Author Topic: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA  (Read 8787 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #25 on: March 26, 2011, 08:01:49 PM »
withey is awful, I hope for EMAJ sakes he isn't a starter next season

He regressed under Manning/Self

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #26 on: March 26, 2011, 08:10:10 PM »
yeah. Selby isn't going anywhere.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #27 on: March 26, 2011, 08:14:04 PM »
otto porter?  that anderson is gone, ku had a pretty good shot at him, right?

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #28 on: March 26, 2011, 08:41:44 PM »
yeah. Selby isn't going anywhere.

Self basically red shirted him this year. Sad really....considering if Massa let him play to his potential he would be making 6 figures next season.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #29 on: March 26, 2011, 08:49:42 PM »
Quote
otto porter?  that anderson is gone, ku had a pretty good shot at him, right?

Calipari's to loss once he starts reeling in his next freshman class.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #30 on: March 26, 2011, 08:51:05 PM »
JW would be fine if he got an opportunity.  Seff doesn't NEED him/Won't use him.

Offline Rams

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3384
  • Worst poster on this board by far
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #31 on: March 26, 2011, 09:09:54 PM »
yeah. Selby isn't going anywhere.
I've still seen him in the first round on some mocks.  You better believe that a kid that basically had an agent coming out of HS is gonna jump as soon as he sees $.

Not that I give a crap, but I'd bet money he's gone.
"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #32 on: March 26, 2011, 09:17:01 PM »
I don't see any way that Selby is gone.  The vast majority of sites don't even list him in this year's mock drafts.  pretty sad how Self transformed him from the next John Wall/Derrick Rose into Morningwood's back-up.

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #33 on: March 26, 2011, 09:31:47 PM »
I thought I saw somewhere that a source already said Selby was coming back.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #34 on: March 27, 2011, 12:35:47 PM »
If they lose Trob, and the mcmorris's, they're going to suck next year.  Bill Self completely forgot to recruit front court players for next season and there isn't crap left to take.  They're going to have like 6 open 'ships and a couple guys to take them.  Large JuCo class on its way . . .



they wouldn't suck, you dumbass.  you don't need bigs to be good in college bball.  they'd still have talented, experienced guards which is more than enough.

lol, great post.  Those "talented" guards don't rely on post play at all to get looks because they're so good off the dribble, lol.

They probably don't even need a male strength and conditioning coach either, lol
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10152
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #35 on: March 27, 2011, 12:51:30 PM »
When was the last time the rivals overall #1 didn't go after one season? Has it ever happened?  Bill Self making history.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #36 on: March 27, 2011, 01:14:20 PM »
When was the last time the rivals overall #1 didn't go after one season? Has it ever happened?  Bill Self making history.

From 2003 forward every #1 rivals player has either entered the draft from high school or left after their first year. This would be some of Massa's finest material.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #37 on: March 27, 2011, 01:55:14 PM »
otto porter?  that anderson is gone, ku had a pretty good shot at him, right?

the porters seem to be an odd bunch.  my guess is that the new order would be mu, gtown, arkansas, ku, anyone new.  but they don't say anything, so it's just regurgitating what others have read in the tea leaves.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #38 on: March 27, 2011, 01:57:58 PM »
otto porter?  that anderson is gone, ku had a pretty good shot at him, right?

the porters seem to be an odd bunch.  my guess is that the new order would be mu, gtown, arkansas, ku, anyone new.  but they don't say anything, so it's just regurgitating what others have read in the tea leaves.

810 was saying last week that his fam is heavy on KU, but that Otto is heavy on MU, but supposedly, that was before all the Anderson stuff.  Would bet that he follows mike to Ark at this point.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #39 on: March 27, 2011, 02:00:36 PM »
otto porter?  that anderson is gone, ku had a pretty good shot at him, right?

the porters seem to be an odd bunch.  my guess is that the new order would be mu, gtown, arkansas, ku, anyone new.  but they don't say anything, so it's just regurgitating what others have read in the tea leaves.

810 was saying last week that his fam is heavy on KU, but that Otto is heavy on MU, but supposedly, that was before all the Anderson stuff.  Would bet that he follows mike to Ark at this point.

I bet Otto's mother loved MA.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #40 on: March 27, 2011, 02:04:20 PM »
810 was saying last week that his fam is heavy on KU, but that Otto is heavy on MU.

don't know who said that, or the basis, but it doesn't match up with what is available on the internet about the porters' inclinations.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #41 on: March 27, 2011, 02:13:59 PM »
lol, great post.  Those "talented" guards don't rely on post play at all to get looks because they're so good off the dribble, lol.

there isn't another big 12 team that would even come close to having equivalent talent (and experience) as taylor, selby, johnson, releford & the new pg.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #42 on: March 27, 2011, 02:20:38 PM »
810 was saying last week that his fam is heavy on KU, but that Otto is heavy on MU.

don't know who said that, or the basis, but it doesn't match up with what is available on the internet about the porters' inclinations.

It was BITB during one of his rants against MA when this was all at it's climax.  No real source, just BITB talking

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #43 on: March 27, 2011, 02:51:17 PM »
lol, great post.  Those "talented" guards don't rely on post play at all to get looks because they're so good off the dribble, lol.

there isn't another big 12 team that would even come close to having equivalent talent (and experience) as taylor, selby, johnson, releford & the new pg.
Jcovan and canadians :ck:

Offline Rams

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3384
  • Worst poster on this board by far
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #44 on: March 27, 2011, 03:26:05 PM »
810 was saying last week that his fam is heavy on KU, but that Otto is heavy on MU.

don't know who said that, or the basis, but it doesn't match up with what is available on the internet about the porters' inclinations.

It was BITB during one of his rants against MA when this was all at it's climax.  No real source, just BITB talking

Redundancy

"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #45 on: March 27, 2011, 03:37:22 PM »
Jcovan and canadians :ck:

if you include ut's incoming freshmen, they're pretty equal on talent, but not on experience.

"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: t-rob & t-thomps to NBA
« Reply #46 on: March 28, 2011, 06:50:57 AM »
Selby won't go.  Robinson might.  I think the morrises are 50/50, and they are probably Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) enough to not go this year.