Author Topic: Same old cac..... (Read 7703 times)

Powercat Posse · « **on:** February 12, 2011, 11:36:02 PM »

1 lousy pathetic fg in 9:27 stretch.

Cats ups 22-14. Get outscored 18-3 by the buffs. We f*ck around in our stupid offense and score only a f*ckin field goal for over 9 minutes.

56 pts at Boulder (13-0 and 12-0 runs. 2 LONG dry spells of 7 min and 5:15 with no pts)
56 pts at College Station (aTm 13-0 in 2nd half. Cats score 11 pts in 15:15 spurt in 2nd)
59 pts at Columbia (Mu goes on 12-0 in 2nd. Cats score 4 pts in final 8:13 of the game)
62 pts at Stillwater ( Pokes go on 16-2 run as we score only 7 pts in a 7 minute span down the stretch)
66 pts at Lawrence (25-9 run to start game. 9 pts in 12.5 minutes)

For the first time all year.... i hope this is an NIT team because our 2 seniors don't deserve anything more. F them and Frank and his pathetic offense

pike · « **Reply #1 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:37:50 PM »

Couldn't agree more

CHONGS · « **Reply #2 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:38:36 PM »

I hope we make the NCAA, can't understand people who want otherwise

the KHAN! · « **Reply #3 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:38:53 PM »

Well, I've been saying it all year too.

I just don't know what the hell to do about it?

I mean, it's not like this team has a leader at all....

We just love throwing the ball at the hoop without thinking when we get desperate.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:42:41 PM »

Quote from: Powercat Posse on February 12, 2011, 11:36:02 PM

1 lousy pathetic fg in 9:27 stretch.

Cats ups 22-14. Get outscored 18-3 by the buffs. We f*ck around in our stupid offense and don't put score a f*ckin field goal for over 9 minutes.

56 pts at Boulder (13-0 and 12-0 runs. 2 LONG dry spells of 7 min and 5:15 with no pts)
56 pts at College Station (aTm 13-0 in 2nd half. Cats score 11 pts in 15:15 spurt in 2nd)
59 pts at Columbia (Mu goes on 12-0 in 2nd. Cats score 4 pts in final 8:13 of the game)
62 pts at Stillwater ( get outscored 27-7 over 7 minute stretch late in the 2nd half)
66 pts at Lawrence (25-9 run to start game. 9 pts in 12.5 minutes)

For the first time all year.... i hope this is an NIT team because our 2 seniors don't deserve anything more. F them and Frank and his pathetic offense

Frank sat Jake for several minutes to end 1st half and start 2nd. No one should be surprised we can't score when the 5 on the floor are Shane, JHR, Sprads, Irving, and Vic or whatever shitty lineup we threw out there at the end of the 1st.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:46:28 PM »

Was screaming for 95 when that line up was on the floor

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #6 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:47:03 PM »

And the theme repeats itself.......

Our play in the 2nd half makes a Wooly team look pretty inticing.......

1) blow a 8 pt lead with 10 to go in Stillwater
2) Blow a 6 pt lead in College Station. Let an aTm team shoot 28% in the 2nd half and lose the game (and the half by 8 pts)

3) let Ku shoot 70 percent in the 2nd half. I think Bill Self would have gotten a layup had he been in the game
4) Cu's two runs (12-0 and 13-0) actually occured in the final 23 minutes..... so a small portion was a 1st half issue.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #7 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:48:17 PM »

Damn, this sucks.

KSU176 · « **Reply #8 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:48:21 PM »

Quote from: Skipper44 on February 12, 2011, 11:46:28 PM

Was screaming for 95 when that line up was on the floor

I was screaming for 95 when the refs went on a foul calling spree. The only player on the team that can drive without being a scared girl sits on the bench. Thanks, Frank.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #9 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:57:28 PM »

Quote from: KSU176 on February 12, 2011, 11:48:21 PM

Quote from: Skipper44 on February 12, 2011, 11:46:28 PM
Was screaming for 95 when that line up was on the floor
I was screaming for 95 when the refs went on a foul calling spree. The only player on the team that can drive without being a scared girl sits on the bench. Thanks, Frank.

also, found it very frustrating to watch #2 for CU turning the corner and making plays while ours was still wearing a t-shirt on the bench.

nicname · « **Reply #10 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:15:28 AM »

Quote from: Chingon on February 12, 2011, 11:38:36 PM

I hope we make the NCAA, can't understand people who want otherwise

Look, these motherfuckers were rough ridin' PRESEASON #3 in the country!! and look at them now, they rough ridin' don't deserve fans, these motherfuckers are rough ridin' pathetic and I rough ridin' HATE THEM for not being good as advertised. I deserve a rough ridin' WINNER!!

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #11 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:27:51 AM »

Hell, i am not mad they are not living up to their preseson #3 status.....

I am pissed they are not playing like a top 25 team and our coaching staff is clueless how to get this group to be halfway DECENT on offense. Just DECENT

1) Christ we hold OK St to 41 pts for 30 minutes, but because our offense sucks our lead is only 8 and not 16
2) As mentioned before, the untalented Aggies shoot 28 percent in the 2nd half and still outscore us 8 in that half. Wtf?
3) Buffs are below ave on D and yet we put up a measley 122 pts in 2 games against these jokers

a DECENT offense and this team would be 7-3 for sure in the league right now. DECENT meaning we could ave around 70-72 pts per game

Any BCS conf team that puts up scores of 56 56 59 62 66 66 and 69 is gonna have major major issues.

sys · « **Reply #12 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:31:05 AM »

Quote from: nicname on February 13, 2011, 12:15:28 AM

Quote from: Chingon on February 12, 2011, 11:38:36 PM
I hope we make the NCAA, can't understand people who want otherwise

Look, these motherfuckers were rough ridin' PRESEASON #3 in the country!! and look at them now, they rough ridin' don't deserve fans, these motherfuckers are rough ridin' pathetic and I rough ridin' HATE THEM for not being good as advertised. I deserve a rough ridin' WINNER!!

heh heh.

