0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
we will take him, but it's daniel's show in 2015.
Quote from: sunny_cat on January 27, 2014, 09:10:22 PMQuote from: WackySquawk08 on January 27, 2014, 09:07:28 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on January 27, 2014, 09:03:31 PMQuote from: Jackstack99EMAW on January 27, 2014, 07:12:54 PMSo if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.I wish. Unfortunately, Truman will likely start.Hey dorks. Truman had some nice moments this season. Good grief.Yes, he's pretty good.AB messed up some of our Low football IQ'rs on what solid LB play is.
Quote from: WackySquawk08 on January 27, 2014, 09:07:28 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on January 27, 2014, 09:03:31 PMQuote from: Jackstack99EMAW on January 27, 2014, 07:12:54 PMSo if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.I wish. Unfortunately, Truman will likely start.Hey dorks. Truman had some nice moments this season. Good grief.Yes, he's pretty good.
Quote from: PowercatPat on January 27, 2014, 09:03:31 PMQuote from: Jackstack99EMAW on January 27, 2014, 07:12:54 PMSo if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.I wish. Unfortunately, Truman will likely start.Hey dorks. Truman had some nice moments this season. Good grief.
Quote from: Jackstack99EMAW on January 27, 2014, 07:12:54 PMSo if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.I wish. Unfortunately, Truman will likely start.
So if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.
Quote from: WackySquawk08 on January 27, 2014, 09:18:54 PMQuote from: sunny_cat on January 27, 2014, 09:10:22 PMQuote from: WackySquawk08 on January 27, 2014, 09:07:28 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on January 27, 2014, 09:03:31 PMQuote from: Jackstack99EMAW on January 27, 2014, 07:12:54 PMSo if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.I wish. Unfortunately, Truman will likely start.Hey dorks. Truman had some nice moments this season. Good grief.Yes, he's pretty good.AB messed up some of our Low football IQ'rs on what solid LB play is.It's not even fair comparing a LB to AB. He's a once in a generation type of player.
Quote from: bucket on January 27, 2014, 09:47:44 PMQuote from: WackySquawk08 on January 27, 2014, 09:18:54 PMQuote from: sunny_cat on January 27, 2014, 09:10:22 PMQuote from: WackySquawk08 on January 27, 2014, 09:07:28 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on January 27, 2014, 09:03:31 PMQuote from: Jackstack99EMAW on January 27, 2014, 07:12:54 PMSo if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.I wish. Unfortunately, Truman will likely start.Hey dorks. Truman had some nice moments this season. Good grief.Yes, he's pretty good.AB messed up some of our Low football IQ'rs on what solid LB play is.It's not even fair comparing a LB to AB. He's a once in a generation type of player.He was a really good college football player that went in the second round of the draft, not a "once in a generation type of player". We should have a guy like Arthur Brown on every year's team if we want to be really good.
Bottom Line STRENGTHS: Good sized corner with smooth movement skills and transitional footwork. Runs well showing good speed, just not always explosive speed. Shows polished off-man skills and can mirror receivers tightly; sharp out of breaks to decrease separation. Tracks deep ball and maintains good positioning. Good anticipation and timing jumping underneath routes in zone schemes. Really alert in reading the quarterback and underneath route progressions. Firm tackler on the edge, limits RAC. ... AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT: Not afraid to mix it up but would benefit from added strength and size to improve as a press man corner and matchup up more favorably with bigger outside receivers. Added size would also benefit his run support skills. ... BOTTOM LINE: Mack is a productive cornerback prospect who is good in a lot of areas but perhaps not a difference maker in one particular facet. Has a good understanding of coverages and is a scheme versatile DB who could challenge for early time at DB and on special teams.
Academics is a stupid word.Academic schools are synonymous for being rich, powerful and exclusive, three things Kansas State is not. So when people throw the word "academics" around, that's really what they are referencing.
ESPN has wrapped up their film review of Jesse Mack and rendered a final verdict. They like him better than Quintavious...and he got 3 yrs available.QuoteBottom Line STRENGTHS: Good sized corner with smooth movement skills and transitional footwork. Runs well showing good speed, just not always explosive speed. Shows polished off-man skills and can mirror receivers tightly; sharp out of breaks to decrease separation. Tracks deep ball and maintains good positioning. Good anticipation and timing jumping underneath routes in zone schemes. Really alert in reading the quarterback and underneath route progressions. Firm tackler on the edge, limits RAC. ... AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT: Not afraid to mix it up but would benefit from added strength and size to improve as a press man corner and matchup up more favorably with bigger outside receivers. Added size would also benefit his run support skills. ... BOTTOM LINE: Mack is a productive cornerback prospect who is good in a lot of areas but perhaps not a difference maker in one particular facet. Has a good understanding of coverages and is a scheme versatile DB who could challenge for early time at DB and on special teams.
Quote from: Jackstack99EMAW on January 27, 2014, 07:12:54 PMSo if we don't get Riddle, who starts at ILB? Ramirez? I would be ok with that.based on what?
the wabash brothers
Quote from: Dlew12 on January 27, 2014, 08:06:27 PM Who is this?
Did we back off of Myles Autry?
Quote from: Unruly on January 27, 2014, 02:49:28 PMDid we back off of Myles Autry?
KU has 3 4 stars..2 ESPN top 300, also a bunch of 3 star players... We just recently got a 4 star, why is our class rated higher, just curious?
Quote from: unleashthemob on January 28, 2014, 09:19:10 AMKU has 3 4 stars..2 ESPN top 300, also a bunch of 3 star players... We just recently got a 4 star, why is our class rated higher, just curious?I see one 4* (Wrench). We just recently got our second 4*. Our classes are basically the same, stars-wise. quoteWho is our 2 4*?
Who is our 2 4*? But that is what I thought also...pretty even as far as stars go...stars don't always matter, I think it depends on each system...
Quote from: GoodForAnother on January 27, 2014, 06:25:26 PMQuote from: yoga-like_abana on January 27, 2014, 02:41:23 PMQuote from: GoodForAnother on January 27, 2014, 12:38:10 PMthe wabash brothers probably the first meaningful post you've brought to this blogI love you too Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: yoga-like_abana on January 27, 2014, 02:41:23 PMQuote from: GoodForAnother on January 27, 2014, 12:38:10 PMthe wabash brothers probably the first meaningful post you've brought to this blogI love you too
Quote from: GoodForAnother on January 27, 2014, 12:38:10 PMthe wabash brothers probably the first meaningful post you've brought to this blog
Wasn't Warmack also once a 4 star?
Quote from: Emo EMAW on January 28, 2014, 09:43:28 AMWasn't Warmack also once a 4 star?no