Coaching Carousel Master Thread (MAYBE FEATURING THE KSU CATS?)

[Clevey 2 Times]

Going to be a weird moment when GTown has to fire Ewing.

On the oscar/Jank conversation...oscar does have more of a track record. I'm curious to see what the changes in Columbia do to oscar's ability to pull Saint Louis kids. If he starts losing out there, I'm not sure how he replaces it, like what would be the next, natural location with equivalent talent that oscar could realistically tap into?

[Joker]

Tourney appearances:

oscar = 11
Jank   =  1

And I hate defending oscar.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Going to be a weird moment when GTown has to fire Ewing.

On the oscar/Jank conversation...oscar does have more of a track record. I'm curious to see what the changes in Columbia do to oscar's ability to pull Saint Louis kids. If he starts losing out there, I'm not sure how he replaces it, like what would be the next, natural location with equivalent talent that oscar could realistically tap into?

I think Ewing will be great there.

[Kat Kid]

lots of Jank hate. He has had a series of garbage jobs, now has a good one and has won.

Jank already has a top 150 4* PG coming in next year and is recruiting at a much higher level than oscar.

[Rage Against the McKee]

If we find ourselves seriously considering Jank, we should probably give McDermott a call. He'd probably take the job and be better than Jank.

[Clevey 2 Times]

lots of Jank hate. He has had a series of garbage jobs, now has a good one and has won.

Jank already has a top 150 4* PG coming in next year and is recruiting at a much higher level than oscar.

If Jank keeps getting this kind of talent at SMU, I'd make a play on him if oscar continues to struggle in the postseason.

[pissclams]

Jank already has a top 150 4* PG coming in next year and is recruiting at a much higher level than oscar.

that sample size is humongous!

[420seriouscat69]

Jank already has a top 150 4* PG coming in next year and is recruiting at a much higher level than oscar.

that sample size is humongous!

KK realizes oscar has brought in more 4 star recruits and has a way better HC recording, right?

[TownieCat]

I saw enough in the 2nd half of the SMU/USC game to know that I never want Jank to be the head basketball coach at K-State under any circumstances.

[Kat Kid]

Jank already has a top 150 4* PG coming in next year and is recruiting at a much higher level than oscar.

that sample size is humongous!

no, but we could lend more weight to comparing what they are both doing now, as opposed to 12 years ago.

[pissclams]

counterpoint to your counterpoint:  did isn't doing
until ol' janky boy fires up the 4* recruiting machine at smu, i'm not going to give him the recruiting nod over ol brucey boy

the problem with ol' brucey boy isn't his level of recruiting.  a good coach can win an above average number of games with the level of players ol' brucey boy brings to manhattan.

[wetwillie]

kat kid has serious conflicts of interest on this. He can't be objective. Let's all move on.

[sys]

he's like jank's cousin or something, right?  something like that.  he should be ignored on this issue.

[Gooch]

KK is probably deeply entangled in the Jank "Deep State". #sad

[star seed 7]

It all makes so much sense now

[Kat Kid]

you all are libtards

[pissclams]

you all are libtards

you're a slippery son of a bitch, kat kid

[MakeItRain]

oscar is better than Jank. If we fire oscar, we probably should hire somebody who might actually do a better job than him.

What evidence do you have to support this claim?

oscar did a better job at Southern Illinois than Jank has done anywhere. He also did a lot better with rosters much better than he would ever be able to recruit himself than Jank did at SMU this year.

GTFO.

There's no need arguing the merits of Jank on here. Along the way someone joked about him then some people just set their opinions at that.

[pvegs]

oscar is better than Jank. If we fire oscar, we probably should hire somebody who might actually do a better job than him.

What evidence do you have to support this claim?

oscar did a better job at Southern Illinois than Jank has done anywhere. He also did a lot better with rosters much better than he would ever be able to recruit himself than Jank did at SMU this year.

GTFO.

There's no need arguing the merits of Jank on here. Along the way someone joked about him then some people just set their opinions at that.

i ask this in all honesty, but so you think jank would be good? like, no foolies? or just that there's a dumb narrative on here that he would suck based on zero evidence bc goEMAW?

[MakeItRain]

oscar is better than Jank. If we fire oscar, we probably should hire somebody who might actually do a better job than him.

What evidence do you have to support this claim?

oscar did a better job at Southern Illinois than Jank has done anywhere. He also did a lot better with rosters much better than he would ever be able to recruit himself than Jank did at SMU this year.

GTFO.

There's no need arguing the merits of Jank on here. Along the way someone joked about him then some people just set their opinions at that.

i ask this in all honesty, but so you think jank would be good? like, no foolies? or just that there's a dumb narrative on here that he would suck based on zero evidence bc goEMAW?

I have no idea if he would be good, that's hardly the point.

[pissclams]

I have to ask, what was your point?

[MakeItRain]

I have to ask, what was your point?

There's no evidence of Jank being horrible but for some reason a component of this board seems to think that he is. None of it is actually based on what he has or hasn't accomplished so it's just noise.

[Rage Against the McKee]

I have to ask, what was your point?

There's no evidence of Jank being horrible but for some reason a component of this board seems to think that he is. None of it is actually based on what he has or hasn't accomplished so it's just noise.

I don't know that he's horrible, but he certainly appears worse than oscar on paper.

[MakeItRain]

I have to ask, what was your point?

There's no evidence of Jank being horrible but for some reason a component of this board seems to think that he is. None of it is actually based on what he has or hasn't accomplished so it's just noise.

I don't know that he's horrible, but he certainly appears worse than oscar on paper.

Really? How so?

[pissclams]

I have to ask, what was your point?

There's no evidence of Jank being horrible but for some reason a component of this board seems to think that he is. None of it is actually based on what he has or hasn't accomplished so it's just noise.

i mean, that's what this board is.  we spend our time debating things we know little about.