Author Topic: Bowl Projections  (Read 337500 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #275 on: December 07, 2014, 02:08:24 PM »

Kinda dumb that Michigan State got one too. Their best win this season is Nebraska and they got destroyed by the two good teams they played.

That's probably an equally good win as our best win though.

Ehh, I'd still say OU > Nubbs but not by much.

We also have an extra loss.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #276 on: December 07, 2014, 02:10:01 PM »
Yeah, there's no legitimate argument for putting KSU above MSU.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29281
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #277 on: December 07, 2014, 02:12:15 PM »
Yeah, there's no legitimate argument for putting KSU above MSU.

There are some decent ones for putting us above #12 Georgia Tech, though.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #278 on: December 07, 2014, 02:13:20 PM »
Yeah, there's no legitimate argument for putting KSU above MSU.

There are some decent ones for putting us above #12 Georgia Tech, though.

we play in a conference that doesn't have a championship game, Pete.  we wouldn't have "earned" being above GT.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #279 on: December 07, 2014, 02:13:56 PM »
Yeah, there's no legitimate argument for putting KSU above MSU.

There are some decent ones for putting us above #12 Georgia Tech, though.

Not when the Orange Bowl is obligated to take the top ACC non Playoff team.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29281
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #280 on: December 07, 2014, 02:17:35 PM »
Yeah, there's no legitimate argument for putting KSU above MSU.

There are some decent ones for putting us above #12 Georgia Tech, though.

Not when the Orange Bowl is obligated to take the top ACC non Playoff team.

I could be wrong, but I thought that the ACC team had to be ranked at some minimum level to get that.  Is that not correct? 

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #281 on: December 07, 2014, 02:18:48 PM »
Yeah, there's no legitimate argument for putting KSU above MSU.

There are some decent ones for putting us above #12 Georgia Tech, though.

Not when the Orange Bowl is obligated to take the top ACC non Playoff team.

I could be wrong, but I thought that the ACC team had to be ranked at some minimum level to get that.  Is that not correct?

to the best of my knowledge that is not correct.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #282 on: December 07, 2014, 02:21:09 PM »
The Atlantic Coast Conference is locked into a 12 year deal with the Orange Bowl, so if the ACC champion qualifies for the playoffs in a year when the Orange is not a semifinal host, the next-highest ranked ACC team will play in the Orange. If the ACC champ makes an Orange Bowl semifinal, then the league’s No. 2 team heads to an access bowl. For the secondary tie-ins: The Southeastern Conference and the Big Ten Conference are guaranteed three appearances each, and the University of Notre Dame can play in a maximum of two games, but is not guaranteed any appearances. The ACC team's opponent in a given year will be the highest-ranked available team from the SEC, big 10 (this always excludes the SEC and Big Ten champions. If an SEC or Big Ten team—or teams—qualify for the College Football Playoff, the next available team would also be excluded from participating in the Orange Bowl due to contractual obligations with the Sugar and Rose Bowls, respectively), and Notre Dame, subject to these constraints. Also, should this highest-ranked team create a rematch with the ACC team, the Orange Bowl has the option of passing over that team for the next-highest ranked team among the big 10, SEC, and Notre Dame, again subject to the above contractual constraints. The College Football Playoff committee's rankings will be used to select the ACC's opponent. The other four will be College Football Playoff berths. Also ESPN holds the television rights for the next 12 years as well

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #283 on: December 07, 2014, 02:28:55 PM »
Kinda becoming numb to how lame the organization of college football is. I don't have it in me to be upset

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #284 on: December 07, 2014, 02:38:13 PM »
I'm pretty excited for the Alamo Bowl though guys. Good date, pud opponent, etc.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #285 on: December 07, 2014, 02:38:56 PM »
We're staring a top 10 ranking square in the face is what I'm saying

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #286 on: December 07, 2014, 02:40:17 PM »
I'm excited too SD.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #287 on: December 07, 2014, 02:40:32 PM »
We're staring a top 10 ranking square in the face is what I'm saying

this

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #288 on: December 07, 2014, 02:40:45 PM »
ucla is ok fun, but maryland would have been better.  i don't like how the same conferences always have to play the same conferences.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #289 on: December 07, 2014, 02:42:56 PM »
ucla could easily beat us.  they have way better players than we do.  like, way way better.  like, it's not even funny how much more talented they are than we are.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #290 on: December 07, 2014, 02:44:31 PM »
ucla is ok fun, but maryland would have been better.  i don't like how the same conferences always have to play the same conferences.
Bowl lottery to pick teams? They can bid for the number of balls they want in the lottery?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Bowl Projections
« Reply #291 on: December 07, 2014, 02:44:48 PM »
Yeah but they are pretty sucky anyway kim carnes

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #292 on: December 07, 2014, 02:47:05 PM »
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #293 on: December 07, 2014, 02:47:32 PM »
I wish we could just play them at their place. My god there is no better campus on planet earth

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #294 on: December 07, 2014, 02:48:40 PM »
Bowl lottery to pick teams?

i'd like that.
I would to. Would add more excitement to the season. Bama playing tOSU in the famous Idaho Potato bowl. 1 in 30 years would be amazing.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51509
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #295 on: December 07, 2014, 02:48:56 PM »
They stink and their coach will probably be leaving

Offline manpow5

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #296 on: December 07, 2014, 02:54:14 PM »
Its official. Alamo bowl with Arizona


To EMAW or Not to EMAW

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #297 on: December 07, 2014, 02:58:00 PM »
Its official. Alamo bowl with Arizona

Arizona is cheating somehow
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #298 on: December 07, 2014, 03:01:27 PM »
Its official. Alamo bowl with Arizona

Arizona is cheating somehow

Trying to double their $

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Bowl Projections
« Reply #299 on: December 07, 2014, 03:02:02 PM »
so it will be Alamo Bowl then

not bad