CatsFan_58 · « **Reply #13 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:47:42 AM »

Quote from: nicname on February 13, 2011, 12:15:28 AM

Quote from: Chingon on February 12, 2011, 11:38:36 PM
I hope we make the NCAA, can't understand people who want otherwise

Look, these motherfuckers were rough ridin' PRESEASON #3 in the country!! and look at them now, they rough ridin' don't deserve fans, these motherfuckers are rough ridin' pathetic and I rough ridin' HATE THEM for not being good as advertised. I deserve a rough ridin' WINNER!!

i kinda feel that way as well.

0.42 · « **Reply #14 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:52:34 AM »

Quote from: nicname on February 13, 2011, 12:15:28 AM

Quote from: Chingon on February 12, 2011, 11:38:36 PM
I hope we make the NCAA, can't understand people who want otherwise

Look, these motherfuckers were rough ridin' PRESEASON #3 in the country!! and look at them now, they rough ridin' don't deserve fans, these motherfuckers are rough ridin' pathetic and I rough ridin' HATE THEM for not being good as advertised. I deserve a rough ridin' WINNER!!

wow, solid bbs'n from nicname

MakeItRain · « **Reply #15 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:01:52 AM »

Quote from: Powercat Posse on February 13, 2011, 12:27:51 AM

Hell, i am not mad they are not living up to their preseson #3 status.....

I am pissed they are not playing like a top 25 team and our coaching staff is clueless how to get this group to be halfway DECENT on offense. Just DECENT

Well then you should have been disappointed when you realized that this team didn't have a point guard, no one wins without a point guard.

swish1 · « **Reply #16 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:03:31 AM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 13, 2011, 01:01:52 AM

Quote from: Powercat Posse on February 13, 2011, 12:27:51 AM
Hell, i am not mad they are not living up to their preseson #3 status.....

I am pissed they are not playing like a top 25 team and our coaching staff is clueless how to get this group to be halfway DECENT on offense. Just DECENT

Well then you should have been disappointed when you realized that this team didn't have a point guard, no one wins without a point guard.

duke? post irving?

sys · « **Reply #17 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:10:43 AM »

Quote from: swish1 on February 13, 2011, 01:03:31 AM

duke? post irving?

beasley's best friend, malone's stepkid. the top 30 recruit senior pg. he's a pretty good option.

swish1 · « **Reply #18 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:12:42 AM »

Quote from: sys on February 13, 2011, 01:10:43 AM

Quote from: swish1 on February 13, 2011, 01:03:31 AM
duke? post irving?

beasley's best friend, malone's stepkid. the top 30 recruit senior pg. he's a pretty good option.

eh, nolan smith is a better 2 kind of like jake. only hes better than jake. i was stretching. i will come up with an example.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #19 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:37:43 AM »

Quote from: swish1 on February 13, 2011, 01:12:42 AM

Quote from: sys on February 13, 2011, 01:10:43 AM
Quote from: swish1 on February 13, 2011, 01:03:31 AM
duke? post irving?

beasley's best friend, malone's stepkid. the top 30 recruit senior pg. he's a pretty good option.

eh, nolan smith is a better 2 kind of like jake. only hes better than jake. i was stretching. i will come up with an example.

good luck

kougar24 · « **Reply #20 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:43:27 AM »

KU doesn't really have a PG. They have an incredible frontcourt.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #21 on:** February 13, 2011, 01:52:22 AM »

Quote from: kougar24 on February 13, 2011, 01:43:27 AM

KU doesn't really have a PG. They have an incredible frontcourt.

We'd be 4 games better with either Taylor or Selby. KU hasn't appeared to have a dominant PG under Self but that is more of a product of the depth of talent and the system and not a reality of them not having a true point guard.

swish1 · « **Reply #22 on:** February 13, 2011, 02:16:19 AM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 13, 2011, 01:52:22 AM

Quote from: kougar24 on February 13, 2011, 01:43:27 AM
KU doesn't really have a PG. They have an incredible frontcourt.

We'd be 4 games better with either Taylor or Selby. KU hasn't appeared to have a dominant PG under Self but that is more of a product of the depth of talent and the system and not a reality of them not having a true point guard.

i was going to use the ku argument but pretty much agree with MIR's point. however we would be 4 games better with either of them b/c that means southwell, irving, spradling, etc. wouldnt be playing as much. not b/c they are great PG's but they are much better players.

michigancat · « **Reply #23 on:** February 13, 2011, 08:29:57 AM »

I don't think our problem on offense isn't "point guard", it's a lack of backcourt players that can score.

kougar24 · « **Reply #24 on:** February 13, 2011, 09:28:37 AM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 13, 2011, 01:52:22 AM

Quote from: kougar24 on February 13, 2011, 01:43:27 AM
KU doesn't really have a PG. They have an incredible frontcourt.

We'd be 4 games better with either Taylor or Selby. KU hasn't appeared to have a dominant PG under Self but that is more of a product of the depth of talent and the system and not a reality of them not having a true point guard.

I didn't say we wouldn't be better with their backcourt, but they technically "win without a point guard."

I think our #1 problem is the utter lack of any significant production whatsoever from our frontcourt. Our backcourt production is secondary, but at least we have those random games where we hit from deep.