Author Topic: MU Game (Read 5568 times)

steve dave · « **on:** February 24, 2011, 06:43:01 PM »

I'm terrified that kenpom only has us as 56% chance of winning

kstater · « **Reply #1 on:** February 24, 2011, 06:44:35 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 06:43:01 PM

I'm terrified that kenpom only has us as 56% chance of winning

He only had us with a 37 percent chance at Nebraska right?

pike · « **Reply #2 on:** February 24, 2011, 06:44:47 PM »

0.42 · « **Reply #3 on:** February 24, 2011, 06:50:41 PM »

SUPER
BOWL
NUMBER
FOUR

Stupid Fitz · « **Reply #4 on:** February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM »

If we win this one, we are in.

steve dave · « **Reply #5 on:** February 24, 2011, 07:35:50 PM »

Quote from: Stupid Fitz on February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM

If we win this one, we are in.

we are in anyway, but more importantly we have hope for no wednesday game of shame

wes mantooth · « **Reply #6 on:** February 24, 2011, 07:41:00 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 07:35:50 PM

Quote from: Stupid Fitz on February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM
If we win this one, we are in.

we are in anyway, but more importantly we are have hope for no wednesday game of shame

if we win, and mizzou and cats finish 9-7, what is the next tie breaker?

Stupid Fitz · « **Reply #7 on:** February 24, 2011, 07:46:35 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 07:35:50 PM

Quote from: Stupid Fitz on February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM
If we win this one, we are in.

we are in anyway, but more importantly we are have hope for no wednesday game of shame

I know, I just wanted to keep the trend going.

steve dave · « **Reply #8 on:** February 24, 2011, 07:53:03 PM »

Quote from: wes mantooth on February 24, 2011, 07:41:00 PM

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 07:35:50 PM
Quote from: Stupid Fitz on February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM
If we win this one, we are in.

we are in anyway, but more importantly we are have hope for no wednesday game of shame

if we win, and mizzou and cats finish 9-7, what is the next tie breaker?

we need KU to beat MU

pike · « **Reply #9 on:** February 24, 2011, 07:53:35 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 07:35:50 PM

Quote from: Stupid Fitz on February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM
If we win this one, we are in.

we are in anyway, but more importantly we are have hope for no wednesday game of shame

Can't even remember the last time we played on a Wednesday in the Big 12's. Must have been 06?

RonLongshaft · « **Reply #10 on:** February 24, 2011, 08:01:12 PM »

Quote from: wes mantooth on February 24, 2011, 07:41:00 PM

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 07:35:50 PM
Quote from: Stupid Fitz on February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM
If we win this one, we are in.

we are in anyway, but more importantly we are have hope for no wednesday game of shame

if we win, and mizzou and cats finish 9-7, what is the next tie breaker?

Head to head record = split
then
record against your "division" right?

EllToPay · « **Reply #11 on:** February 24, 2011, 08:39:03 PM »

sd, BITB and you differ greatly on tiebreaker scenarios.

nicname · « **Reply #12 on:** February 24, 2011, 08:45:12 PM »

Though kenpom takes account for home court advantage, I don't think his formulas account for the severe drop-off that a team like MU has away from home. Plus, MU's style leads to inflated numbers against inferior opponents. They are one of the few teams, because of their style of play, that kenpom really doesn't gauge as well as it should.

KSU rolls in this one 80-65 or somewhere in that range.

sys · « **Reply #13 on:** February 24, 2011, 09:10:13 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 06:43:01 PM

I'm terrified that kenpom only has us as 56% chance of winning

show ol' kenny the winn big 12 home/road splits and watch him shut his fat face the eff up.

JavaCat · « **Reply #14 on:** February 24, 2011, 09:32:54 PM »

Quote from: RonLongshaft on February 24, 2011, 08:01:12 PM

Quote from: wes mantooth on February 24, 2011, 07:41:00 PM
Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 07:35:50 PM
Quote from: Stupid Fitz on February 24, 2011, 07:32:03 PM
If we win this one, we are in.

we are in anyway, but more importantly we are have hope for no wednesday game of shame

if we win, and mizzou and cats finish 9-7, what is the next tie breaker?

Head to head record = split
then
record against your "division" right?

Yes, record against the "division" is the next tiebreaker. KSU would be 6-4 against the division. If MU were to beat NU we'd need them to lose to KU. Of course, if NU, CU or BU win out there could be a three way tie.

CatsFan_58 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 24, 2011, 11:31:02 PM »

Quote from: nicname on February 24, 2011, 08:45:12 PM

KSU rolls in this one 80-65 or somewhere in that range.

steve dave · « **Reply #16 on:** February 25, 2011, 08:11:38 AM »

Quote from: EllToPay on February 24, 2011, 08:39:03 PM

sd, BITB and you differ greatly on tiebreaker scenarios.

because he's a dumbass and I'm very smart

EllToPay · « **Reply #17 on:** February 25, 2011, 08:25:01 AM »

Quote from: steve dave on February 25, 2011, 08:11:38 AM

Quote from: EllToPay on February 24, 2011, 08:39:03 PM
sd, BITB and you differ greatly on tiebreaker scenarios.

because he's a dumbass and I'm very smart

Quote

kkwhb kevin kietzman
If ksu beats mu, cats hold 9-7 tiebreakers. MU holds 10-6 tiebreaker. These are for 4th seed in 2 team ties.
20 hours ago Favorite Retweet Reply

WHO TO BELIEVE?!

