Quote from: kim carnes on November 13, 2011, 01:50:11 PM
Quote from: rick daris on November 13, 2011, 01:23:52 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 01:17:34 PM
Laugh it up. I will take CK over Beasley and sleep well.

it's close enough that i can't understand one side lol'ing at the other. would take ell and bish a hundred times out of a hundred though.

Ell would have been out for the season five games ago with turf toe because we have no running back.

Any RB out there with Ell would become a lot better. See 2003 Sproles vs. 2004 Sproles.

Sproles and Klein on stretch read would have been incredible.

fatty fat fat · « **Reply #17 on:** November 13, 2011, 02:27:28 PM »

thanks for the update kougar24. dipsh*t.

michigancat · « **Reply #18 on:** November 13, 2011, 02:55:58 PM »

LMAO, I was thinking Curtis Kelly over Michael Beasley.

kim carnes · « **Reply #19 on:** November 13, 2011, 03:52:30 PM »

Quote from: Trim on November 13, 2011, 02:15:12 PM

Quote from: kim carnes on November 13, 2011, 01:50:11 PM
Quote from: rick daris on November 13, 2011, 01:23:52 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 13, 2011, 01:17:34 PM
Laugh it up. I will take CK over Beasley and sleep well.

it's close enough that i can't understand one side lol'ing at the other. would take ell and bish a hundred times out of a hundred though.

Ell would have been out for the season five games ago with turf toe because we have no running back.

Any RB out there with Ell would become a lot better. See 2003 Sproles vs. 2004 Sproles.

Imagine how bad Hubert would be without Klein. Wow.

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #20 on:** November 13, 2011, 03:54:31 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on November 13, 2011, 02:55:58 PM

LMAO, I was thinking Curtis Kelly over Michael Beasley.

michigancat · « **Reply #21 on:** November 13, 2011, 04:05:56 PM »

the offense today is a lot different than it was for ell. If Ell was primarily running zone read from the shotgun, things would have been a lot different.

EMAW4life-JHL · « **Reply #22 on:** November 13, 2011, 05:35:02 PM »

I think Ell has mroe natural ability but not nearly as tough or as good of a leader as HoneyBadger.

CHONGS · « **Reply #23 on:** November 13, 2011, 05:35:57 PM »

the dirty truth is that ell was not that much faster than klein, he just looked faster to a lot of people

Kat Kid · « **Reply #24 on:** November 13, 2011, 06:21:47 PM »

Klein has not had nearly as many long runs as Ell. I don't think we can say Klein is as explosive as Ell. I don't know if that is necessarily speed, but it sure seems like it.