Unanswered Questions

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I asked these questions a while ago.  Nobody ever tried to answer them.  I am now more curious than ever.

Open questions to Booktard and other Neo-Socialists (i.e., Libs):

How does the raising tax rates help the economy?  Conversely, exactly how does lower tax rates hurt the economy (pls avoid inserting charts purporting a correlation without connection, I make a graph showing a direct correlation between a shitty economy and Butler in the Final 4, but that's obviously nonsense)?

Do you understand that the Bush tax cuts, cut tax rates in all brackets?

Do you know that after tax rates were reduced on the highest brackets (2003) that federal income tax revenues increased rapidly?

Do you think raising the highest marginal  tax rate will help those who don't pay taxes in that bracket, if so how?

Do you think the federal government can only spend what it takes in in revenues?

What Federal Govt. services does the "middle class" currently receive?  Which services would be added or improved if rates were raised?

What exactly does the Federal Govt do well?  What parts of the economy would you prefer under government control?

Obama and others have said small businesses are the "engine of job growth" in this country, why do you always complain about corporations not hiring people if all politicians acknowledge this is not the source of job growth?

Can you actually articulate your argument, or are you limited to the talking points repeated ad nauseum by Bookcat, edn, BMW, and to a lesser extent 06, and cire?

Do you have a point, or do you just hate people more successful than you

[06wildcat]

I asked these questions a while ago.  Nobody ever tried to answer them.  I am now more curious than ever.

Open questions to Booktard and other Neo-Socialists (i.e., Libs):

How does the raising tax rates help the economy?  Conversely, exactly how does lower tax rates hurt the economy (pls avoid inserting charts purporting a correlation without connection, I make a graph showing a direct correlation between a shitty economy and Butler in the Final 4, but that's obviously nonsense)?

Do you understand that the Bush tax cuts, cut tax rates in all brackets?

Do you know that after tax rates were reduced on the highest brackets (2003) that federal income tax revenues increased rapidly?

Do you think raising the highest marginal  tax rate will help those who don't pay taxes in that bracket, if so how?

Do you think the federal government can only spend what it takes in in revenues?

What Federal Govt. services does the "middle class" currently receive?  Which services would be added or improved if rates were raised?

What exactly does the Federal Govt do well?  What parts of the economy would you prefer under government control?

Obama and others have said small businesses are the "engine of job growth" in this country, why do you always complain about corporations not hiring people if all politicians acknowledge this is not the source of job growth?

Can you actually articulate your argument, or are you limited to the talking points repeated ad nauseum by Bookcat, edn, BMW, and to a lesser extent 06, and cire?

Do you have a point, or do you just hate people more successful than you

 

[Testy Westy]

[hemmy]

2. Did Jews really do WTC?

[husserl]

(pls avoid...purporting a correlation without connection, I make a graph showing a direct correlation between a crapty economy and Butler in the Final 4, but that's obviously nonsense)

...

Do you know that after tax rates were reduced on the highest brackets (2003) that federal income tax revenues increased rapidly?

[pike]

2. Did Jews really do WTC?

No. The military industrial complex did.

[michigancat]

[fatty fat fat]

the real world isn't a computer game, moron.

there is more to the economy than simply monetary efficiency.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

PATHETIC

It's not a trap you wieners, these are easy questions, some of them "yes" or "no".  I am just trying to understand your unsubstantiated talking points.  I really want to know if you actually believe them, have ever bother to verified their veracity, or if you're just a bunch of liars and/or fools. 

Without any answer, I guess we'll just have to chalk this up as another example of a bunch of anti-intellectual liberals that hate facts.  No surprises here.

 

[fatty fat fat]

PATHETIC

It's not a trap you wieners, these are easy questions, some of them "yes" or "no".  I am just trying to understand your unsubstantiated talking points.  I really want to know if you actually believe them, have ever bother to verified their veracity, or if you're just a bunch of liars and/or fools. 

Without any answer, I guess we'll just have to chalk this up as another example of a bunch of anti-intellectual liberals that hate facts.  No surprises here.

 

What on earth? Did you not see my post?

Do you have a point, or do you just hate people more successful than you

what an idiotic statement.  No one here likes you, and that's saying something considering this is a very tight community.

[michigancat]

IT'S NOT A TRAP YOU WIENERS

[OK_Cat]

r's, d's, tp's, they are all complete morons.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

PATHETIC

It's not a trap you wieners, these are easy questions, some of them "yes" or "no".  I am just trying to understand your unsubstantiated talking points.  I really want to know if you actually believe them, have ever bother to verified their veracity, or if you're just a bunch of liars and/or fools. 

Without any answer, I guess we'll just have to chalk this up as another example of a bunch of anti-intellectual liberals that hate facts.  No surprises here.

 

What on earth? Did you not see my post?

Do you have a point, or do you just hate people more successful than you

what an idiotic statement.  No one here likes you, and that's saying something considering this is a very tight community.

Sorry, I still don't follow your video game analogy.  Perhaps some context to the "unanswered questions":  they came up in response to the wild and unsubstantiated talking points of the libs on this board as they apply to the fiscal and economic problems this country faces. 

Nice personal attack though.  PATHETIC

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

 

[ednksu]

I didn't see me on the hit and run list my first read through!!! 

[ednksu]

Do you know that after tax rates were reduced on the highest brackets (2003) that federal income tax revenues increased rapidly?

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=200

2003 eh?

[Dingo]

Holy crap!  Questions we can't answer without exposing ourselves as uninformed drones who dream of suckling at the Obama teat!  How will we answer?  How will we answer?  Quick!  Feed those questions into the liberal computer ...  AH!  Here come the answers now:

1)  Make a stupid analogy that makes no sense.
2)  Make ad hominem attacks.
3)  Tell the questioner he is wrong without telling him why.
4)  Insert 

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Holy crap!  Questions we can't answer without exposing ourselves as uninformed drones who dream of suckling at the Obama teat!  How will we answer?  How will we answer?  Quick!  Feed those questions into the liberal computer ...  AH!  Here come the answers now:

1)  Make a stupid analogy that makes no sense.
2)  Make ad hominem attacks.
3)  Tell the questioner he is wrong without telling him why.
4)  Insert 

[ednksu]

thats right just ignore evidence to the contrary. 

Thanks to for hijacking my party assholes.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

P
A
T
H
E
T
I
C

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

 

[0.42]

 

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

 

[Rams]

(pls avoid...purporting a correlation without connection, I make a graph showing a direct correlation between a crapty economy and Butler in the Final 4, but that's obviously nonsense)

...

Do you know that after tax rates were reduced on the highest brackets (2003) that federal income tax revenues increased rapidly?

This pretty much sums up all right wing economic viewpoints.  They understand the "post hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy, yet they completely refuse to believe that it can apply to their theories.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

(pls avoid...purporting a correlation without connection, I make a graph showing a direct correlation between a crapty economy and Butler in the Final 4, but that's obviously nonsense)

...

Do you know that after tax rates were reduced on the highest brackets (2003) that federal income tax revenues increased rapidly?

This pretty much sums up all right wing economic viewpoints.  They understand the "post hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy, yet they completely refuse to believe that it can apply to their theories.

It's not a theory it's a fact.  Any jerkoff can look it up. 

I ask the question b/c the libs on this board frequently claim that the bush tax cuts caused/continue to cause the deficit.  Yet after those tax cuts, revenues rose, and continued to rise to all time highs. 

I shouldn't have to hold hands like this.  The dearth of intelligence on this board is deflating.  Pretty standard fair for the anti-intellectual left.

PATHETIC