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #18 on:** February 25, 2011, 08:27:11 AM »

Was trying to find some info on the Cat Baseball game and stumbled across this little gem. Was lolling at this Catman30 dude. Can't tell if he's serious or a total tool. Thought I'd share.

http://kansasstate.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=10&tid=142667837&mid=142667837&sid=889&style=2

Quote

Well I'll probably only have a 12 pack before the game so there won't be any throwing up. As for the pissing during the game, dude, I've got a adult diaper already packed. I'm going to keep filling it up during the game and then after I'm going to wing it at the missou bus as they pull away.........its the least I could do....

Sounds like a real gameday warrior, would be awesome, but mostly embarrassing if he actually hurled a bag of piss at the MU bus

mocat · « **Reply #19 on:** February 25, 2011, 08:33:19 AM »

Quote from: nicname on February 24, 2011, 08:45:12 PM

Though kenpom takes account for home court advantage, I don't think his formulas account for the severe drop-off that a team like MU has away from home. Plus, MU's style leads to inflated numbers against inferior opponents. They are one of the few teams, because of their style of play, that kenpom really doesn't gauge as well as it should.

KSU rolls in this one 80-65 or somewhere in that range.

Mizzou games in the FM era:

in the 4 meetings in Columbia, cats are 0-4 with an avg margin of -11.3 pts
in the 3 meetings in Manhattan, cats are 3-0 with an avg margin of 21.0 pts

not to worry bros

catzacker · « **Reply #20 on:** February 25, 2011, 08:51:30 AM »

Quote from: sys on February 24, 2011, 09:10:13 PM

Quote from: steve dave on February 24, 2011, 06:43:01 PM
I'm terrified that kenpom only has us as 56% chance of winning

show ol' kenny the winn big 12 home/road splits and watch him shut his fat face the eff up.

do not anger ken.

JavaCat · « **Reply #21 on:** February 25, 2011, 09:47:43 AM »

Quote from: EllToPay on February 25, 2011, 08:25:01 AM

Quote from: steve dave on February 25, 2011, 08:11:38 AM
Quote from: EllToPay on February 24, 2011, 08:39:03 PM
sd, BITB and you differ greatly on tiebreaker scenarios.

because he's a dumbass and I'm very smart

Quote
kkwhb kevin kietzman
If ksu beats mu, cats hold 9-7 tiebreakers. MU holds 10-6 tiebreaker. These are for 4th seed in 2 team ties.
20 hours ago Favorite Retweet Reply

WHO TO BELIEVE?!

Not necessarily. MU could finish 9-7 by losing to KSU and NU and beating KU. Assuming KSU is 9-7 as well, we need to cheer hard for Doc as we'd need NU to finish ahead of CU. Losing twice to CU could really sting.

steve dave · « **Reply #22 on:** February 25, 2011, 10:31:05 AM »

Quote from: JavaCat on February 25, 2011, 09:47:43 AM

Quote from: EllToPay on February 25, 2011, 08:25:01 AM
Quote from: steve dave on February 25, 2011, 08:11:38 AM
Quote from: EllToPay on February 24, 2011, 08:39:03 PM
sd, BITB and you differ greatly on tiebreaker scenarios.

because he's a dumbass and I'm very smart

Quote
kkwhb kevin kietzman
If ksu beats mu, cats hold 9-7 tiebreakers. MU holds 10-6 tiebreaker. These are for 4th seed in 2 team ties.
20 hours ago Favorite Retweet Reply

WHO TO BELIEVE?!

Not necessarily. MU could finish 9-7 by losing to KSU and NU and beating KU. Assuming KSU is 9-7 as well, we need to cheer hard for Doc as we'd need NU to finish ahead of CU. Losing twice to CU could really sting.

Yep, that or KU beats MU and then it won't matter as we would have the tie break against the #1 north team should we both end 9-7 and both have 6 north wins.

CNS · « **Reply #23 on:** February 25, 2011, 10:42:54 AM »

KenPom was on with Nick Wright yesterday. Sounded surprisingly normal.

I was expecting him to sound like the kid with glasses on Role Models.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #24 on:** February 25, 2011, 10:44:10 AM »

Quote from: CNS Casey on February 25, 2011, 10:42:54 AM

KenPom was on with Nick Wright yesterday. Sounded surprisingly normal.

I was expecting him to sound like the kid with glasses on Role Models.

Well...

Author Topic: MU Game (Read 5568 times)

catzacker