« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: We should be ranked higher  (Read 1581 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
We should be ranked higher
« on: October 15, 2011, 10:11:42 PM »
yes we should


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Logged

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2011, 10:12:05 PM »
Logged

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2011, 10:12:38 PM »
What did the chingon power rankings say before this game?
Logged

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2011, 10:13:23 PM »
Quote from: hemmy on October 15, 2011, 10:12:38 PM
What did the chingon power rankings say before this game?
we would win
Logged

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM »
we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
Logged

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2011, 10:14:15 PM »
Quote from: fatty fat fat on October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM
we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
should be in the top 12 IMO
Logged

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2011, 10:14:50 PM »
I look at a bunch of rankings and see that we COULD beat every team behind us and a few in front, that's not to say that we would though.  And there is an echelon that we flat out could not compete with.
Logged

Offline TaqMan

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 795
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2011, 10:18:11 PM »
want to be #13 against ku IMO
Logged

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2011, 10:23:24 PM »
I'm completely in favor of the human polls screwing us and keeping us the same.   BCS can put us high though.
Logged
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2011, 10:23:42 PM »
Quote from: Chingon on October 15, 2011, 10:14:15 PM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM
we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
should be in the top 12 IMO

i refuse to hear such nonsense. we suck and have officially run out of schemes. just checked the tank. it's empty fellas and we're miles from the next scheme station. fun run though. we'll always have that.
Logged

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2011, 10:24:49 PM »
Quote from: Chingon on October 15, 2011, 10:14:15 PM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on October 15, 2011, 10:13:49 PM
we should jump nebraska, usc and west virginia.
should be in the top 12 IMO

Illinois
Logged

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2011, 10:25:50 PM »
Is it time to start getting pissed about Wisconsin not having to play anybody and rough ridin' up our national championship hopes yet?
Logged

Offline ksu101

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2011, 10:26:32 PM »
GT, Illinois, Michigan all lost today.   So what does that make it?  10 undefeated teams now?  and WE ARE ONE OF THEM!   :gocho:
Logged

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: We should be ranked higher
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2011, 10:28:36 PM »
Quote from: ksu101 on October 15, 2011, 10:26:32 PM
GT, Illinois, Michigan all lost today.   So what does that make it?  10 undefeated teams now?  and WE ARE ONE OF THEM!   :gocho:

won't matter. chingon chingdex will prob move illinois up to top five. we'll never catch them.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »