0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
I still can't believe that the WSC cost 85 million.
Quote from: eastcat on June 07, 2016, 06:18:18 PMI still can't believe that the WSC cost 85 million.Like, as in that's super cheap, or that's outrageously expensive?
Quote from: KCFDcat on June 07, 2016, 06:41:00 PMQuote from: eastcat on June 07, 2016, 06:18:18 PMI still can't believe that the WSC cost 85 million.Like, as in that's super cheap, or that's outrageously expensive?Expensive. Baylors entire stadium cost 260m. 3x WSC.
Yeah, I seriously don't think we got a good value at all.
Quote from: eastcat on June 08, 2016, 03:00:04 PMQuote from: KCFDcat on June 07, 2016, 06:41:00 PMQuote from: eastcat on June 07, 2016, 06:18:18 PMI still can't believe that the WSC cost 85 million.Like, as in that's super cheap, or that's outrageously expensive?Expensive. Baylors entire stadium cost 260m. 3x WSC.One thing to keep in mind is that we paid for not just the structure, but for the tear down and rebuild in one offseason. The timeline was very tight and we paid a premium for that. If we had the luxury of playing somewhere else for two or three years, I imagine the price of WSC (and VFC, for that matter) would have been less.
Quote from: CyberToothCat on June 08, 2016, 07:18:24 PMQuote from: eastcat on June 08, 2016, 03:00:04 PMQuote from: KCFDcat on June 07, 2016, 06:41:00 PMQuote from: eastcat on June 07, 2016, 06:18:18 PMI still can't believe that the WSC cost 85 million.Like, as in that's super cheap, or that's outrageously expensive?Expensive. Baylors entire stadium cost 260m. 3x WSC.One thing to keep in mind is that we paid for not just the structure, but for the tear down and rebuild in one offseason. The timeline was very tight and we paid a premium for that. If we had the luxury of playing somewhere else for two or three years, I imagine the price of WSC (and VFC, for that matter) would have been less.Yes, we paid a lot of money for something you can't actually see, that's why it seems like we got poor value.
Quote from: kim carnes on June 09, 2016, 10:13:42 AMQuote from: CyberToothCat on June 08, 2016, 07:18:24 PMQuote from: eastcat on June 08, 2016, 03:00:04 PMQuote from: KCFDcat on June 07, 2016, 06:41:00 PMQuote from: eastcat on June 07, 2016, 06:18:18 PMI still can't believe that the WSC cost 85 million.Like, as in that's super cheap, or that's outrageously expensive?Expensive. Baylors entire stadium cost 260m. 3x WSC.One thing to keep in mind is that we paid for not just the structure, but for the tear down and rebuild in one offseason. The timeline was very tight and we paid a premium for that. If we had the luxury of playing somewhere else for two or three years, I imagine the price of WSC (and VFC, for that matter) would have been less.Yes, we paid a lot of money for something you can't actually see, that's why it seems like we got poor value.Yup.I mean, take a step back and think about 2010-ish. If someone told you right then, that we're about to drop around $160 million on the stadium, wouldn't you expect something better than what is in place right now?
Jesus christ, some of you will bitch about anything.
Quote from: WackyCat08 on June 09, 2016, 10:57:54 AMJesus christ, some of you will bitch about anything.I'd say it's the K-State way... but then again, the K-State way is accepting mediocre things/mediocrity and saying stuff like "It's fine"
Quote from: Shooter Jones on June 09, 2016, 11:06:23 AMQuote from: WackyCat08 on June 09, 2016, 10:57:54 AMJesus christ, some of you will bitch about anything.I'd say it's the K-State way... but then again, the K-State way is accepting mediocre things/mediocrity and saying stuff like "It's fine"It's not mediocre, idiot. WTF did you want?