Author Topic: Still no word on Brod and Sheldon? (Read 3884 times)

Emo EMAW · « **on:** October 24, 2011, 01:43:31 PM »

Will play vs OU I expect?

jtksu · « **Reply #1 on:** October 24, 2011, 01:45:46 PM »

That's what I'm thinking. Also Bryce.

eastcat · « **Reply #2 on:** October 24, 2011, 01:46:32 PM »

Heard from personal source Brod mumped up his leg, whatever that means. Not sure about Sheldon.

sunny_cat · « **Reply #3 on:** October 24, 2011, 03:55:51 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on October 24, 2011, 01:45:46 PM

That's what I'm thinking. Also Bryce.

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #4 on:** October 24, 2011, 05:34:57 PM »

Kind of had it in the back of my head that this was being kept under wraps.

I only wish it were true.

kslim · « **Reply #5 on:** October 24, 2011, 05:36:26 PM »

brod is fine

jtksu · « **Reply #6 on:** October 24, 2011, 05:38:57 PM »

I thought they'd been saying all along that Brod wasn't injured. I assume a suspension.

pissclams · « **Reply #7 on:** October 24, 2011, 06:10:40 PM »

ya my guess is he got all chronic'd up and failed a drug test afterwards

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #8 on:** October 24, 2011, 06:32:24 PM »

Passing game is surprisingly better without them. Having two little guys that can go nuts deep, with Harp and the TE's underneath is working fine.

Blocking on the outside probably isn't as good though.

jtksu · « **Reply #9 on:** October 24, 2011, 06:34:55 PM »

Kinda doubt the passing offense has actually improved because of their absence. Maybe in spite of their absence. Brod is a nice possession guy.

steve dave · « **Reply #10 on:** October 24, 2011, 06:39:26 PM »

I doubt sheldon is back. just a hunch.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #11 on:** October 24, 2011, 06:39:41 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on October 24, 2011, 06:34:55 PM

Kinda doubt the passing offense has actually improved because of their absence. Maybe in spite of their absence. Brod is a nice possession guy.

well the numbers say you are wrong, but despite that you could be right

jtksu · « **Reply #12 on:** October 24, 2011, 06:45:39 PM »

Curious exactly what numbers say we are better because they haven't played. Kinda strange to think that losing 2 starters would make the wrs better. I'd think it's more a factor of our offense in general improving.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #13 on:** October 24, 2011, 06:49:43 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on October 24, 2011, 06:45:39 PM

Curious exactly what numbers say we are better because they haven't played. Kinda strange to think that losing 2 starters would make the wrs better. I'd think it's more a factor of our offense in general improving.

meh, probably has more to do with how bad TTech and KU are at pass defense than the personnel.

Since Brod and Sheldon have been out we've been completing a higher percent of passes for more yards per completion though.