0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: OregonHawk on July 12, 2011, 09:35:59 PMSerious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit? Two years ago. He was a big-time dunker too. Shows you how relevant that is to being a big-time player.
Serious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit?
Quote from: OregonHawk on July 12, 2011, 09:35:59 PMSerious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit? Dude. You are getting pounded. Just quit on this one.
Quote from: Limestone on July 13, 2011, 08:51:07 AMQuote from: OregonHawk on July 12, 2011, 09:35:59 PMSerious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit? Dude. You are getting pounded. Just quit on this one.Get to work on that top 10 Cubans of 2011 list. TIA.
Quote from: skycat on July 12, 2011, 11:18:03 PMQuote from: OregonHawk on July 12, 2011, 09:35:59 PMSerious question: when was the last time K-State signed a top 35 recruit? Two years ago. He was a big-time dunker too. Shows you how relevant that is to being a big-time player.Shows you what happens to highly ranked prospects when they commit to K-State. No wonder your coaching staff had to cancel their elite camp.
Shows you what happens to highly ranked prospects when they commit to K-State.
Quote from: OregonHawk on July 13, 2011, 04:55:59 PMShows you what happens to highly ranked prospects when they commit to K-State.
Kansas: Four lottery picks in two yearsK-State: Nothing
Quote from: OregonHawk on July 14, 2011, 08:44:48 AMKansas: Four lottery picks in two yearsK-State: Nothing Why don't you just edit your posts rather than deleting and having to retype the whole thing for minor modifications?
12-1 has got Ben reeling. Meanwhile Cats fans are partying like Hope and Abbie.
Even a time machine can't "win the north!"
Quote from: Trim on July 14, 2011, 08:49:39 AMQuote from: OregonHawk on July 14, 2011, 08:44:48 AMKansas: Four lottery picks in two yearsK-State: Nothing Why don't you just edit your posts rather than deleting and having to retype the whole thing for minor modifications?
Quote from: Limestone on July 14, 2011, 10:09:20 AMEven a time machine can't "win the north!"Neither can K-State.
Quote from: OregonHawk on July 14, 2011, 10:51:51 AMQuote from: Limestone on July 14, 2011, 10:09:20 AMEven a time machine can't "win the north!"Neither can K-State.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game3 North titles vs. 0, you're really killing it today dumbass
Quote from: bigwillie20 on July 14, 2011, 11:03:55 AMQuote from: OregonHawk on July 14, 2011, 10:51:51 AMQuote from: Limestone on July 14, 2011, 10:09:20 AMEven a time machine can't "win the north!"Neither can K-State.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game3 North titles vs. 0, you're really killing it today dumbass Yes, I realize that K-State had a nice little ten year stretch in football where you guys didn't suck total balls. Still, that doesn't change the fact that K-State hasn't even come close to winning the North, or a bowl game for that matter, in almost a decade.
Quote from: OregonHawk on July 14, 2011, 01:17:03 PMQuote from: bigwillie20 on July 14, 2011, 11:03:55 AMQuote from: OregonHawk on July 14, 2011, 10:51:51 AMQuote from: Limestone on July 14, 2011, 10:09:20 AMEven a time machine can't "win the north!"Neither can K-State.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_12_Football_Championship_Game3 North titles vs. 0, you're really killing it today dumbass Yes, I realize that K-State had a nice little ten year stretch in football where you guys didn't suck total balls. Still, that doesn't change the fact that K-State hasn't even come close to winning the North, or a bowl game for that matter, in almost a decade. If we would have beat Nebraska in 2009 we would have won the north.
If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.
I kinda feel bad for beems in this thread