« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: The defense was stif-L-ing  (Read 3496 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
The defense was stif-L-ing
« on: September 04, 2011, 12:03:49 AM »
 :lynchmob:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Logged

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29366
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2011, 12:07:47 AM »
don't do this to yourself f^3.  the general vibe was positive though :thumbs:
Logged

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2011, 12:23:40 AM »
Quote from: fatty fat fat on September 04, 2011, 12:03:49 AM
:lynchmob:

When was the last time a K-State D held a team to 129 or less yards and pretty much a shutout?
Logged
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2011, 12:38:27 AM »
Quote from: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2011, 12:23:40 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on September 04, 2011, 12:03:49 AM
:lynchmob:

When was the last time a K-State D held a team to 129 or less yards and pretty much a shutout?

Pretty much a shutout
Logged

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2011, 12:47:43 AM »
Quote from: 06wildcat on September 04, 2011, 12:38:27 AM
Quote from: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2011, 12:23:40 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on September 04, 2011, 12:03:49 AM
:lynchmob:

When was the last time a K-State D held a team to 129 or less yards and pretty much a shutout?

Pretty much a shutout

If you blame the D for the one TD then you have a tremendously LFBIQ. Im giving the offense (specifically B. Brown) all the credit for that one. And btw you're not even being original, you stole that lame ass crap from another thread.  :thumbs:
Logged
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2011, 02:07:03 AM »
Quote from: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2011, 12:47:43 AM
Quote from: 06wildcat on September 04, 2011, 12:38:27 AM
Quote from: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2011, 12:23:40 AM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on September 04, 2011, 12:03:49 AM
:lynchmob:

When was the last time a K-State D held a team to 129 or less yards and pretty much a shutout?

Pretty much a shutout

If you blame the D for the one TD then you have a tremendously LFBIQ. Im giving the offense (specifically B. Brown) all the credit for that one. And btw you're not even being original, you stole that lame ass crap from another thread.  :thumbs:
Bryce Brown = failure  :dubious:
Logged
Quote from: dobber on February 14, 2014, 08:46:32 PM
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline Andy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 872
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2011, 03:39:38 AM »
Would like an honest assessment of the defense.  I wasn't able to see the game, just listened on the radio.  Did they look fundamentally sound?  Tackle well?  Played faster?  Was the D-line actually winning their matchups?

Even last season the defense had a few good games against lower level teams, though statistically this looks pretty impressive.  Someone try to sell me that the defense really will be better...
Logged

Offline opcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 125
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2011, 03:42:16 AM »
Logged
MY NIGGA

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2011, 08:13:38 PM »
Quote from: Andy on September 04, 2011, 03:39:38 AM
Would like an honest assessment of the defense.  I wasn't able to see the game, just listened on the radio.  Did they look fundamentally sound?  Tackle well?  Played faster?  Was the D-line actually winning their matchups?

Even last season the defense had a few good games against lower level teams, though statistically this looks pretty impressive.  Someone try to sell me that the defense really will be better...
Linebackers looked great, they closed in on the ball very well and made good reads. Corners got beat just a few times on the edge, most of their big plays on passes were in the middle of the field. Didn't pay attention to much to the safeties. The D-Line put great pressure on the QB and is much improved from last year. The QB was running for his life the whole game.   :lynchmob:
Logged
Quote from: dobber on February 14, 2014, 08:46:32 PM
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2011, 08:17:11 PM »
I feel like the defense could be much improved. MY NIGGA
Logged

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55963
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2011, 08:23:33 PM »
how steady was the mobbin'? How back is the lynch mob?

Logged

Offline unleashthemob

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 601
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2011, 08:44:44 PM »
pure kool aid boys and girls...#1 this was a div II team missing its #1 QB and star WR #2 last I knew, umm cosh was still at the defensive helm #3 alot of people thought the same thing following ol lazy eye's first game against a lesser offense #4 Sorry folks but there should of been about 5 more sacks or lost for yards plays...more of the same cosh taught arm tackling techniques...ladies and gentlemen did you happen to watch the Baylor/TCU game? This D is not TCU caliber, and we know that our offense isn't going to be able to out score other teams, if I wrong, than let me have some of that purple kool aid, but til then, I'd better stick to the hard crap, because were looking at a long season
Logged

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2011, 08:51:59 PM »
I know it's kool aide, but I need it  :frown:
Logged

Offline opcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 125
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #13 on: September 04, 2011, 08:57:23 PM »
Quote from: unleashthemob on September 04, 2011, 08:44:44 PM
pure kool aid boys and girls...#1 this was a div II team missing its #1 QB and star WR #2 last I knew, umm cosh was still at the defensive helm #3 alot of people thought the same thing following ol lazy eye's first game against a lesser offense #4 Sorry folks but there should of been about 5 more sacks or lost for yards plays...more of the same cosh taught arm tackling techniques...ladies and gentlemen did you happen to watch the Baylor/TCU game? This D is not TCU caliber, and we know that our offense isn't going to be able to out score other teams, if I wrong, than let me have some of that purple kool aid, but til then, I'd better stick to the hard crap, because were looking at a long season

http://www.themercury.com/K-StateSports/article.aspx?articleId=0c71a06feaa4482f95f141171221ff98
« Last Edit: September 04, 2011, 09:00:06 PM by opcat »
Logged
MY NIGGA

Offline fr@ck me

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 480
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2011, 10:40:02 AM »
Quote from: unleashthemob on September 04, 2011, 08:44:44 PM
pure kool aid boys and girls...#1 this was a div II team missing its #1 QB and star WR #2 last I knew, umm cosh was still at the defensive helm #3 alot of people thought the same thing following ol lazy eye's first game against a lesser offense #4 Sorry folks but there should of been about 5 more sacks or lost for yards plays...more of the same cosh taught arm tackling techniques...ladies and gentlemen did you happen to watch the Baylor/TCU game? This D is not TCU caliber, and we know that our offense isn't going to be able to out score other teams, if I wrong, than let me have some of that purple kool aid, but til then, I'd better stick to the hard crap, because were looking at a long season

did not read after this.  VLFBIQ
Logged

Offline unleashthemob

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 601
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2011, 12:08:25 PM »
I'm not into being politically correct to make one feel better...DIV II,  it is what it is dic wad...just like old balls is old balls, nothing warm and fuzzy about that either
« Last Edit: September 05, 2011, 12:13:20 PM by unleashthemob »
Logged

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: The defense was stif-L-ing
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2011, 02:29:27 PM »
what was really sweet about the D in the late 90's....is that Hickson, Murphy, Allen, Scobey.....never sucked enough as RB's to fumble the ball and let the opponent return it to our own 1 yard line..and so our D wouldn't let a directional team score an offensive TD on them.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »